James J Pierre, Alex W Yang, Charles A Riley, Anthony M Tolisano
{"title":"The Impact of Financial Coverage on Hearing Aid Utilization Rates Within the Military Health System.","authors":"James J Pierre, Alex W Yang, Charles A Riley, Anthony M Tolisano","doi":"10.1002/lary.32013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate hearing aid utilization rates among populations with varying hearing aid insurance benefits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed. A total of 377 patients were included in the study after being identified through consecutive, hearing loss-related otology clinic visits. With respect to hearing aid benefits, patients were separated into full, partial, and no coverage populations. Chart reviews identified if a patient underwent hearing aid evaluation and fitting. Audiometric data were collected. Chi-square tests of independence and two-sided Z-tests were used for statistical analysis. ANOVA single-factor analysis testing was used to analyze pure tone averages (PTA) and word recognition scores (WRS) data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 377 patients who met criteria included: full insurance coverage (n = 210, mean age = 45 years), partial coverage (n = 82, mean age = 65 years), and no coverage (n = 85, mean age = 54 years). The full- and partial-coverage populations each had significantly higher hearing aid utilization rates (78% and 79%, respectively) than the no-coverage population (49%, p < 0.001). No statistical difference in mean PTA or WRS was noted among the three coverage categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with at least partial financial coverage are more likely to acquire hearing aids than those without despite similar degrees of hearing loss. This implies that the out-of-pocket cost of hearing aids is a primary impediment to hearing aid adoption and provides a useful road map for public and private insurers considering hearing aid coverage.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III (retrospective cohort study) Laryngoscope, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":49921,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.32013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate hearing aid utilization rates among populations with varying hearing aid insurance benefits.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. A total of 377 patients were included in the study after being identified through consecutive, hearing loss-related otology clinic visits. With respect to hearing aid benefits, patients were separated into full, partial, and no coverage populations. Chart reviews identified if a patient underwent hearing aid evaluation and fitting. Audiometric data were collected. Chi-square tests of independence and two-sided Z-tests were used for statistical analysis. ANOVA single-factor analysis testing was used to analyze pure tone averages (PTA) and word recognition scores (WRS) data.
Results: The 377 patients who met criteria included: full insurance coverage (n = 210, mean age = 45 years), partial coverage (n = 82, mean age = 65 years), and no coverage (n = 85, mean age = 54 years). The full- and partial-coverage populations each had significantly higher hearing aid utilization rates (78% and 79%, respectively) than the no-coverage population (49%, p < 0.001). No statistical difference in mean PTA or WRS was noted among the three coverage categories.
Conclusion: Patients with at least partial financial coverage are more likely to acquire hearing aids than those without despite similar degrees of hearing loss. This implies that the out-of-pocket cost of hearing aids is a primary impediment to hearing aid adoption and provides a useful road map for public and private insurers considering hearing aid coverage.
Level of evidence: Level III (retrospective cohort study) Laryngoscope, 2025.
期刊介绍：
The Laryngoscope has been the leading source of information on advances in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck disorders since 1890. The Laryngoscope is the first choice among otolaryngologists for publication of their important findings and techniques. Each monthly issue of The Laryngoscope features peer-reviewed medical, clinical, and research contributions in general otolaryngology, allergy/rhinology, otology/neurotology, laryngology/bronchoesophagology, head and neck surgery, sleep medicine, pediatric otolaryngology, facial plastics and reconstructive surgery, oncology, and communicative disorders. Contributions include papers and posters presented at the Annual and Section Meetings of the Triological Society, as well as independent papers, "How I Do It", "Triological Best Practice" articles, and contemporary reviews. Theses authored by the Triological Society’s new Fellows as well as papers presented at meetings of the American Laryngological Association are published in The Laryngoscope.
• Broncho-esophagology
• Communicative disorders
• Head and neck surgery
• Plastic and reconstructive facial surgery
• Oncology
• Speech and hearing defects
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
