Anxiety, Depression, and Expanded Disability Status Scale Independently Predict the Perception of Disability in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Behavioural Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/bn/2744955
Chiara Curatoli, Alessia Marcassoli, Filippo Barbadoro, Arianna Fornari, Matilde Leonardi, Alberto Raggi, Silvia Schiavolin, Rachele Terragni, Carlo Antozzi, Laura Brambilla, Valentina Torri Clerici, Paolo Confalonieri, Renato Mantegazza, Martina Lanza
{"title":"Anxiety, Depression, and Expanded Disability Status Scale Independently Predict the Perception of Disability in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Chiara Curatoli, Alessia Marcassoli, Filippo Barbadoro, Arianna Fornari, Matilde Leonardi, Alberto Raggi, Silvia Schiavolin, Rachele Terragni, Carlo Antozzi, Laura Brambilla, Valentina Torri Clerici, Paolo Confalonieri, Renato Mantegazza, Martina Lanza","doi":"10.1155/bn/2744955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of disability in young adults due to several motor, sensory, and cognitive symptoms. However, little is still known about the impact of psychological, cognitive, and social-support variables on subjective disability. This study is aimed at exploring the role of clinical, psychological, cognitive, and social-support variables in predicting disability levels as perceived by persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were used as subjective and objective measures of disability, respectively. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory-II assessed symptoms of anxiety and depression; 19-item Medical Outcome Study-Social Support Survey assessed social support; and Rao's Brief Repeatable Battery assessed cognitive functioning. A multivariable regression analysis was applied using the WHODAS 2.0 as an outcome. One hundred and fifty-one pwMS (93 females, mean age 51.6, standard deviation (SD) 5.8) were enrolled. EDSS (<i>β</i> = 7.190; <i>p</i> < 0.001), state anxiety (<i>β</i> = 0.265; <i>p</i> = 0.009), and symptoms of depression (<i>β</i> = 0.835; <i>p</i> < 0.001) explained a large amount of the variance of subjective disability (Adj.<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.705; <i>p</i> < 0.001) measured through the WHODAS 2.0. Contrarily, cognitive functioning and perceived social support are not independently associated with the WHODAS 2.0 score. Psychosocial interventions in rehabilitation settings, aimed at reducing the overall perceived disability of pwMS, should be implemented in rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50733,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Neurology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2744955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/bn/2744955","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common cause of disability in young adults due to several motor, sensory, and cognitive symptoms. However, little is still known about the impact of psychological, cognitive, and social-support variables on subjective disability. This study is aimed at exploring the role of clinical, psychological, cognitive, and social-support variables in predicting disability levels as perceived by persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) were used as subjective and objective measures of disability, respectively. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory-II assessed symptoms of anxiety and depression; 19-item Medical Outcome Study-Social Support Survey assessed social support; and Rao's Brief Repeatable Battery assessed cognitive functioning. A multivariable regression analysis was applied using the WHODAS 2.0 as an outcome. One hundred and fifty-one pwMS (93 females, mean age 51.6, standard deviation (SD) 5.8) were enrolled. EDSS (β = 7.190; p < 0.001), state anxiety (β = 0.265; p = 0.009), and symptoms of depression (β = 0.835; p < 0.001) explained a large amount of the variance of subjective disability (Adj.R 2 = 0.705; p < 0.001) measured through the WHODAS 2.0. Contrarily, cognitive functioning and perceived social support are not independently associated with the WHODAS 2.0 score. Psychosocial interventions in rehabilitation settings, aimed at reducing the overall perceived disability of pwMS, should be implemented in rehabilitation programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
焦虑、抑郁和扩展残疾状态量表独立预测多发性硬化症患者的残疾感知:一项横断面研究
多发性硬化症(MS)是年轻人中最常见的致残原因,由几种运动、感觉和认知症状引起。然而,关于心理、认知和社会支持变量对主观残疾的影响,我们所知甚少。本研究旨在探讨临床、心理、认知和社会支持变量在预测多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者感知的残疾水平中的作用。采用世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS 2.0)和扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)作为残疾的主观和客观衡量标准。状态-特质焦虑量表和贝克抑郁量表- ii评估焦虑和抑郁症状;19项医疗结果研究-社会支持调查评估社会支持;Rao的简短可重复电池评估了认知功能。采用WHODAS 2.0作为结果,进行多变量回归分析。纳入151名pwMS患者(女性93名,平均年龄51.6岁,标准差(SD) 5.8)。Edss (β = 7.190;P < 0.001),状态焦虑(β = 0.265;P = 0.009),抑郁症状(β = 0.835;p < 0.001)解释了主观残疾的大量差异(Adj.R 2 = 0.705;p < 0.001),通过WHODAS 2.0测量。相反,认知功能和感知社会支持与WHODAS 2.0评分没有独立的相关性。康复环境中的社会心理干预,旨在减少pwMS的整体感知残疾,应该在康复计划中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Neurology
Behavioural Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioural Neurology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and clinical studies based on various diseases and syndromes in behavioural neurology. The aim of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers and clinicians working in various fields of neurology including cognitive neuroscience, neuropsychology and neuropsychiatry. Topics of interest include: ADHD Aphasia Autism Alzheimer’s Disease Behavioural Disorders Dementia Epilepsy Multiple Sclerosis Parkinson’s Disease Psychosis Stroke Traumatic brain injury.
期刊最新文献
The Prognostic Factors in Children With Status Epilepticus and Status Epilepticus Severity Score Scales. Anxiety, Depression, and Expanded Disability Status Scale Independently Predict the Perception of Disability in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Antiamnesic and Neurotrophic Effects of Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R. Br (Fabaceae) Aqueous Extract on In Vivo and In Vitro Models of Excitotoxicity. Activating the Astrocytes of the Dorsal Raphe Nucleus via Its Neural Circuits With the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Improves Depression in Mice. Comparative Analysis of Cognitive and Psychiatric Functioning in People With Cushing's Disease in Biochemical Remission and People With Nonfunctioning Adenomas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1