Growth of Private Equity and Hospital Consolidation in Primary Care and Price Implications.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4935
Yashaswini Singh, Nandita Radhakrishnan, Loren Adler, Christopher Whaley
{"title":"Growth of Private Equity and Hospital Consolidation in Primary Care and Price Implications.","authors":"Yashaswini Singh, Nandita Radhakrishnan, Loren Adler, Christopher Whaley","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Consolidation of physician practices by hospitals and private equity (PE) firms has increased rapidly. This trend is of particular importance within primary care. Despite its significance, there is no systematic evidence on the emerging trends in ownership affiliation of primary care physicians (PCPs) and its association with prices paid for physician services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe trends in hospital affiliation and PE affiliation in primary care and examine variation in negotiated prices paid by commercial insurers to hospital-affiliated, PE-affiliated, and independent PCPs.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Data from PitchBook and IQVIA were used to examine hospital and PE affiliation PCPs. PCPs and their affiliations were linked to novel cross-sectional Transparency in Coverage data. A total of 226.6 million negotiated prices were analyzed for evaluation and management office visits (Current Procedural Terminology codes 99202 to 99205 and 99212 to 99215) across 4 national insurers (Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cigna, and United Healthcare). Linear regressions were used to examine the association between hospital-affiliated, PE-affiliated, and independent PCPs and cross-sectional prices paid for physician services, with fixed effects for service, state, and insurers. Data were collected from January to June 2024, and data were analyzed from July to October 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The proportion of PCPs that are affiliated with hospitals and PE from 2009 to 2022. Using cross-sectional data from 2022, negotiated prices paid to physicians (physician professional fee) for office visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 198 097 PCPs were analyzed. PCPs affiliated with hospitals increased from 25.2% (28 216 of 111 793) in 2009 to 47.9% in 2022 (82 890 of 172 964). Over the same period, 1.5% (2483 of 172 964) of PCPs became affiliated with PE firms. Relative to independent PCPs, negotiated prices for office visits were $14.91 (95% CI, 8.92-27.64) or 10.7% (95% CI, 10.1-11.4) higher for hospital-affiliated PCPs (P < .001) and $9.56 (95% CI, 2.24-14.55) or 7.8% (95% CI, 4.7-10.8) higher for PE-affiliated PCPs (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, nearly one-half of all PCPs were affiliated with hospitals, while PE-affiliated PCPs were growing and concentrated in certain regional markets. Relative to PCPs in independent settings, hospital-affiliated PCPs and PE-affiliated PCPs had higher prices for the same services.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 1","pages":"e244935"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Consolidation of physician practices by hospitals and private equity (PE) firms has increased rapidly. This trend is of particular importance within primary care. Despite its significance, there is no systematic evidence on the emerging trends in ownership affiliation of primary care physicians (PCPs) and its association with prices paid for physician services.

Objective: To describe trends in hospital affiliation and PE affiliation in primary care and examine variation in negotiated prices paid by commercial insurers to hospital-affiliated, PE-affiliated, and independent PCPs.

Design, setting, and participants: Data from PitchBook and IQVIA were used to examine hospital and PE affiliation PCPs. PCPs and their affiliations were linked to novel cross-sectional Transparency in Coverage data. A total of 226.6 million negotiated prices were analyzed for evaluation and management office visits (Current Procedural Terminology codes 99202 to 99205 and 99212 to 99215) across 4 national insurers (Aetna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, Cigna, and United Healthcare). Linear regressions were used to examine the association between hospital-affiliated, PE-affiliated, and independent PCPs and cross-sectional prices paid for physician services, with fixed effects for service, state, and insurers. Data were collected from January to June 2024, and data were analyzed from July to October 2024.

Main outcomes and measures: The proportion of PCPs that are affiliated with hospitals and PE from 2009 to 2022. Using cross-sectional data from 2022, negotiated prices paid to physicians (physician professional fee) for office visits.

Results: A total of 198 097 PCPs were analyzed. PCPs affiliated with hospitals increased from 25.2% (28 216 of 111 793) in 2009 to 47.9% in 2022 (82 890 of 172 964). Over the same period, 1.5% (2483 of 172 964) of PCPs became affiliated with PE firms. Relative to independent PCPs, negotiated prices for office visits were $14.91 (95% CI, 8.92-27.64) or 10.7% (95% CI, 10.1-11.4) higher for hospital-affiliated PCPs (P < .001) and $9.56 (95% CI, 2.24-14.55) or 7.8% (95% CI, 4.7-10.8) higher for PE-affiliated PCPs (P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cross-sectional study, nearly one-half of all PCPs were affiliated with hospitals, while PE-affiliated PCPs were growing and concentrated in certain regional markets. Relative to PCPs in independent settings, hospital-affiliated PCPs and PE-affiliated PCPs had higher prices for the same services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级保健领域私募股权和医院合并的增长及其价格影响。
重要性:医院和私募股权(PE)公司医师业务的整合迅速增加。这一趋势在初级保健领域尤为重要。尽管具有重要意义,但没有系统的证据表明初级保健医生(pcp)所有权归属的新趋势及其与医生服务支付价格的关系。目的:描述初级保健中医院附属机构和私人医疗机构附属机构的趋势,并检查商业保险公司向医院附属机构、私人医疗机构附属机构和独立私人医疗机构支付的议价变化。设计、设置和参与者:使用PitchBook和IQVIA的数据来检查医院和PE附属的pcp。pcp及其附属机构与新型的横截面覆盖透明度数据相关联。对4家全国性保险公司(Aetna、Blue Cross Blue Shield、Cigna和United Healthcare)的评估和管理办公室访问(现行程序术语代码99202至99205和99212至99215)进行了2.266亿次协商价格分析。线性回归用于检验医院附属、pe附属和独立pcp与医生服务支付的横截面价格之间的关系,对服务、州和保险公司有固定影响。数据采集时间为2024年1 - 6月,数据分析时间为2024年7 - 10月。主要结果与措施:2009年至2022年,医院附属私立医院与私立医院的比例。使用2022年的横断面数据,支付给医生的办公室就诊协商价格(医生专业费用)。结果:共分析198份 097份pcp。医院附属pcp从2009年的25.2%(111 793人中有28 216人)增加到2022年的47.9%(172 964人中有82 890人)。同期,172家pcp中有2483家( 964家)加入了私募股权公司。与独立的pcp相比,医院附属pcp的办公室就诊议价要高出14.91美元(95% CI, 8.92-27.64)或10.7% (95% CI, 10.1-11.4) (P结论和相关性:在这项横断面研究中,近一半的pcp隶属于医院,而pe附属pcp正在增长,并集中在某些区域市场。相对于独立机构的pcp,医院附属的pcp和pe附属的pcp对相同的服务有更高的价格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
New FDA Policies Could Limit the Full Value of AI in Medicine. Changes in US Primary Care Access and Capabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Errors in Figure. JAMA Health Forum. Recognizing and Strengthening the 4 Pillars of US Childhood Vaccine Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1