A Qualitative Study of Attitudes Toward HPV Vaccine Recommendation in Otolaryngology Clinics.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1002/lio2.70085
Emily A Janio, Cori Walker, Eliza Steere, Aaron T Seaman, Natoshia Askelson, Nitin A Pagedar
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Attitudes Toward HPV Vaccine Recommendation in Otolaryngology Clinics.","authors":"Emily A Janio, Cori Walker, Eliza Steere, Aaron T Seaman, Natoshia Askelson, Nitin A Pagedar","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancers has increased such that they are now the most prevalent HPV-related cancer. In 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded the indication for Gardasil-9 to include the prevention of oropharyngeal and other head and neck cancers caused by selected HPV types, but uptake remains low. Otolaryngology office interactions may provide opportunities to increase uptake, given the relevance of HPV to clinical practice. This study explored the feasibility of recommending HPV vaccination in otolaryngology clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited between February to June of 2022 from the alumni of the residency and fellowship training programs at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Participant interviews comprised open-ended questions pertaining to otolaryngologists' attitudes toward HPV vaccination recommendation. Interview recordings were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were willing to respond if patients asked about the HPV vaccine, although a common attitude toward vaccine discussions was that they were a pediatrician's responsibility. One barrier to recommending HPV vaccination was providers' concern that discussing the vaccine when not directly relevant to the patient's chief complaint could result in patient frustration. Nevertheless, participants endorsed the feasibility of discussing the vaccine during follow-up visits after the patient's needs had been addressed or via the distribution of educational materials to patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Otolaryngologists do not currently identify recommending HPV vaccine uptake as their clinical responsibility. While such recommendations may not be feasible in every patient encounter, there could be a role for this in the appropriate clinical scenario. These findings can be used to inform interventions aimed at recommending the vaccine in otolaryngology clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 1","pages":"e70085"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancers has increased such that they are now the most prevalent HPV-related cancer. In 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded the indication for Gardasil-9 to include the prevention of oropharyngeal and other head and neck cancers caused by selected HPV types, but uptake remains low. Otolaryngology office interactions may provide opportunities to increase uptake, given the relevance of HPV to clinical practice. This study explored the feasibility of recommending HPV vaccination in otolaryngology clinics.

Methods: Participants were recruited between February to June of 2022 from the alumni of the residency and fellowship training programs at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. Participant interviews comprised open-ended questions pertaining to otolaryngologists' attitudes toward HPV vaccination recommendation. Interview recordings were transcribed, coded, and analyzed for themes.

Results: Participants were willing to respond if patients asked about the HPV vaccine, although a common attitude toward vaccine discussions was that they were a pediatrician's responsibility. One barrier to recommending HPV vaccination was providers' concern that discussing the vaccine when not directly relevant to the patient's chief complaint could result in patient frustration. Nevertheless, participants endorsed the feasibility of discussing the vaccine during follow-up visits after the patient's needs had been addressed or via the distribution of educational materials to patients.

Conclusion: Otolaryngologists do not currently identify recommending HPV vaccine uptake as their clinical responsibility. While such recommendations may not be feasible in every patient encounter, there could be a role for this in the appropriate clinical scenario. These findings can be used to inform interventions aimed at recommending the vaccine in otolaryngology clinics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耳鼻喉科门诊对HPV疫苗推荐态度的定性研究
目的:人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关口咽癌的发病率增加,使其成为目前最普遍的HPV相关癌症。2020年,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)扩大了Gardasil-9的适应症,包括预防由选定的HPV类型引起的口咽癌和其他头颈癌,但摄取仍然很低。鉴于HPV与临床实践的相关性,耳鼻喉科的相互作用可能提供增加摄取的机会。本研究探讨在耳鼻喉科诊所推荐接种HPV疫苗的可行性。方法:参与者于2022年2月至6月从爱荷华大学医院和诊所的住院医师和奖学金培训项目的校友中招募。参与者访谈包括与耳鼻喉科医生对HPV疫苗接种建议的态度有关的开放式问题。采访录音被转录、编码并分析主题。结果:如果患者询问HPV疫苗,参与者愿意回答,尽管对疫苗讨论的普遍态度是他们是儿科医生的责任。推荐HPV疫苗接种的一个障碍是提供者担心在与患者主诉没有直接关系的情况下讨论疫苗可能导致患者沮丧。然而,与会者赞成在病人的需要得到满足后的随访期间或通过向病人分发教育材料讨论疫苗的可行性。结论:耳鼻喉科医生目前不确定推荐HPV疫苗接种作为他们的临床责任。虽然这些建议可能并不适用于每一位患者,但在适当的临床情况下可能会发挥作用。这些发现可用于为耳鼻喉科诊所推荐疫苗的干预措施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Smartphone Thermal Imaging as an Adjunct to Identify Free Flap Perforators and Assisting Flap Design: A Pilot Study. A Qualitative Study of Attitudes Toward HPV Vaccine Recommendation in Otolaryngology Clinics. Multi-Institutional Comparison of Quality of Life Between Open Versus Endoscopic Skull Base Approaches. Prognostic value of inflammation and nutritional indicators for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study. Role of neck dissections in the management of carotid body tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1