Blind spots in brain imaging: a pictorial essay.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-02 Epub Date: 2024-12-30 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-1270
Mengwen Liu, Xin Wen, Meng Li, Qiang Huang, Chengyi Jiang, Jiuming Jiang, Li Zhang, Hongmei Zhang
{"title":"Blind spots in brain imaging: a pictorial essay.","authors":"Mengwen Liu, Xin Wen, Meng Li, Qiang Huang, Chengyi Jiang, Jiuming Jiang, Li Zhang, Hongmei Zhang","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-1270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, radiologists must interpret large quantities of images and identify diseases on a daily basis. The minimization of errors is crucial for high-quality diagnostic imaging and optimal patient care. Brain imaging is frequently used in clinical practice; however, radiologists are prone to overlook some regions in brain imaging and make perceptual errors, thus leading to missed diagnoses. These regions, also known as \"blind spots\", comprise a number of intricate areas, including the posterior fossa, cerebral sulci and pia mater, cranial nerves (CNs), intracranial arteries, dural sinuses, sella and parasellar region, Meckel's cave, skull base, scalp, orbit, and pterygopalatine fossa (PPF). Therefore, the knowledge of normal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations and common lesions in these blind spots is imperative to avoid false-negative results. This article graphically discusses and analyzes these common blind spots of brain imaging using real representative cases. It also provides comprehensive strategies to address missed diagnostic errors in radiology, including enhancing the selection of imaging protocols, implementing a multi-reviewer reporting system, adopting structured reporting templates, employing error measurement or detection strategies, and promoting the use, development, and refinement of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This article may also increase junior doctors' awareness of these blind spots and assist them in their daily work, and thus has continuing education implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"15 1","pages":"1023-1039"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-1270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, radiologists must interpret large quantities of images and identify diseases on a daily basis. The minimization of errors is crucial for high-quality diagnostic imaging and optimal patient care. Brain imaging is frequently used in clinical practice; however, radiologists are prone to overlook some regions in brain imaging and make perceptual errors, thus leading to missed diagnoses. These regions, also known as "blind spots", comprise a number of intricate areas, including the posterior fossa, cerebral sulci and pia mater, cranial nerves (CNs), intracranial arteries, dural sinuses, sella and parasellar region, Meckel's cave, skull base, scalp, orbit, and pterygopalatine fossa (PPF). Therefore, the knowledge of normal computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manifestations and common lesions in these blind spots is imperative to avoid false-negative results. This article graphically discusses and analyzes these common blind spots of brain imaging using real representative cases. It also provides comprehensive strategies to address missed diagnostic errors in radiology, including enhancing the selection of imaging protocols, implementing a multi-reviewer reporting system, adopting structured reporting templates, employing error measurement or detection strategies, and promoting the use, development, and refinement of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This article may also increase junior doctors' awareness of these blind spots and assist them in their daily work, and thus has continuing education implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑成像中的盲点:一篇图片文章。
目前,放射科医生每天必须解读大量图像并识别疾病。最大限度地减少错误对于高质量的诊断成像和最佳的患者护理至关重要。脑成像在临床实践中经常使用;然而,放射科医生容易忽略脑成像的某些区域,产生感知错误,从而导致漏诊。这些区域也被称为“盲点”,由许多复杂的区域组成,包括后窝、脑沟和硬脑膜、脑神经(CNs)、颅内动脉、硬脑膜窦、鞍区和鞍旁区、梅克尔洞穴、颅底、头皮、眼眶和翼腭窝(PPF)。因此,了解这些盲点的正常计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)表现和常见病变是必要的,以避免假阴性结果。本文结合真实的代表性病例,对这些常见的脑成像盲点进行了图形化的讨论和分析。它还提供了解决放射学漏诊错误的综合策略,包括加强成像方案的选择,实施多审稿人报告系统,采用结构化报告模板,采用误差测量或检测策略,以及促进人工智能(AI)的使用,开发和改进,以提高诊断准确性和效率。本文也可以提高初级医生对这些盲点的认识,帮助他们在日常工作中发挥作用,从而具有继续教育的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
A case of "malignant" congenital heart disease with abnormal left coronary origin. Enhancing photon-counting computed tomography reconstruction via subspace dictionary learning and spatial sparsity regularization. Texture analysis combined with machine learning in radiographs of the knee joint: potential to identify tibial plateau occult fractures. A comparative study of 4-hook anchor device with methylene blue for preoperative pulmonary nodule localization. Thalamic functional connectivity on 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and its relation to motor signs in early-stage Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1