The use of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in drug development and clinical trials: A scoping review

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Medical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105798
Camila de Brito Pontes , Antonio Valerio Netto
{"title":"The use of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in drug development and clinical trials: A scoping review","authors":"Camila de Brito Pontes ,&nbsp;Antonio Valerio Netto","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming drug development and clinical trials, helping researchers find new treatments faster and personalize care for patients. By automating tasks like molecule screening and predicting treatment outcomes, AI addresses critical challenges in modern medicine. Objectives: This review explores how AI is being used in drug development and clinical trials, focusing on its benefits, limitations, and potential to improve healthcare outcomes. Methods: A scoping review based on Arksey and O’Malley’s, 2005 framework was conducted, analyzing 1,956 studies from PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus. Ten studies were selected for in-depth analysis. Results: Common AI techniques include Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, and Random Forests, applied in tasks such as identifying new drug uses, predicting antibiotic resistance, and streamlining clinical trials. While AI has shown great promise, challenges like inconsistent data quality and difficulties in clinical validation remain. Conclusions: AI offers exciting opportunities to improve healthcare by making drug development and clinical trials more efficient. However, overcoming barriers like data integration and methodological standardization is essential to ensure these tools benefit diverse populations, especially in settings like Brazil, where genetic diversity and health inequalities pose unique challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 105798"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505625000152","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming drug development and clinical trials, helping researchers find new treatments faster and personalize care for patients. By automating tasks like molecule screening and predicting treatment outcomes, AI addresses critical challenges in modern medicine. Objectives: This review explores how AI is being used in drug development and clinical trials, focusing on its benefits, limitations, and potential to improve healthcare outcomes. Methods: A scoping review based on Arksey and O’Malley’s, 2005 framework was conducted, analyzing 1,956 studies from PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Scopus. Ten studies were selected for in-depth analysis. Results: Common AI techniques include Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, and Random Forests, applied in tasks such as identifying new drug uses, predicting antibiotic resistance, and streamlining clinical trials. While AI has shown great promise, challenges like inconsistent data quality and difficulties in clinical validation remain. Conclusions: AI offers exciting opportunities to improve healthcare by making drug development and clinical trials more efficient. However, overcoming barriers like data integration and methodological standardization is essential to ensure these tools benefit diverse populations, especially in settings like Brazil, where genetic diversity and health inequalities pose unique challenges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能算法在药物开发和临床试验中的应用:范围综述。
背景:人工智能(AI)正在改变药物开发和临床试验,帮助研究人员更快地找到新的治疗方法,并为患者提供个性化护理。通过自动化分子筛选和预测治疗结果等任务,人工智能解决了现代医学中的关键挑战。目的:本综述探讨了人工智能在药物开发和临床试验中的应用,重点关注其益处、局限性和改善医疗保健结果的潜力。方法:基于Arksey和O'Malley的2005框架进行范围综述,分析了PubMed、Web of Science、IEEE explore和Scopus中的1956项研究。选取10项研究进行深入分析。结果:常见的人工智能技术包括支持向量机、神经网络和随机森林,应用于识别新药用途、预测抗生素耐药性和简化临床试验等任务。虽然人工智能显示出巨大的前景,但数据质量不一致和临床验证困难等挑战仍然存在。结论:人工智能通过提高药物开发和临床试验的效率,为改善医疗保健提供了令人兴奋的机会。然而,克服数据整合和方法标准化等障碍对于确保这些工具惠及不同人群至关重要,特别是在遗传多样性和健康不平等构成独特挑战的巴西等国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning for predicting outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review AI-driven triage in emergency departments: A review of benefits, challenges, and future directions Predicting cancer survival at different stages: Insights from fair and explainable machine learning approaches The fading structural prominence of explanations in clinical studies Utilization, challenges, and training needs of digital health technologies: Perspectives from healthcare professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1