Jonathan P. Stange , Ellie P. Xu , Sarah L. Zapetis , Jiani Li , Lisanne Jenkins , Jagan Jimmy , Zihua Ye , Pia Sellery , Coralie S. Phanord , Erika Forbes , Timothy J. Trull , Robin J. Mermelstein , Olusola Ajilore
{"title":"Neurophysiological Markers of Regulation Success in Everyday Life in Depression","authors":"Jonathan P. Stange , Ellie P. Xu , Sarah L. Zapetis , Jiani Li , Lisanne Jenkins , Jagan Jimmy , Zihua Ye , Pia Sellery , Coralie S. Phanord , Erika Forbes , Timothy J. Trull , Robin J. Mermelstein , Olusola Ajilore","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Self-regulation is often disrupted in depression and is characterized by negative affect and inflexible parasympathetic responses. However, our understanding of brain mechanisms of self-regulatory processes has largely been limited to laboratory contexts. Measuring individual differences in self-regulatory processes in everyday life—and their neural correlates—could inform our understanding of depression phenotypes and reveal novel intervention targets that impact everyday functioning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>In individuals with remitted major depressive disorder and healthy comparison participants (</span><em>N</em><span> = 74), we measured 2 dimensions of regulation success in everyday life—perceived success with regulating affect and physiological success (parasympathetic augmentation following regulation attempts)—and their neural correlates using a functional magnetic resonance imaging emotion regulation task.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Perceptions of success were weakly associated with physiological success and had partially distinct neural correlates. Perceived success and physiological success in everyday life predicted reduced activity in brain regions involved in emotional salience while reacting to aversive stimuli in the scanner. During reappraisal in the scanner, greater perceived success in everyday life was dimensionally associated with more reappraisal-related activity in regions involved in cognitive control (including the dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices); in contrast, physiological success predicted enhanced downregulation of </span>salience network activity (amygdala, insula).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Results suggest that linking psychophysiology<span> with behavior in everyday life can provide a window into dissociable dimensions of self-regulatory functioning. Integrating ambulatory and brain-based metrics may elucidate self-regulatory phenotypes with distinct neurophysiological mechanisms and targets for intervention to impact functioning in daily life.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54231,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 58-69"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychiatry-Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451902225000266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Self-regulation is often disrupted in depression and is characterized by negative affect and inflexible parasympathetic responses. However, our understanding of brain mechanisms of self-regulatory processes has largely been limited to laboratory contexts. Measuring individual differences in self-regulatory processes in everyday life—and their neural correlates—could inform our understanding of depression phenotypes and reveal novel intervention targets that impact everyday functioning.
Methods
In individuals with remitted major depressive disorder and healthy comparison participants (N = 74), we measured 2 dimensions of regulation success in everyday life—perceived success with regulating affect and physiological success (parasympathetic augmentation following regulation attempts)—and their neural correlates using a functional magnetic resonance imaging emotion regulation task.
Results
Perceptions of success were weakly associated with physiological success and had partially distinct neural correlates. Perceived success and physiological success in everyday life predicted reduced activity in brain regions involved in emotional salience while reacting to aversive stimuli in the scanner. During reappraisal in the scanner, greater perceived success in everyday life was dimensionally associated with more reappraisal-related activity in regions involved in cognitive control (including the dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortices); in contrast, physiological success predicted enhanced downregulation of salience network activity (amygdala, insula).
Conclusions
Results suggest that linking psychophysiology with behavior in everyday life can provide a window into dissociable dimensions of self-regulatory functioning. Integrating ambulatory and brain-based metrics may elucidate self-regulatory phenotypes with distinct neurophysiological mechanisms and targets for intervention to impact functioning in daily life.
期刊介绍:
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging is an official journal of the Society for Biological Psychiatry, whose purpose is to promote excellence in scientific research and education in fields that investigate the nature, causes, mechanisms, and treatments of disorders of thought, emotion, or behavior. In accord with this mission, this peer-reviewed, rapid-publication, international journal focuses on studies using the tools and constructs of cognitive neuroscience, including the full range of non-invasive neuroimaging and human extra- and intracranial physiological recording methodologies. It publishes both basic and clinical studies, including those that incorporate genetic data, pharmacological challenges, and computational modeling approaches. The journal publishes novel results of original research which represent an important new lead or significant impact on the field. Reviews and commentaries that focus on topics of current research and interest are also encouraged.