Intensive care unit nurses’ redeployment experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Australian Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101157
Louise White RN, BSc , Nantanit van Gulik RN, PhD , Jordana Schlieff RN, MSc , Leanne Boyd RN, PhD , Lauren Walker RN, BN , Julie Considine RN, PhD
{"title":"Intensive care unit nurses’ redeployment experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study","authors":"Louise White RN, BSc ,&nbsp;Nantanit van Gulik RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Jordana Schlieff RN, MSc ,&nbsp;Leanne Boyd RN, PhD ,&nbsp;Lauren Walker RN, BN ,&nbsp;Julie Considine RN, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.aucc.2024.101157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The pandemic response required the large-scale redeployment of nurses to support the care of patients with COVID-19. Surveys of staff and analysis of staff feedback indicated that the frequent redeployment of intensive care unit (ICU) registered nurses (RNs) led to dissatisfaction and contributed to voluntary reductions in hours and increased intentions to resign. Whilst much is understood about the redeployment of non-ICU RNs into ICUs to support patient care during periods of high demand, less is known about ICU RNs’ experiences of being redeployed to general wards. ICU RNs are often required to work in other areas to cover staff shortages within the organisation when ICU beds are available.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The aim of this study was to explore ICU RNs’ experiences of redeployment to hospital wards during 2021 and 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 26 ICU RNs was conducted at three hospitals within a major health service in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were interviewed in July 2023. Transcribed audio recordings of interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six major themes and 12 subthemes were constructed from the data: (i) risk (subthemes: absenteeism, bad for patients—ICU and ward); (ii) choice (subthemes: no choice, security of the ICU); (iii) lost (subthemes: lack of orientation, unfamiliar everything); (iv) distress (subthemes: clinical and emotional stress); (v) a number (subthemes: undervalued, unfair); and (vi) positive perspectives (subthemes: good experience, has to happen, helping out).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ICU RNs’ experiences of redeployment out of the ICU were predominantly negative. However, positive aspects were noted regarding the support of colleagues during staff shortages and the opportunity to provide care to patients. The findings highlight the risks associated with redeployment and its impact on both the ICU and the broader health service. Suggested strategies include implementing through orientation practices, adopting a sustainable team nursing approach, and prioritising staff wellbeing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51239,"journal":{"name":"Australian Critical Care","volume":"38 3","pages":"Article 101157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1036731424003084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The pandemic response required the large-scale redeployment of nurses to support the care of patients with COVID-19. Surveys of staff and analysis of staff feedback indicated that the frequent redeployment of intensive care unit (ICU) registered nurses (RNs) led to dissatisfaction and contributed to voluntary reductions in hours and increased intentions to resign. Whilst much is understood about the redeployment of non-ICU RNs into ICUs to support patient care during periods of high demand, less is known about ICU RNs’ experiences of being redeployed to general wards. ICU RNs are often required to work in other areas to cover staff shortages within the organisation when ICU beds are available.

Aim

The aim of this study was to explore ICU RNs’ experiences of redeployment to hospital wards during 2021 and 2022.

Methods

A descriptive qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 26 ICU RNs was conducted at three hospitals within a major health service in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were interviewed in July 2023. Transcribed audio recordings of interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Six major themes and 12 subthemes were constructed from the data: (i) risk (subthemes: absenteeism, bad for patients—ICU and ward); (ii) choice (subthemes: no choice, security of the ICU); (iii) lost (subthemes: lack of orientation, unfamiliar everything); (iv) distress (subthemes: clinical and emotional stress); (v) a number (subthemes: undervalued, unfair); and (vi) positive perspectives (subthemes: good experience, has to happen, helping out).

Conclusion

ICU RNs’ experiences of redeployment out of the ICU were predominantly negative. However, positive aspects were noted regarding the support of colleagues during staff shortages and the opportunity to provide care to patients. The findings highlight the risks associated with redeployment and its impact on both the ICU and the broader health service. Suggested strategies include implementing through orientation practices, adopting a sustainable team nursing approach, and prioritising staff wellbeing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间重症监护室护士重新部署经验:一项定性研究
背景:大流行应对需要大规模重新部署护士,以支持COVID-19患者的护理。对员工的调查和对员工反馈的分析表明,频繁重新部署重症监护室(ICU)注册护士(RNs)会导致不满,并导致自愿减少工作时间和增加辞职意向。虽然对在高需求期间将非ICU注册护士重新部署到ICU以支持患者护理有很多了解,但对ICU注册护士被重新部署到普通病房的经验知之甚少。当ICU床位可用时,ICU注册护士经常被要求在其他领域工作,以弥补组织内的人员短缺。目的:本研究的目的是探讨ICU注册护士在2021年和2022年期间重新部署到医院病房的经验。方法:采用半结构化访谈对澳大利亚墨尔本一家主要卫生服务机构的三家医院的26名ICU注册护士进行描述性定性研究。参与者于2023年7月接受采访。使用反身性专题分析对采访录音进行了分析。结果:根据数据构建了6个主要主题和12个次要主题:(i)风险(次要主题:缺勤,对患者不利- icu和病房);(ii)选择(分主题:别无选择,ICU的安全);(iii)迷失(次要主题:缺乏方向,对一切都不熟悉);(iv)痛苦(分主题:临床和情绪压力);一个数字(分主题:低估、不公平);(vi)积极的观点(副主题:良好的体验,必须发生,帮助)。结论:ICU注册护士转出ICU的经历以负面为主。然而,在工作人员短缺期间同事的支持和为病人提供护理的机会方面,也注意到积极的方面。调查结果强调了重新部署的相关风险及其对ICU和更广泛的卫生服务的影响。建议的策略包括通过入职培训实践实施,采用可持续的团队护理方法,以及优先考虑员工的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Critical Care
Australian Critical Care NURSING-NURSING
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Critical Care is the official journal of the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). It is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal, providing clinically relevant research, reviews and articles of interest to the critical care community. Australian Critical Care publishes peer-reviewed scholarly papers that report research findings, research-based reviews, discussion papers and commentaries which are of interest to an international readership of critical care practitioners, educators, administrators and researchers. Interprofessional articles are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Wellbeing as perceived and experienced by intensive care unit nurses: An interpretive qualitative analysis Employer-provided wellbeing support for nurses working in intensive care units: A national cross-sectional study Understanding crisis needs among family caregivers of patients in critical care: A qualitative analysis Antidepressant use, but not polypharmacy, is associated with worse outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest in older people “Because I couldn't understand and respond”: A mixed-method study examining the impact of language barriers on patient experiences of intensive care unit outreach team care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1