A new histomorphological finding in the follow-up of celiac disease: Intraepithelial lymphocyte localization is a reliable indicator of dietary compliance.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Annals of Diagnostic Pathology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2025.152438
F Yilmaz, K Atay
{"title":"A new histomorphological finding in the follow-up of celiac disease: Intraepithelial lymphocyte localization is a reliable indicator of dietary compliance.","authors":"F Yilmaz, K Atay","doi":"10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2025.152438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The correlation between clinical, serological, and endoscopic findings and histological response after a gluten-free diet (GFD) is limited in adult celiac (CD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of GFD on intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) localization by comparing the histopathological, clinical, serological, and endoscopic findings of adult CD patients. The patients (n = 131) were divided into three groups: those with good (CDgc) (n = 23) and poor (CDpc) (n = 21) GFD compliance and newly diagnosed ones (nCD) (n = 87). Total and supranuclear IELs were counted per 100 enterocytes and divided into three groups: apical, mixed, and basal, according to ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) analysis. The roles of clinicopathological parameters in predicting good dietary compliance were calculated using the multivariable logistic regression model. CDgc group predominantly (78.3 %) exhibited a basal pattern, and none exhibited an apical. Conversely, most CDpc and nCD patients showed mixed (66.7 % and 73.6 %, respectively) and apical (9.5 % and 25.3 %) patterns. Non-atrophic Marsh types (p = 0.040) and basal pattern (p = 0.043) were independent parameters predicting good dietary compliance. This study first showed that IEL localizations can indicate GFD compliance in samples from CD patients. Localization-based examination of IELs can be an additional histological indicator in monitoring GFD compliance and signs of recovery, especially in adult CD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50768,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology","volume":"75 ","pages":"152438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Diagnostic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2025.152438","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The correlation between clinical, serological, and endoscopic findings and histological response after a gluten-free diet (GFD) is limited in adult celiac (CD) patients. This study aims to evaluate the effects of GFD on intraepithelial lymphocyte (IEL) localization by comparing the histopathological, clinical, serological, and endoscopic findings of adult CD patients. The patients (n = 131) were divided into three groups: those with good (CDgc) (n = 23) and poor (CDpc) (n = 21) GFD compliance and newly diagnosed ones (nCD) (n = 87). Total and supranuclear IELs were counted per 100 enterocytes and divided into three groups: apical, mixed, and basal, according to ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) analysis. The roles of clinicopathological parameters in predicting good dietary compliance were calculated using the multivariable logistic regression model. CDgc group predominantly (78.3 %) exhibited a basal pattern, and none exhibited an apical. Conversely, most CDpc and nCD patients showed mixed (66.7 % and 73.6 %, respectively) and apical (9.5 % and 25.3 %) patterns. Non-atrophic Marsh types (p = 0.040) and basal pattern (p = 0.043) were independent parameters predicting good dietary compliance. This study first showed that IEL localizations can indicate GFD compliance in samples from CD patients. Localization-based examination of IELs can be an additional histological indicator in monitoring GFD compliance and signs of recovery, especially in adult CD patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔疾病随访中的一个新的组织形态学发现:上皮内淋巴细胞定位是饮食依从性的可靠指标。
在成人乳糜泻(CD)患者中,无麸质饮食(GFD)后的临床、血清学和内镜检查结果与组织学反应之间的相关性有限。本研究旨在通过比较成年CD患者的组织病理学、临床、血清学和内镜检查结果,评估GFD对上皮内淋巴细胞(IEL)定位的影响。131例患者分为三组:CDgc依从性良好(n = 23)组、CDpc依从性较差(n = 21)组和新诊断的(nCD)组(n = 87)。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,计算每100个肠细胞的总IELs和核上IELs,并将其分为根尖、混合和基础三组。使用多变量logistic回归模型计算临床病理参数在预测良好饮食依从性中的作用。CDgc组以基底型为主(78.3%),无根尖型。相反,大多数CDpc和nCD患者表现为混合型(分别为66.7%和73.6%)和根尖型(分别为9.5%和25.3%)。非萎缩性Marsh型(p = 0.040)和基底型(p = 0.043)是预测良好饮食依从性的独立参数。该研究首次表明,IEL定位可以指示CD患者样本的GFD依从性。基于定位的IELs检查可以作为监测GFD依从性和恢复迹象的额外组织学指标,特别是在成人CD患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
149
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: A peer-reviewed journal devoted to the publication of articles dealing with traditional morphologic studies using standard diagnostic techniques and stressing clinicopathological correlations and scientific observation of relevance to the daily practice of pathology. Special features include pathologic-radiologic correlations and pathologic-cytologic correlations.
期刊最新文献
GPNMB expression differentiates subependymal giant cell astrocytoma from other mimickers. Assessing the predictive value of Ki-67 and progesterone receptor algorithms for recurrence and disease-free survival in meningiomas. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of stromal p16 and p53 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Gamna-Gandy bodies in renal neoplasms: A multi-institutional clinicopathologic study of 350 consecutive nephrectomies. A new histomorphological finding in the follow-up of celiac disease: Intraepithelial lymphocyte localization is a reliable indicator of dietary compliance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1