Challenges and opportunities for validation of AI-based new approach methods.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14573/altex.2412291
Thomas Hartung, Nicole Kleinstreuer
{"title":"Challenges and opportunities for validation of AI-based new approach methods.","authors":"Thomas Hartung, Nicole Kleinstreuer","doi":"10.14573/altex.2412291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into new approach methods (NAMs) for toxicology rep-resents a paradigm shift in chemical safety assessment. Harnessing AI appropriately has enormous potential to streamline validation efforts. This review explores the challenges, opportunities, and future directions for validating AI-based NAMs, highlighting their transformative potential while acknowledging the complexities involved in their implementation and acceptance. We discuss key hurdles such as data quality, model interpretability, and regulatory acceptance, alongside opportunities including enhanced predictive power and efficient data integration. The concept of e-validation, an AI-powered framework for streamlining NAM validation, is presented as a comprehensive strategy to overcome limitations of traditional validation approaches, leveraging AI-powered modules for reference chemical selection, study simulation, mechanistic validation, and model training and evaluation. We propose robust validation strategies, including tiered approaches, performance benchmarking, uncertainty quantification, and cross-validation across diverse datasets. The importance of ongoing monitoring and refinement post-implementation is emphasized, addressing the dynamic nature of AI models. We consider ethical implications and the need for human oversight in AI-driven toxicology and outline the impact of trends in AI devel-opment, research priorities, and a vision for the integration of AI-based NAMs in toxicological practice, calling for collaboration among researchers, regulators, and industry stakeholders. We describe the vision of companion AI post-validation agents to keep methods and their validity status current. By addressing these challenges and opportunities, the scientific community can harness the potential of AI to enhance predictive toxicology while reducing reliance on traditional animal testing and increasing human relevance and translational capabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51231,"journal":{"name":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","volume":"42 1","pages":"3-21"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2412291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into new approach methods (NAMs) for toxicology rep-resents a paradigm shift in chemical safety assessment. Harnessing AI appropriately has enormous potential to streamline validation efforts. This review explores the challenges, opportunities, and future directions for validating AI-based NAMs, highlighting their transformative potential while acknowledging the complexities involved in their implementation and acceptance. We discuss key hurdles such as data quality, model interpretability, and regulatory acceptance, alongside opportunities including enhanced predictive power and efficient data integration. The concept of e-validation, an AI-powered framework for streamlining NAM validation, is presented as a comprehensive strategy to overcome limitations of traditional validation approaches, leveraging AI-powered modules for reference chemical selection, study simulation, mechanistic validation, and model training and evaluation. We propose robust validation strategies, including tiered approaches, performance benchmarking, uncertainty quantification, and cross-validation across diverse datasets. The importance of ongoing monitoring and refinement post-implementation is emphasized, addressing the dynamic nature of AI models. We consider ethical implications and the need for human oversight in AI-driven toxicology and outline the impact of trends in AI devel-opment, research priorities, and a vision for the integration of AI-based NAMs in toxicological practice, calling for collaboration among researchers, regulators, and industry stakeholders. We describe the vision of companion AI post-validation agents to keep methods and their validity status current. By addressing these challenges and opportunities, the scientific community can harness the potential of AI to enhance predictive toxicology while reducing reliance on traditional animal testing and increasing human relevance and translational capabilities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于人工智能的新方法验证的挑战和机遇。
将人工智能(AI)集成到毒理学的新方法(NAMs)中代表了化学品安全评估的范式转变。适当地利用人工智能在简化验证工作方面具有巨大的潜力。本文探讨了验证基于人工智能的NAMs的挑战、机遇和未来方向,强调了它们的变革潜力,同时承认了其实施和接受过程中的复杂性。我们讨论了数据质量、模型可解释性和监管接受等关键障碍,以及增强预测能力和高效数据集成等机会。电子验证的概念是一种简化NAM验证的人工智能框架,它是一种克服传统验证方法局限性的综合策略,利用人工智能驱动的模块进行参考化学选择、研究模拟、机制验证以及模型训练和评估。我们提出了稳健的验证策略,包括分层方法、性能基准、不确定性量化和跨不同数据集的交叉验证。强调了持续监测和改进实施后的重要性,解决了人工智能模型的动态性。我们考虑了人工智能驱动毒理学的伦理影响和人类监督的必要性,概述了人工智能发展趋势的影响、研究重点,以及将基于人工智能的NAMs整合到毒理学实践中的愿景,呼吁研究人员、监管机构和行业利益相关者之间进行合作。我们描述了同伴AI验证后代理的愿景,以保持方法及其有效性状态的最新状态。通过应对这些挑战和机遇,科学界可以利用人工智能的潜力来增强预测毒理学,同时减少对传统动物试验的依赖,并提高人类相关性和转化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation
Altex-Alternatives To Animal Experimentation MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ALTEX publishes original articles, short communications, reviews, as well as news and comments and meeting reports. Manuscripts submitted to ALTEX are evaluated by two expert reviewers. The evaluation takes into account the scientific merit of a manuscript and its contribution to animal welfare and the 3R principle.
期刊最新文献
Determining a point of departure for skin sensitization potency and quantitative risk assessment of fragrance ingredients using the GARDskin dose-response assay. Biology-inspired dynamic microphysiological system approaches to revolutionize basic research, healthcare and animal welfare. AOPs to connect food additives' effects on gut microbiota to health outcomes. Mapping out strategies to further develop human-relevant, new approach methodology (NAM)-based developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing. Predicting acute oral toxicity using AcutoX: An animal product-free and metabolically relevant human cell-based test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1