Decay in Physiologic Knowledge since Medical School among Critical Care Fellows (DIP Study).

IF 1.7 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE ATS scholar Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0036OC
Stephanie I Maximous, Megan Acho, Jalil Ahari, Katrina Hawkins, Daniel B Jamieson, Andrew M Luks, Jason Poston, Nitin Seam, Nirav G Shah, Junfeng Sun, Christian J Woods, Burton W Lee
{"title":"Decay in Physiologic Knowledge since Medical School among Critical Care Fellows (DIP Study).","authors":"Stephanie I Maximous, Megan Acho, Jalil Ahari, Katrina Hawkins, Daniel B Jamieson, Andrew M Luks, Jason Poston, Nitin Seam, Nirav G Shah, Junfeng Sun, Christian J Woods, Burton W Lee","doi":"10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0036OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Rapid accumulation of knowledge and skills by trainees in the intensive care unit assumes prior mastery of clinically relevant core physiology concepts. However, for many fellows, their foundational physiology knowledge was acquired years earlier during their preclinical medical curricula and variably reinforced during the remainder of their undergraduate and graduate medical training. <b>Objective:</b> We sought to assess the retention of clinically relevant pulmonary physiology knowledge among pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) and critical care medicine (CCM) fellows. <b>Methods:</b> A composite examination was developed from an initial set of questions used in preclinical pulmonary physiology courses at four separate medical schools. These questions passed through multiple rounds of review by various educators to arrive at a set of 15 multiple-choice questions. The test was administered to incoming first-year PCCM and CCM fellows at seven institutions during their 2021 fellowship orientation. <b>Results:</b> Forty-one first-year PCCM (<i>n</i> = 24) and CCM (<i>n</i> = 17) fellows completed the examination, and the proportion correct among the fellows was compared with that of medical students for each item. Although all questions were deemed to be clinically relevant, preclinical medical students significantly outperformed the incoming fellows. <b>Conclusion:</b> These findings suggest considerable decay of clinically relevant pulmonary physiologic knowledge during residency training and point to a need for longitudinal retrieval practice to reinforce these concepts during the course of medical school clerkship years and postgraduate clinical training as well as consideration of dedicated pulmonary physiology curricula for PCCM and CCM fellowship programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72330,"journal":{"name":"ATS scholar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATS scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34197/ats-scholar.2024-0036OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rapid accumulation of knowledge and skills by trainees in the intensive care unit assumes prior mastery of clinically relevant core physiology concepts. However, for many fellows, their foundational physiology knowledge was acquired years earlier during their preclinical medical curricula and variably reinforced during the remainder of their undergraduate and graduate medical training. Objective: We sought to assess the retention of clinically relevant pulmonary physiology knowledge among pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM) and critical care medicine (CCM) fellows. Methods: A composite examination was developed from an initial set of questions used in preclinical pulmonary physiology courses at four separate medical schools. These questions passed through multiple rounds of review by various educators to arrive at a set of 15 multiple-choice questions. The test was administered to incoming first-year PCCM and CCM fellows at seven institutions during their 2021 fellowship orientation. Results: Forty-one first-year PCCM (n = 24) and CCM (n = 17) fellows completed the examination, and the proportion correct among the fellows was compared with that of medical students for each item. Although all questions were deemed to be clinically relevant, preclinical medical students significantly outperformed the incoming fellows. Conclusion: These findings suggest considerable decay of clinically relevant pulmonary physiologic knowledge during residency training and point to a need for longitudinal retrieval practice to reinforce these concepts during the course of medical school clerkship years and postgraduate clinical training as well as consideration of dedicated pulmonary physiology curricula for PCCM and CCM fellowship programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自医学院以来,重症监护研究员生理知识的衰退(DIP研究)。
背景:在重症监护室受训人员快速积累知识和技能的前提是事先掌握临床相关的核心生理学概念。然而,对于许多研究员来说,他们的基础生理学知识是在他们的临床前医学课程中获得的,并在他们的本科和研究生医学培训的剩余时间里不断加强。目的:我们试图评估肺与重症医学(PCCM)和重症医学(CCM)研究员对临床相关肺生理学知识的保留情况。方法:从四所独立医学院临床前肺生理学课程中最初使用的一套问题中开发出一种复合考试。这些问题经过了不同教育工作者的多轮审查,最终形成了一套15道选择题。该测试在7个机构的PCCM新生和CCM研究员2021年入学指导期间进行。结果:41名一年级PCCM学生(n = 24)和17名CCM学生(n = 17)完成了考试,并比较了他们与医学生在各项目上的正确率。虽然所有的问题都被认为与临床相关,但临床前医学院学生的表现明显优于新生。结论:这些研究结果表明,在住院医师培训期间,临床相关的肺生理学知识有相当大的衰减,并指出需要在医学院实习和研究生临床培训期间进行纵向检索实践,以加强这些概念,并考虑为PCCM和CCM奖学金项目开设专门的肺生理学课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Educational Outcomes of a New Obstetrics Rapid Response Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents. A Data-driven Approach to Selecting Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellows for Interviews. Decay in Physiologic Knowledge since Medical School among Critical Care Fellows (DIP Study). Mapping Pediatric Pulmonary Milestones 2.0 to Entrustable Professional Activities. The Impact of Applicant Sex on Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Fellowship Letters of Recommendation: A Multisite Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1