The effect of the guide hole height on the accuracy of implant placement: An in-vitro study

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102232
Soohyeon Kim , Jin-yong Cho , Jaeyoung Ryu
{"title":"The effect of the guide hole height on the accuracy of implant placement: An in-vitro study","authors":"Soohyeon Kim ,&nbsp;Jin-yong Cho ,&nbsp;Jaeyoung Ryu","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Guided implant surgery using three-dimensional (3-D) planning software and 3-D printed surgical guides has become a critical tool for enhancing accuracy. This study aims to determine the minimum guide hole height necessary to maintain implant placement accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Ten maxillary models with edentulous areas were created using CT and optical scan data. Six sites (for each model) were prepared for implant placement with surgical guides fabricated using a 3-D printer. Sixty implants were placed using these guides and divided into five groups according to the guide hole height (1 to 5 mm). After the placement, digital impressions were taken to assess the accuracy of implant positioning. Deviations between planned and actual implant positions were investigated using computer software, and data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Guide holes with 1 mm height (Group Ⅰ) resulted in the highest 3-D deviations (1.12 ± 0.36 and 1.99 ± 0.74 mm at the coronal and apical positions, respectively), with significant errors at the implant apical position compared to groups with taller guide holes (Groups Ⅳ and Ⅴ) (<em>p</em> = 0.005). There were no significant deviations between the 3 mm and 5 mm guide hole heights, with no statistical differences between groups at the x, y, and z-axis in the implant position.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A comparison between the group with a guide hole height of 5 mm on one side and the group with a height of 1 mm on both sides revealed a significant difference in implant placement accuracy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 4","pages":"Article 102232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525000217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Guided implant surgery using three-dimensional (3-D) planning software and 3-D printed surgical guides has become a critical tool for enhancing accuracy. This study aims to determine the minimum guide hole height necessary to maintain implant placement accuracy.

Materials and methods

Ten maxillary models with edentulous areas were created using CT and optical scan data. Six sites (for each model) were prepared for implant placement with surgical guides fabricated using a 3-D printer. Sixty implants were placed using these guides and divided into five groups according to the guide hole height (1 to 5 mm). After the placement, digital impressions were taken to assess the accuracy of implant positioning. Deviations between planned and actual implant positions were investigated using computer software, and data were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests.

Results

Guide holes with 1 mm height (Group Ⅰ) resulted in the highest 3-D deviations (1.12 ± 0.36 and 1.99 ± 0.74 mm at the coronal and apical positions, respectively), with significant errors at the implant apical position compared to groups with taller guide holes (Groups Ⅳ and Ⅴ) (p = 0.005). There were no significant deviations between the 3 mm and 5 mm guide hole heights, with no statistical differences between groups at the x, y, and z-axis in the implant position.

Conclusion

A comparison between the group with a guide hole height of 5 mm on one side and the group with a height of 1 mm on both sides revealed a significant difference in implant placement accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导孔高度对种植体植入精度的影响:一项体外研究。
目的:三维(3-D)规划软件和3-D打印手术导板的应用已成为提高手术精度的重要工具。本研究旨在确定维持种植体放置精度所需的最小导孔高度。材料与方法:利用CT和光学扫描资料制作10个上颌无牙区模型。使用3d打印机制作手术导板,为每个模型准备6个部位进行植入。使用这些导孔放置60个种植体,根据导孔高度(1 ~ 5mm)分为5组。放置后,采用数字印模来评估种植体定位的准确性。使用计算机软件调查计划种植体位置与实际种植体位置之间的偏差,并使用方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行统计分析。结果:1 mm高的导孔(Ⅰ组)在冠状位和根尖位的三维误差最高(分别为1.12±0.36和1.99±0.74 mm),在种植体根尖位置的三维误差与高导孔组(Ⅳ组和Ⅴ组)相比有显著性差异(p = 0.005)。3 mm与5 mm导孔高度差异无统计学意义,组间种植体位置x、y、z轴差异无统计学意义。结论:单侧导孔高度为5mm组与双侧导孔高度为1mm组比较,种植体植入精度有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Novel de novo CLCN7 mutation in refractory osteopetrosis-related osteomyelitis: A case report and multidisciplinary therapeutic dilemmas Use of unleavened bread to reduce the appearance of radiolucent areas associated with the palatoglossal air space in panoramic radiographs: A comparative study A 3D-printed craniofacial fracture library with QR-integrated pedagogical content: a technical note for maxillofacial trauma teaching Champions in the making? – The Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in 2026 Sialography and endoscopy-based classification of salivary duct stenosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1