Factors associated with unplanned readmissions for patients with mental and behavioural disorders in China: a quantitative analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Health Action Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2024.2435642
Sha Lai, Zechen Wang, Chi Shen, Junfei Feng, Yawei Huang, Xiaolong Zhang, Li Lu, Zhongliang Zhou
{"title":"Factors associated with unplanned readmissions for patients with mental and behavioural disorders in China: a quantitative analysis.","authors":"Sha Lai, Zechen Wang, Chi Shen, Junfei Feng, Yawei Huang, Xiaolong Zhang, Li Lu, Zhongliang Zhou","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2024.2435642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unplanned readmissions among patients with mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) disrupt inpatient recovery and impose financial burdens on families and healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the 31-day unplanned inpatient readmission rates for MBDs in China and identify determinant profiles from the perspective of individual, hospital, and contextual levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients with MBDs were collected from the medical records of 99 public hospitals across 10 cities. A total of 49,352 inpatient admissions were analysed based on the proposed conceptual model using multilevel logistic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 31-day unplanned readmission rate (excluding 0-1-day returns) was 8.6% (95% CI: 8.4-8.9%). Determinant profiles differed across the overall group and subgroups. The number of general practitioners within cities was associated with reduced risk of unplanned readmissions. Hospital factors such as facility type and size, human resources, and revenue size were associated with unplanned readmissions only in specific subgroups. Additionally, individual-level factors, including demographic information (e.g. gender, age, marital status, and occupational status), disease-related factors (e.g. primary diagnostic group, condition at admission, and other diagnoses), and clinical characteristics (e.g. length of stay and medical costs), were associated with unplanned readmissions across all subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study emphasises collaborative efforts from health systems, hospitals, and patients to reduce unplanned readmissions for MDBs. Health systems should focus on improving access to care, enhancing quality, and ensuring continuity while providing incentives for hospitals. Additionally, hospitals should prioritise the identification and effective management of their high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"17 1","pages":"2435642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2435642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unplanned readmissions among patients with mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) disrupt inpatient recovery and impose financial burdens on families and healthcare systems.

Objectives: To estimate the 31-day unplanned inpatient readmission rates for MBDs in China and identify determinant profiles from the perspective of individual, hospital, and contextual levels.

Methods: Data from patients with MBDs were collected from the medical records of 99 public hospitals across 10 cities. A total of 49,352 inpatient admissions were analysed based on the proposed conceptual model using multilevel logistic regressions.

Results: The 31-day unplanned readmission rate (excluding 0-1-day returns) was 8.6% (95% CI: 8.4-8.9%). Determinant profiles differed across the overall group and subgroups. The number of general practitioners within cities was associated with reduced risk of unplanned readmissions. Hospital factors such as facility type and size, human resources, and revenue size were associated with unplanned readmissions only in specific subgroups. Additionally, individual-level factors, including demographic information (e.g. gender, age, marital status, and occupational status), disease-related factors (e.g. primary diagnostic group, condition at admission, and other diagnoses), and clinical characteristics (e.g. length of stay and medical costs), were associated with unplanned readmissions across all subgroups.

Conclusion: The study emphasises collaborative efforts from health systems, hospitals, and patients to reduce unplanned readmissions for MDBs. Health systems should focus on improving access to care, enhancing quality, and ensuring continuity while providing incentives for hospitals. Additionally, hospitals should prioritise the identification and effective management of their high-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国精神和行为障碍患者意外再入院的相关因素:定量分析。
背景:精神和行为障碍(MBDs)患者的意外再入院扰乱了住院患者的康复,并给家庭和医疗保健系统带来了经济负担。目的:估计中国MBDs 31天非计划住院再入院率,并从个人、医院和环境层面确定决定因素。方法:收集全国10个城市99所公立医院的MBDs患者病历资料。基于所提出的概念模型,采用多水平逻辑回归对49352例住院患者进行了分析。结果:31天非计划再入院率(不包括0-1天的复发)为8.6% (95% CI: 8.4-8.9%)。决定因素在整个组和亚组之间存在差异。城市中全科医生的数量与意外再入院的风险降低有关。医院因素,如设施类型和规模、人力资源和收入规模,仅在特定亚组中与计划外再入院相关。此外,个人层面的因素,包括人口统计信息(如性别、年龄、婚姻状况和职业状况)、疾病相关因素(如主要诊断组、入院时的状况和其他诊断)和临床特征(如住院时间和医疗费用),与所有亚组的意外再入院有关。结论:该研究强调了卫生系统、医院和患者的合作努力,以减少mdb的意外再入院。卫生系统应侧重于改善获得医疗服务的机会、提高质量和确保连续性,同时为医院提供激励。此外,医院应优先识别和有效管理其高危患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and associated factors for poor mental health among young migrants in Sweden: a cross-sectional study. The effectiveness of rural community health workers in improving health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Adaptation and validation of the Children's Surgical Assessment Tool for Rwandan district hospitals. Electronic health record and primary care physician self-reported quality of care: a multilevel study in China. Recruiting hard-to-reach populations via respondent driven sampling for mobile phone surveys in Colombia: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1