Large-bore aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of pulmonary embolism in octogenarians.

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CVIR Endovascular Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s42155-025-00517-2
Reid Masterson, Travis Pebror, Andrew Gauger, Adam William Schmitz, Sabah David Butty
{"title":"Large-bore aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of pulmonary embolism in octogenarians.","authors":"Reid Masterson, Travis Pebror, Andrew Gauger, Adam William Schmitz, Sabah David Butty","doi":"10.1186/s42155-025-00517-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate outcomes in patients aged ≥ 80 years following large-bore aspiration thrombectomy (LBAT) for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All patients ≥ 80 years of age with PE treated via LBAT at a single center were analyzed from September 2019 - August 2024. This included the octogenarian subgroup from a recently published retrospective analysis assessing all PE patients treated with LBAT at our center between September 2019 and January 2023. The following outcomes were evaluated: technical success, change in several hemodynamic measures including pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and right ventricle to left ventricle ratio (RV to LV ratio), length of hospital and intensive-care-unit (ICU) stay, procedure-related complications, and 7- and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patients aged ≥ 80 years underwent LBAT procedures for PE. Technical success was achieved in 46 cases (95.8%). The mean reduction in mean PAP was 3.6 mmHg. The mean reduction in RV to LV ratio was -0.42. The mean length of postprocedural hospital and ICU stays were 5.7 ± 3.6 days and 1.0 ± 1.6 days, respectively. There were 2 procedural complications, 1 pulmonary vascular injury involving a pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm and 1 decompensation involving hypotension requiring vasopressor support. There were no major bleeding complications or cardiac injuries. All-cause mortality was 2.1% (n = 1) at 7 days and 6.3% (n = 3) at 30 days post procedure. PE-related mortality was 2.1% (n = 1) at 30 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LBAT is a technically feasible procedure for the treatment of PE in octogenarian patients and has a favorable preliminary safety and mortality profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":"8 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754570/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-025-00517-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate outcomes in patients aged ≥ 80 years following large-bore aspiration thrombectomy (LBAT) for the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE).

Materials and methods: All patients ≥ 80 years of age with PE treated via LBAT at a single center were analyzed from September 2019 - August 2024. This included the octogenarian subgroup from a recently published retrospective analysis assessing all PE patients treated with LBAT at our center between September 2019 and January 2023. The following outcomes were evaluated: technical success, change in several hemodynamic measures including pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and right ventricle to left ventricle ratio (RV to LV ratio), length of hospital and intensive-care-unit (ICU) stay, procedure-related complications, and 7- and 30-day mortality.

Results: Forty-eight patients aged ≥ 80 years underwent LBAT procedures for PE. Technical success was achieved in 46 cases (95.8%). The mean reduction in mean PAP was 3.6 mmHg. The mean reduction in RV to LV ratio was -0.42. The mean length of postprocedural hospital and ICU stays were 5.7 ± 3.6 days and 1.0 ± 1.6 days, respectively. There were 2 procedural complications, 1 pulmonary vascular injury involving a pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysm and 1 decompensation involving hypotension requiring vasopressor support. There were no major bleeding complications or cardiac injuries. All-cause mortality was 2.1% (n = 1) at 7 days and 6.3% (n = 3) at 30 days post procedure. PE-related mortality was 2.1% (n = 1) at 30 days.

Conclusion: LBAT is a technically feasible procedure for the treatment of PE in octogenarian patients and has a favorable preliminary safety and mortality profile.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大口径抽吸取栓术治疗八旬老人肺栓塞。
目的:评价≥80岁大口径吸入性取栓术(LBAT)治疗肺栓塞(PE)患者的预后。材料和方法:对2019年9月至2024年8月在单一中心接受LBAT治疗的所有≥80岁PE患者进行分析。这包括最近发表的一项回顾性分析中的八十多岁亚组,该分析评估了2019年9月至2023年1月期间在我们中心接受LBAT治疗的所有PE患者。评估了以下结果:技术成功、多项血流动力学指标的改变,包括肺动脉压(PAP)、右心室与左心室比(RV / LV比)、住院时间和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、手术相关并发症、7天和30天死亡率。结果:48例年龄≥80岁的患者接受了LBAT手术治疗PE。技术成功46例(95.8%)。平均PAP降低3.6 mmHg。RV / LV比值平均降低-0.42。术后住院时间平均为5.7±3.6天,ICU住院时间平均为1.0±1.6天。有2例手术并发症,1例肺血管损伤涉及肺动脉假性动脉瘤,1例代偿失代偿涉及低血压需要血管加压药物支持。无大出血并发症或心脏损伤。术后7天全因死亡率为2.1% (n = 1), 30天全因死亡率为6.3% (n = 3)。30天pe相关死亡率为2.1% (n = 1)。结论:LBAT是一种技术上可行的治疗80岁高龄PE的方法,具有良好的初步安全性和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CVIR Endovascular
CVIR Endovascular Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊最新文献
Axillo-caval extra-anatomic venous bypass creation via direct percutaneous puncture of the superior vena cava. Percutaneous Closure Device Controlled INCRAFT Stentgraft Implantation Registry (PUCCINI). Percutaneous large-bore mechanical thrombectomy for macroscopic fat pulmonary embolism: a case report. Postoperative symptom changes following uterine artery embolization for uterine fibroid based on FIGO classification. Large-bore aspiration thrombectomy for the treatment of pulmonary embolism in octogenarians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1