Sha Lai, Zechen Wang, Chi Shen, Junfei Feng, Yawei Huang, Xiaolong Zhang, Li Lu, Zhongliang Zhou
{"title":"Factors associated with unplanned readmissions for patients with mental and behavioural disorders in China: a quantitative analysis.","authors":"Sha Lai, Zechen Wang, Chi Shen, Junfei Feng, Yawei Huang, Xiaolong Zhang, Li Lu, Zhongliang Zhou","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2024.2435642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unplanned readmissions among patients with mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) disrupt inpatient recovery and impose financial burdens on families and healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To estimate the 31-day unplanned inpatient readmission rates for MBDs in China and identify determinant profiles from the perspective of individual, hospital, and contextual levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from patients with MBDs were collected from the medical records of 99 public hospitals across 10 cities. A total of 49,352 inpatient admissions were analysed based on the proposed conceptual model using multilevel logistic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 31-day unplanned readmission rate (excluding 0-1-day returns) was 8.6% (95% CI: 8.4-8.9%). Determinant profiles differed across the overall group and subgroups. The number of general practitioners within cities was associated with reduced risk of unplanned readmissions. Hospital factors such as facility type and size, human resources, and revenue size were associated with unplanned readmissions only in specific subgroups. Additionally, individual-level factors, including demographic information (e.g. gender, age, marital status, and occupational status), disease-related factors (e.g. primary diagnostic group, condition at admission, and other diagnoses), and clinical characteristics (e.g. length of stay and medical costs), were associated with unplanned readmissions across all subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study emphasises collaborative efforts from health systems, hospitals, and patients to reduce unplanned readmissions for MDBs. Health systems should focus on improving access to care, enhancing quality, and ensuring continuity while providing incentives for hospitals. Additionally, hospitals should prioritise the identification and effective management of their high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"17 1","pages":"2435642"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2435642","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Unplanned readmissions among patients with mental and behavioural disorders (MBDs) disrupt inpatient recovery and impose financial burdens on families and healthcare systems.
Objectives: To estimate the 31-day unplanned inpatient readmission rates for MBDs in China and identify determinant profiles from the perspective of individual, hospital, and contextual levels.
Methods: Data from patients with MBDs were collected from the medical records of 99 public hospitals across 10 cities. A total of 49,352 inpatient admissions were analysed based on the proposed conceptual model using multilevel logistic regressions.
Results: The 31-day unplanned readmission rate (excluding 0-1-day returns) was 8.6% (95% CI: 8.4-8.9%). Determinant profiles differed across the overall group and subgroups. The number of general practitioners within cities was associated with reduced risk of unplanned readmissions. Hospital factors such as facility type and size, human resources, and revenue size were associated with unplanned readmissions only in specific subgroups. Additionally, individual-level factors, including demographic information (e.g. gender, age, marital status, and occupational status), disease-related factors (e.g. primary diagnostic group, condition at admission, and other diagnoses), and clinical characteristics (e.g. length of stay and medical costs), were associated with unplanned readmissions across all subgroups.
Conclusion: The study emphasises collaborative efforts from health systems, hospitals, and patients to reduce unplanned readmissions for MDBs. Health systems should focus on improving access to care, enhancing quality, and ensuring continuity while providing incentives for hospitals. Additionally, hospitals should prioritise the identification and effective management of their high-risk patients.
期刊介绍:
Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research.
Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health.
Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.