Feasibility and acceptability of a telephone-based ACT intervention for caregivers (TACTICs) of adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD): a randomized pilot during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Aging & Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1080/13607863.2025.2453823
Nicole Gavin Hockemeyer, Shelley A Johns, Katherine S Judge, Christina Baucco, Tayler Gowan, James E Slaven, Nicole R Fowler
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of a telephone-based ACT intervention for caregivers (TACTICs) of adults with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD): a randomized pilot during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Nicole Gavin Hockemeyer, Shelley A Johns, Katherine S Judge, Christina Baucco, Tayler Gowan, James E Slaven, Nicole R Fowler","doi":"10.1080/13607863.2025.2453823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the Telephone Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention for Caregivers (TACTICs) on dementia caregivers' anxiety, depression, caregiver burden, suffering, and anticipatory grief.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 2-arm pilot randomized trial with dementia caregivers ≥ 21 years old with clinically elevated anxiety or anxiety-related functional interference. Two cohorts were recruited at the beginning and end of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Intervention participants received 6 telephone sessions delivered by a non-licensed interventionist and control participants received readings and a list of dementia caregiver support groups in their area. Outcomes were measured at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3 and 6 months. Feasibility was measured by enrollment rates, completion rates, and adherence to TACTICs by interventionists. Acceptability was measured with participant satisfaction surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TACTICs was feasible and acceptable with 96% enrollment, 98.6% adherence, 65.5% completion, and a mean satisfaction score of 9.35 out of 10 (SD 0.91). The TACTICs group showed clinically relevant reductions in anxiety post-intervention (SRM 4.1, 95% CI [2.4,5.8]), however reductions were not significantly different from the control group (<i>p</i> = 0.98).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of TACTICs during the COVID-19 pandemic was feasible and acceptable. The preliminary outcomes were not as strong as expected. The results will inform the design of future trials with larger samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":55546,"journal":{"name":"Aging & Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging & Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2025.2453823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the Telephone Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention for Caregivers (TACTICs) on dementia caregivers' anxiety, depression, caregiver burden, suffering, and anticipatory grief.

Method: A 2-arm pilot randomized trial with dementia caregivers ≥ 21 years old with clinically elevated anxiety or anxiety-related functional interference. Two cohorts were recruited at the beginning and end of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Intervention participants received 6 telephone sessions delivered by a non-licensed interventionist and control participants received readings and a list of dementia caregiver support groups in their area. Outcomes were measured at baseline, post-intervention, and at 3 and 6 months. Feasibility was measured by enrollment rates, completion rates, and adherence to TACTICs by interventionists. Acceptability was measured with participant satisfaction surveys.

Results: TACTICs was feasible and acceptable with 96% enrollment, 98.6% adherence, 65.5% completion, and a mean satisfaction score of 9.35 out of 10 (SD 0.91). The TACTICs group showed clinically relevant reductions in anxiety post-intervention (SRM 4.1, 95% CI [2.4,5.8]), however reductions were not significantly different from the control group (p = 0.98).

Conclusion: Implementation of TACTICs during the COVID-19 pandemic was feasible and acceptable. The preliminary outcomes were not as strong as expected. The results will inform the design of future trials with larger samples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症(ADRD)的成人护理人员的基于电话的ACT干预的可行性和可接受性:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的随机试验
目的:探讨照顾者电话接受与承诺治疗干预痴呆照顾者焦虑、抑郁、照顾者负担、痛苦和预期悲伤的可行性、可接受性和初步效果。方法:一项2组随机试验,痴呆护理者≥21岁,伴有临床焦虑升高或焦虑相关功能干扰。在COVID-19大流行第一年的开始和结束时招募了两个队列。参与干预的人接受了6次电话会议由一位无执照的干预专家进行,而对照组的人则接受了阅读材料以及他们所在地区的痴呆症护理支持团体名单。在基线、干预后、3个月和6个月时测量结果。可行性通过入学率、完成率和干预者对TACTICs的依从性来衡量。可接受性通过参与者满意度调查来衡量。结果:TACTICs是可行且可接受的,入组率为96%,依从性为98.6%,完成率为65.5%,平均满意度评分为9.35分(SD 0.91)。干预后,TACTICs组表现出与临床相关的焦虑减少(SRM为4.1,95% CI[2.4,5.8]),但与对照组相比差异无统计学意义(p = 0.98)。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间实施TACTICs是可行且可接受的。初步结果并不像预期的那样强劲。该结果将为未来更大样本试验的设计提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aging & Mental Health
Aging & Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Mental Health provides a leading international forum for the rapidly expanding field which investigates the relationship between the aging process and mental health. The journal addresses the mental changes associated with normal and abnormal or pathological aging, as well as the psychological and psychiatric problems of the aging population. The journal also has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that explore new topics and methods. Aging & Mental Health covers the biological, psychological and social aspects of aging as they relate to mental health. In particular it encourages an integrated approach for examining various biopsychosocial processes and etiological factors associated with psychological changes in the elderly. It also emphasizes the various strategies, therapies and services which may be directed at improving the mental health of the elderly and their families. In this way the journal promotes a strong alliance among the theoretical, experimental and applied sciences across a range of issues affecting mental health and aging. The emphasis of the journal is on rigorous quantitative, and qualitative, research and, high quality innovative studies on emerging topics.
期刊最新文献
Solitude in old age: a scoping review of conceptualisations, associated factors and impacts. Cognitive function in Vietnam: the effects of war exposure and social engagement. Optimal dose and type of non-pharmacological treatments to improve cognitive function in people with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Older adults' subjective aging perceptions, mentalization, and social relationships: a micro-longitudinal study. How do care-related beliefs contribute to depression and anxiety in family caregivers of people with dementia? Testing a cognitive vulnerability-stress model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1