Proof-of-concept for integrating multimodal digital health assessments into lifestyle interventions for older adults with dementia risk factors.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s10865-024-00546-7
Matthew W Schroeder, Madelyn R Frumkin, Ryan A Mace
{"title":"Proof-of-concept for integrating multimodal digital health assessments into lifestyle interventions for older adults with dementia risk factors.","authors":"Matthew W Schroeder, Madelyn R Frumkin, Ryan A Mace","doi":"10.1007/s10865-024-00546-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multimodal digital health assessments overcome the limitations of patient-reported outcomes by allowing for continuous and passive monitoring but remain underutilized in older adult lifestyle interventions for brain health. Therefore, we aim to (1) report ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and ActiGraph adherence among older adults during a lifestyle intervention; and (2) use dynamic data collected via EMA and ActiGraph to examine person-specific patterns of mindfulness, steps, and sleep throughout the intervention. We analyzed EMA and ActiGraph data from a pilot study of the 8-week My Healthy Brain program (N = 10) lifestyle group for older adults (60+) with subjective cognitive decline. EMA adherence metrics included proportion of EMA completed and the proportion of days with at least 10 mindfulness minutes. ActiGraph GT9X adherence metrics included the number of valid wear days (≥ 7 h) and the number of days participants achieved their step goal. We used linear mixed-effects models to examine person-specific patterns of step count, sleep efficiency, and mindfulness practice. On average, participants completed 39 of the 49 possible EMAs (80%) during the program. ActiGraph adherence was slightly higher than EMA (M = 61.40 days, 87.71%). Participants achieved the daily mindfulness goal (10 min/day) and step goal on 46.32% and 55.10% of days, respectively. Dynamic data revealed that on average, participant step counts increased by approximately 16.5 steps per day (b = 16.495, p = 0.002). However, some participants exhibited no changes while improvements made by other participants returned to baseline levels of activity. There was substantial heterogeneity in trajectories of mindfulness practice and sleep efficiency. EMA and ActiGraph are feasible for older adults enrolled in dementia risk reduction lifestyle interventions. Future studies are needed to better understand how mechanisms of lifestyle behaviors captured by EMA and ActiGraph are related to cognitive outcomes in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":48329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-024-00546-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multimodal digital health assessments overcome the limitations of patient-reported outcomes by allowing for continuous and passive monitoring but remain underutilized in older adult lifestyle interventions for brain health. Therefore, we aim to (1) report ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and ActiGraph adherence among older adults during a lifestyle intervention; and (2) use dynamic data collected via EMA and ActiGraph to examine person-specific patterns of mindfulness, steps, and sleep throughout the intervention. We analyzed EMA and ActiGraph data from a pilot study of the 8-week My Healthy Brain program (N = 10) lifestyle group for older adults (60+) with subjective cognitive decline. EMA adherence metrics included proportion of EMA completed and the proportion of days with at least 10 mindfulness minutes. ActiGraph GT9X adherence metrics included the number of valid wear days (≥ 7 h) and the number of days participants achieved their step goal. We used linear mixed-effects models to examine person-specific patterns of step count, sleep efficiency, and mindfulness practice. On average, participants completed 39 of the 49 possible EMAs (80%) during the program. ActiGraph adherence was slightly higher than EMA (M = 61.40 days, 87.71%). Participants achieved the daily mindfulness goal (10 min/day) and step goal on 46.32% and 55.10% of days, respectively. Dynamic data revealed that on average, participant step counts increased by approximately 16.5 steps per day (b = 16.495, p = 0.002). However, some participants exhibited no changes while improvements made by other participants returned to baseline levels of activity. There was substantial heterogeneity in trajectories of mindfulness practice and sleep efficiency. EMA and ActiGraph are feasible for older adults enrolled in dementia risk reduction lifestyle interventions. Future studies are needed to better understand how mechanisms of lifestyle behaviors captured by EMA and ActiGraph are related to cognitive outcomes in older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将多模式数字健康评估纳入有痴呆风险因素的老年人生活方式干预的概念验证。
多模式数字健康评估通过允许持续和被动监测,克服了患者报告结果的局限性,但在老年人脑健康生活方式干预中仍未得到充分利用。因此,我们的目标是(1)报告生活方式干预期间老年人的生态瞬时评估(EMA)和ActiGraph依从性;(2)使用通过EMA和ActiGraph收集的动态数据来检查整个干预过程中个人特定的正念、步骤和睡眠模式。我们对主观认知能力下降的老年人(60岁以上)进行了为期8周的“我的健康大脑”计划(N = 10)生活方式组的初步研究,分析了EMA和ActiGraph数据。EMA依从性指标包括完成EMA的比例和至少10分钟正念的天数比例。ActiGraph GT9X依从性指标包括有效磨损天数(≥7小时)和参与者达到其步骤目标的天数。我们使用线性混合效应模型来检验步数、睡眠效率和正念练习的个人特定模式。平均而言,参与者在项目期间完成了49个可能的ema中的39个(80%)。ActiGraph依从性略高于EMA (M = 61.40天,87.71%)。参与者分别有46.32%和55.10%的天数达到了每日正念目标(10分钟/天)和步数目标。动态数据显示,参与者平均每天增加约16.5步(b = 16.495, p = 0.002)。然而,一些参与者没有表现出任何变化,而其他参与者的活动有所改善,回到了基线水平。正念练习和睡眠效率的轨迹存在实质性的异质性。EMA和ActiGraph对于参加痴呆症风险降低生活方式干预的老年人是可行的。未来的研究需要更好地了解EMA和ActiGraph捕获的生活方式行为机制如何与老年人的认知结果相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal of Behavioral Medicine PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: The Journal of Behavioral Medicine is a broadly conceived interdisciplinary publication devoted to furthering understanding of physical health and illness through the knowledge, methods, and techniques of behavioral science. A significant function of the journal is the application of this knowledge to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation and to the promotion of health at the individual, community, and population levels.The content of the journal spans all areas of basic and applied behavioral medicine research, conducted in and informed by all related disciplines including but not limited to: psychology, medicine, the public health sciences, sociology, anthropology, health economics, nursing, and biostatistics. Topics welcomed include but are not limited to: prevention of disease and health promotion; the effects of psychological stress on physical and psychological functioning; sociocultural influences on health and illness; adherence to medical regimens; the study of health related behaviors including tobacco use, substance use, sexual behavior, physical activity, and obesity; health services research; and behavioral factors in the prevention and treatment of somatic disorders.  Reports of interdisciplinary approaches to research are particularly welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Cyclic sighing in the clinic waiting room may decrease pain: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Anxiety moderates the association between severity of food insecurity and sleep duration among young adults in food-insecure households. Progress on theory of planned behavior research: advances in research synthesis and agenda for future research. Proof-of-concept for integrating multimodal digital health assessments into lifestyle interventions for older adults with dementia risk factors. Psychometric evaluation of Liking and Wanting implicit association tests for physical activity and recreational screen use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1