Recurrence, Return to Sport, and Reoperation Rates Appear Similar Between Males and Females After Surgery for Anterior Shoulder Instability: Future Research Requires Disaggregation by Sex.

Kenneth T Nguyen, Patrick C Ryan, Erin L Brown, Shreya M Saraf, Mia V Rumps, Mary K Mulcahey
{"title":"Recurrence, Return to Sport, and Reoperation Rates Appear Similar Between Males and Females After Surgery for Anterior Shoulder Instability: Future Research Requires Disaggregation by Sex.","authors":"Kenneth T Nguyen, Patrick C Ryan, Erin L Brown, Shreya M Saraf, Mia V Rumps, Mary K Mulcahey","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate sex-based disparities in outcomes following surgery for anterior shoulder instability and to assess the quality of the current literature on this topic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a June 2023 database search (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cinahl) identified Level I to III clinical studies on anterior shoulder instability (January 2003 to May 2023). Eligible studies included male and female outcomes after anterior shoulder stabilization. Systematic reviews, case reports, and case series were excluded. A meta-analysis examined sex-specific results: recurrence, reoperation, return to sport, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search identified 7,028 studies, with 14 meeting inclusion criteria, totaling 1,262 patients (73.9% male, 26.1% female). Of the studies, 53% were excluded due to failure to disaggregate by sex. The meta-analysis found comparable outcomes by sex for recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.50; P = .77), reoperation rate (OR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.69-1.02; P = .08), or return to sport (OR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.54-2.22; P = .81) after arthroscopic Bankart, open Bankart, and open Latarjet procedures. Mean ASES scores were 91.08 ± 13.59 standard error of the mean (SEM) for males and 89.85 ± 16.73 SEM for females, while WOSI scores were 81.32 ± 19.23 SEM and 87.26 ± 14.09 SEM, respectively. Comparable outcomes were found in ASES (mean difference = -1.20; 95% CI, -4.28 to 1.88; P = .45) or WOSI scores (mean difference = 4.94; 95% CI, -0.31 to 10.00; P = .06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recurrence, return to sport, and reoperation rates were similar between males and females after arthroscopic Bankart, open Bankart, and open Latarjet procedures. Comparable outcomes were found in postoperative ASES and WOSI scores between sexes. Most relevant studies were excluded due to lack of disaggregation by sex, limiting the certainty of the conclusion and suggesting an opportunity to improve future research.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, systematic review of Level I and III studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.091","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate sex-based disparities in outcomes following surgery for anterior shoulder instability and to assess the quality of the current literature on this topic.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a June 2023 database search (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cinahl) identified Level I to III clinical studies on anterior shoulder instability (January 2003 to May 2023). Eligible studies included male and female outcomes after anterior shoulder stabilization. Systematic reviews, case reports, and case series were excluded. A meta-analysis examined sex-specific results: recurrence, reoperation, return to sport, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability (WOSI) index.

Results: The initial search identified 7,028 studies, with 14 meeting inclusion criteria, totaling 1,262 patients (73.9% male, 26.1% female). Of the studies, 53% were excluded due to failure to disaggregate by sex. The meta-analysis found comparable outcomes by sex for recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-1.50; P = .77), reoperation rate (OR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.69-1.02; P = .08), or return to sport (OR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.54-2.22; P = .81) after arthroscopic Bankart, open Bankart, and open Latarjet procedures. Mean ASES scores were 91.08 ± 13.59 standard error of the mean (SEM) for males and 89.85 ± 16.73 SEM for females, while WOSI scores were 81.32 ± 19.23 SEM and 87.26 ± 14.09 SEM, respectively. Comparable outcomes were found in ASES (mean difference = -1.20; 95% CI, -4.28 to 1.88; P = .45) or WOSI scores (mean difference = 4.94; 95% CI, -0.31 to 10.00; P = .06).

Conclusions: Recurrence, return to sport, and reoperation rates were similar between males and females after arthroscopic Bankart, open Bankart, and open Latarjet procedures. Comparable outcomes were found in postoperative ASES and WOSI scores between sexes. Most relevant studies were excluded due to lack of disaggregation by sex, limiting the certainty of the conclusion and suggesting an opportunity to improve future research.

Level of evidence: Level III, systematic review of Level I and III studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前肩不稳术后男性和女性的复发率、恢复运动率和再手术率相似:未来的研究需要按性别分类。
目的:本研究的目的是评估肩关节前路不稳手术后结果的性别差异,并评估当前关于该主题的文献质量。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,于2023年6月检索数据库(PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cinahl),确定了2003年1月至2023年5月期间关于前肩不稳的I-III级临床研究。符合条件的研究包括肩部前路稳定后的男性和女性结果。排除了系统评价、病例报告和病例系列。一项荟萃分析检查了性别特异性结果:复发、再手术、恢复运动、ASES评分和WOSI指数。结果:最初的检索确定了7028项研究,其中14项符合纳入标准,共计1262例患者(73.9%男性,26.1%女性)。53%的研究因未能按性别分类而被排除。荟萃分析发现,不同性别的复发结果具有可比性(OR = 1.05;95% ci = 0.74-1.50;P = 0.77),再手术率(OR = 0.84;95% ci = 0.69-1.02;P = 0.08),或RTS (or = 1.09;95% ci = 0.54-2.22;P = .81),分别接受关节镜Bankart、开放式Bankart和开放式Latarjet手术。男性和女性的平均as评分分别为91.08±13.59和89.85±16.73,而WOSI评分分别为81.32±19.23和87.26±14.09。在asa中也发现了类似的结果(MD = -1.20;95% ci = -4.28-1.88;P = 0.45)或WOSI评分(MD = 4.94;95% ci = -0.31-10.00;P = .06)。结论:在关节镜Bankart、开放式Bankart和开放式Latarjet手术后,男性和女性的复发率、恢复运动率和再手术率相似。术后的as和WOSI评分在性别间也有可比性。由于缺乏性别分类,大多数相关研究被排除在外,限制了结论的确定性,并为改进未来的研究提供了机会。证据等级:III级,对I级和III级研究的系统评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum Corrigendum Announcements Editorial Board Masthead
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1