Muzammil Akhtar, Sonia Aamer, Mohammad Asad, Daniel Razick, Mustafa Jundi, Trevor Shelton
{"title":"Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using synthetic suture tape: A systematic review of biomechanical and clinical outcomes.","authors":"Muzammil Akhtar, Sonia Aamer, Mohammad Asad, Daniel Razick, Mustafa Jundi, Trevor Shelton","doi":"10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To review outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) using synthetic suture tape in biomechanical and clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed in three databases. Studies reporting biomechanical and/or clinical outcomes of MPFLR using synthetic suture tape were included. For clinical studies, the primary outcome measures included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three biomechanical studies were included. One study reported stronger integrity of fixation with suture tape versus semitendinosus autografts. One study reported similar integrity of MPFLR with knotless anchor versus soft tissue fixation. Another study found suture tape fixation between 60° and 90° of knee flexion to avoid excessive medial patellofemoral joint contact pressure after MPFLR. Eight clinical studies with 287 patients and 317 knees (36.1 % male, pooled mean age: 23.2 years old, pooled mean follow-up: 41.6 months) were included. All studies reported significant preoperative to postoperative improvement for all PROs except for the Tegner score in one study. The range of PROs were as follows (preoperative and postoperative): Lysholm (32.8-72.0 and 78.0 to 96.7), Kujala (36.0-75.2 and 78.8 to 97.7), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (48.6-69.8 and 71.3 to 91.3), and Tegner (1.0-4.6 and 4.0 to 6.5). Two studies comparing suture tape with autografts (quadriceps and gracillis tendons) reported similar postoperative PROs. The pooled rate of adverse postoperative events was 8.2 %. The pooled rate of positive patellar apprehension tests at follow-up was 3.2 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing MPFLR with suture tape fixation achieved significant improvements in PROs and demonstrated low rates of postoperative complications. Compared to autograft fixation, suture tape fixation provided comparable or superior clinical and biomechanical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":53594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","volume":"61 ","pages":"102883"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To review outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) using synthetic suture tape in biomechanical and clinical studies.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in three databases. Studies reporting biomechanical and/or clinical outcomes of MPFLR using synthetic suture tape were included. For clinical studies, the primary outcome measures included patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and adverse events.
Results: Three biomechanical studies were included. One study reported stronger integrity of fixation with suture tape versus semitendinosus autografts. One study reported similar integrity of MPFLR with knotless anchor versus soft tissue fixation. Another study found suture tape fixation between 60° and 90° of knee flexion to avoid excessive medial patellofemoral joint contact pressure after MPFLR. Eight clinical studies with 287 patients and 317 knees (36.1 % male, pooled mean age: 23.2 years old, pooled mean follow-up: 41.6 months) were included. All studies reported significant preoperative to postoperative improvement for all PROs except for the Tegner score in one study. The range of PROs were as follows (preoperative and postoperative): Lysholm (32.8-72.0 and 78.0 to 96.7), Kujala (36.0-75.2 and 78.8 to 97.7), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (48.6-69.8 and 71.3 to 91.3), and Tegner (1.0-4.6 and 4.0 to 6.5). Two studies comparing suture tape with autografts (quadriceps and gracillis tendons) reported similar postoperative PROs. The pooled rate of adverse postoperative events was 8.2 %. The pooled rate of positive patellar apprehension tests at follow-up was 3.2 %.
Conclusions: Patients undergoing MPFLR with suture tape fixation achieved significant improvements in PROs and demonstrated low rates of postoperative complications. Compared to autograft fixation, suture tape fixation provided comparable or superior clinical and biomechanical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma (JCOT) aims to provide its readers with the latest clinical and basic research, and informed opinions that shape today''s orthopedic practice, thereby providing an opportunity to practice evidence-based medicine. With contributions from leading clinicians and researchers around the world, we aim to be the premier journal providing an international perspective advancing knowledge of the musculoskeletal system. JCOT publishes content of value to both general orthopedic practitioners and specialists on all aspects of musculoskeletal research, diagnoses, and treatment. We accept following types of articles: • Original articles focusing on current clinical issues. • Review articles with learning value for professionals as well as students. • Research articles providing the latest in basic biological or engineering research on musculoskeletal diseases. • Regular columns by experts discussing issues affecting the field of orthopedics. • "Symposia" devoted to a single topic offering the general reader an overview of a field, but providing the specialist current in-depth information. • Video of any orthopedic surgery which is innovative and adds to present concepts. • Articles emphasizing or demonstrating a new clinical sign in the art of patient examination is also considered for publication. Contributions from anywhere in the world are welcome and considered on their merits.