Geographic variations, temporal trends, and equity in healthcare resource allocation in China, 2010-21.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04008
Shaohua Yin, Zhenlin Liu, Sujuan Yu, Ying Li, Ji An, Dong Wang, Hongjia Yan, Ying Xiao, Feng Xu, Yun Tian, Xiaoxiao Luan
{"title":"Geographic variations, temporal trends, and equity in healthcare resource allocation in China, 2010-21.","authors":"Shaohua Yin, Zhenlin Liu, Sujuan Yu, Ying Li, Ji An, Dong Wang, Hongjia Yan, Ying Xiao, Feng Xu, Yun Tian, Xiaoxiao Luan","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inequity in healthcare resources has been identified as a global public health priority, yet the geographic variations and temporal trends in distribution and inequity in China remain unclear. We aimed to investigate these variations and temporal trends in healthcare resources and evaluate inequity in healthcare resource allocation in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this nationwide descriptive study, we used provincial-level data on healthcare infrastructure, human, and service resources from 31 provinces of mainland China, publicly released by the National Health Commission of China between 2010-21. We assessed the spatial autocorrelation of healthcare infrastructure, human, and service resources using Moran's I index, and identified spatial clusters of resource allocation. We evaluated the equity in healthcare resource allocation using the Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and Theil index by population and geographic dimensions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2010-21, the density of healthcare infrastructure and human resources in China increased, with the average stay decreasing from 10.5 to 9.2 days. There were substantial regional disparities, with higher resource density exhibited in eastern regions compared to western regions. Spatial autocorrelation was more pronounced for the density of practising (assistant) physicians (Moran's I = 0.465; P < 0.001), practising physicians (Moran's I = 0.351; P < 0.001), and bed occupancy rate (Moran's I = 0.256; P < 0.001), with significant geographic clusters of resource allocation. Lorenz curves showed that healthcare resource allocation was closer to the absolute equity by population but not geographic dimension, with Gini coefficients indicating severe inequity (>0.6) by geographic dimension compared to perfect equity (<0.2) by population dimension. Intraregional Theil index by population was higher than the inter-regional index, with contribution rates exceeding 60%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Per capita access to healthcare resources in China has improved, but significant geographic variations and clustering exist, particularly with higher resource density in eastern regions. While resource allocation by population showed better equity than by geographic area, substantial intra-regional disparities highlight the need for targeted strategies to enhance equitable distribution, particularly in the western regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inequity in healthcare resources has been identified as a global public health priority, yet the geographic variations and temporal trends in distribution and inequity in China remain unclear. We aimed to investigate these variations and temporal trends in healthcare resources and evaluate inequity in healthcare resource allocation in China.

Methods: In this nationwide descriptive study, we used provincial-level data on healthcare infrastructure, human, and service resources from 31 provinces of mainland China, publicly released by the National Health Commission of China between 2010-21. We assessed the spatial autocorrelation of healthcare infrastructure, human, and service resources using Moran's I index, and identified spatial clusters of resource allocation. We evaluated the equity in healthcare resource allocation using the Lorenz curve, Gini coefficient, and Theil index by population and geographic dimensions.

Results: Between 2010-21, the density of healthcare infrastructure and human resources in China increased, with the average stay decreasing from 10.5 to 9.2 days. There were substantial regional disparities, with higher resource density exhibited in eastern regions compared to western regions. Spatial autocorrelation was more pronounced for the density of practising (assistant) physicians (Moran's I = 0.465; P < 0.001), practising physicians (Moran's I = 0.351; P < 0.001), and bed occupancy rate (Moran's I = 0.256; P < 0.001), with significant geographic clusters of resource allocation. Lorenz curves showed that healthcare resource allocation was closer to the absolute equity by population but not geographic dimension, with Gini coefficients indicating severe inequity (>0.6) by geographic dimension compared to perfect equity (<0.2) by population dimension. Intraregional Theil index by population was higher than the inter-regional index, with contribution rates exceeding 60%.

Conclusions: Per capita access to healthcare resources in China has improved, but significant geographic variations and clustering exist, particularly with higher resource density in eastern regions. While resource allocation by population showed better equity than by geographic area, substantial intra-regional disparities highlight the need for targeted strategies to enhance equitable distribution, particularly in the western regions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2010-21年中国医疗资源分配的地理差异、时间趋势和公平性。
背景:医疗资源不公平已被确定为全球公共卫生优先事项,但中国分布和不公平的地理差异和时间趋势尚不清楚。我们的目的是调查这些变化和医疗资源的时间趋势,并评估中国医疗资源分配的不公平。方法:在这项全国性的描述性研究中,我们使用了中国大陆31个省份2010-21年间由中国国家卫生健康委员会公开发布的卫生保健基础设施、人力和服务资源的省级数据。利用Moran's I指数评估了医疗卫生基础设施、人力资源和服务资源的空间自相关性,并确定了资源配置的空间集群。我们利用洛伦兹曲线、基尼系数和泰尔指数对人口和地理维度的医疗资源分配公平性进行了评估。结果:2010-21年,中国医疗卫生设施和人力资源密度增加,平均住院时间从10.5天减少到9.2天。区域差异明显,东部地区资源密度高于西部地区。执业(助理)医师密度的空间自相关性更为显著(Moran’s I = 0.465;结论:中国人均医疗资源可及性有所提高,但存在显著的地理差异和聚集性,特别是东部地区资源密度较高。虽然按人口分配的资源比按地理区域分配的资源更公平,但区域内的巨大差距突出了需要有针对性的战略来加强公平分配,特别是在西部区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Paediatric healthcare in Manhiça district through a gender lens: a retrospective analysis of 17 years of morbidity and demographic surveillance data. Spatial patterns and temporal trends in stillbirth, neonatal, and infant mortality: an exploration of country-level data from 2000 to 2021. The treatment responses among different inhalation therapies for GOLD group E patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The efficiency and productivity-changing trend of PHCIs since the 2009 health reform in China based on a three-stage DEA and Malmquist Productivity Index. Using calculations from the Lives Saved Tool in other global health modelling tools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1