Relationship between apathy/post-stroke depression and gait training in patients with stroke.

Takashi Maeda, Kenichiro Shishido, Tomoki Ouchida, Yasuyuki Moriuchi, Atsuko Hayashi
{"title":"Relationship between apathy/post-stroke depression and gait training in patients with stroke.","authors":"Takashi Maeda, Kenichiro Shishido, Tomoki Ouchida, Yasuyuki Moriuchi, Atsuko Hayashi","doi":"10.1111/psyg.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We examined the effect of gait training on apathy/post-stroke depression (PSD) in patients with walking disorders after stroke, and the effect of apathy/PSD on gait reacquisition in subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-five participants with gait disorders after stroke underwent gait training for 6 weeks. Outcome measurements included Apathy Scale (AS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Mini-Mental State Examination, Lower Extremity Function of Stroke Impairment Assessment Set, and Functional Independence Measure-TRANSFER and -WALK scores. These scores of the participants were divided into groups with or without apathy based on AS scores for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant differences in all outcomes after gait training. In addition, even if the participants had apathy at baseline, there were no significant differences in outcomes other than AS/CES-D between the two groups after gait training. Logistic regression analysis showed that only Mini-Mental State Examination and Lower Extremity Function of Stroke Impairment Assessment Set scores affected the reacquisition of independent walking (odds ratio: 1.332, P = 0.015; odds ratio: 1.364, P = 0.005, respectively). AS and CES-D scores had no effects on gait reacquisition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gait training may be beneficial for both physical impairment and psychiatric symptoms in patients with stroke and may prevent poor functional recovery caused by apathy and PSD. As opposed to previous studies that have shown a negative impact of apathy and PSD on functional recovery, our results suggest that apathy/PSD may not negatively affect functional recovery when gait training is conducted in subacute stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":74597,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","volume":"25 2","pages":"e70002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.70002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We examined the effect of gait training on apathy/post-stroke depression (PSD) in patients with walking disorders after stroke, and the effect of apathy/PSD on gait reacquisition in subacute stroke.

Methods: Fifty-five participants with gait disorders after stroke underwent gait training for 6 weeks. Outcome measurements included Apathy Scale (AS), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), Mini-Mental State Examination, Lower Extremity Function of Stroke Impairment Assessment Set, and Functional Independence Measure-TRANSFER and -WALK scores. These scores of the participants were divided into groups with or without apathy based on AS scores for statistical analysis.

Results: Both groups showed significant differences in all outcomes after gait training. In addition, even if the participants had apathy at baseline, there were no significant differences in outcomes other than AS/CES-D between the two groups after gait training. Logistic regression analysis showed that only Mini-Mental State Examination and Lower Extremity Function of Stroke Impairment Assessment Set scores affected the reacquisition of independent walking (odds ratio: 1.332, P = 0.015; odds ratio: 1.364, P = 0.005, respectively). AS and CES-D scores had no effects on gait reacquisition.

Conclusion: Gait training may be beneficial for both physical impairment and psychiatric symptoms in patients with stroke and may prevent poor functional recovery caused by apathy and PSD. As opposed to previous studies that have shown a negative impact of apathy and PSD on functional recovery, our results suggest that apathy/PSD may not negatively affect functional recovery when gait training is conducted in subacute stroke.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑卒中患者冷漠/脑卒中后抑郁与步态训练的关系
背景:我们研究了步态训练对卒中后行走障碍患者冷漠/卒中后抑郁(PSD)的影响,以及亚急性卒中患者冷漠/PSD对步态重新习得的影响。方法:55名卒中后步态障碍患者接受为期6周的步态训练。结果测量包括冷漠量表(AS)、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)、简易精神状态检查、中风损伤下肢功能评估集、功能独立测量-转移和-WALK评分。根据受试者的AS得分分为冷漠组和不冷漠组进行统计分析。结果:两组在步态训练后的所有结果均有显著差异。此外,即使参与者在基线时冷漠,两组在步态训练后除了AS/CES-D之外的结果没有显著差异。Logistic回归分析显示,仅卒中损害评估集最小精神状态检查和下肢功能评分影响独立行走的再习得(优势比:1.332,P = 0.015;优势比:1.364,P = 0.005)。AS和CES-D评分对步态恢复无影响。结论:步态训练对脑卒中患者的身体损伤和精神症状均有改善作用,并可预防因冷漠和PSD引起的功能恢复不良。与以往研究显示冷漠和PSD对功能恢复的负面影响相反,我们的研究结果表明,在亚急性卒中中进行步态训练时,冷漠/PSD可能不会对功能恢复产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between apathy/post-stroke depression and gait training in patients with stroke. Expressed emotion mediates the association between caregiver relationship closeness and psychological symptoms in people with dementia. Factors associated with grief in family carers of people with dementia in Japan: a systematic review. Repercussions of abuse by caregivers in the elderly population with dementia: a scoping review. Psychosocial problems observed in older adults after disaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1