Slipping Through the Cracks? Concussion Management in Aotearoa New Zealand Secondary Schools.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of School Health Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1111/josh.13544
Danielle Salmon, Marelise Badenhorst, Anja Zoellner, Debbie Skilton, Kate Mossman, Patricia Lucas, Kylie Thompson, Simon Walters, Sierra Keung, Gisela Sole
{"title":"Slipping Through the Cracks? Concussion Management in Aotearoa New Zealand Secondary Schools.","authors":"Danielle Salmon, Marelise Badenhorst, Anja Zoellner, Debbie Skilton, Kate Mossman, Patricia Lucas, Kylie Thompson, Simon Walters, Sierra Keung, Gisela Sole","doi":"10.1111/josh.13544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concussion-related guidelines appear to be inconsistently implemented in secondary schools in Aotearoa New Zealand. The purpose of this qualitative Participatory Action Research study was to describe key school stakeholders' perceptions of their current concussion management processes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen focus groups, two dyad, and nine individual interviews were conducted with stakeholders (n = 95) from six secondary schools and healthcare clinics, exploring their perceptions of barriers and facilitators to concussion management. We used thematic analysis to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis identified five overarching and inter-relating themes: Hit or miss, the need for a clear pathway; the school context; aligning attitudes and enacting values; concussion knowledge and education; and complexity of concussion. The effectiveness of concussion management in secondary school settings is shaped by the dynamic interaction of these five themes.</p><p><strong>Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: </strong>These findings highlight the need to develop a context-sensitive framework that can assist schools with real-world implementation of concussion management guidelines, for both sports and non-sports related concussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intent to support students was evident among most stakeholders yet appeared to be limited by lack of structured processes to follow, resources, unfavorable attitudes towards concussion management, and lack of knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Concussion-related guidelines appear to be inconsistently implemented in secondary schools in Aotearoa New Zealand. The purpose of this qualitative Participatory Action Research study was to describe key school stakeholders' perceptions of their current concussion management processes.

Methods: Seventeen focus groups, two dyad, and nine individual interviews were conducted with stakeholders (n = 95) from six secondary schools and healthcare clinics, exploring their perceptions of barriers and facilitators to concussion management. We used thematic analysis to analyze data.

Results: Our analysis identified five overarching and inter-relating themes: Hit or miss, the need for a clear pathway; the school context; aligning attitudes and enacting values; concussion knowledge and education; and complexity of concussion. The effectiveness of concussion management in secondary school settings is shaped by the dynamic interaction of these five themes.

Implications for school health policy, practice, and equity: These findings highlight the need to develop a context-sensitive framework that can assist schools with real-world implementation of concussion management guidelines, for both sports and non-sports related concussions.

Conclusions: The intent to support students was evident among most stakeholders yet appeared to be limited by lack of structured processes to follow, resources, unfavorable attitudes towards concussion management, and lack of knowledge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从裂缝中溜走?新西兰奥特罗阿中学的脑震荡管理。
背景:脑震荡相关的指导方针似乎在新西兰奥特罗阿的中学执行不一致。本定性参与行动研究的目的是描述学校主要利益相关者对其当前脑震荡管理过程的看法。方法:对来自6所中学和医疗保健诊所的利益相关者(n = 95)进行了17个焦点小组、2个双人组和9个个人访谈,探讨他们对脑震荡管理障碍和促进因素的看法。我们使用主题分析来分析数据。结果:我们的分析确定了五个总体和相互关联的主题:成功或失败,需要明确的路径;学校环境;调整态度和制定价值观;脑震荡知识与教育;以及脑震荡的复杂性。中学环境中脑震荡管理的有效性是由这五个主题的动态相互作用形成的。对学校健康政策、实践和公平的影响:这些发现强调需要制定一个对环境敏感的框架,以帮助学校在现实世界中实施脑震荡管理指南,包括体育和非体育相关的脑震荡。结论:大多数利益相关者支持学生的意图是明显的,但由于缺乏结构化的流程、资源、对脑震荡管理的不利态度和缺乏知识,似乎受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
期刊最新文献
Recovery and Response: Responding to Mental Health Needs That Emerged in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chicago Public Schools. American School Health Association Membership Survey: Leading the Way Into the Next Century. Three-Dimensional (3D) Printing in Non-Industrial Spaces: A Summary of Emissions Evaluations in 11 School Settings. Issue Information Slipping Through the Cracks? Concussion Management in Aotearoa New Zealand Secondary Schools.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1