Optimal treatment strategy for central nervous system non-germinomatous germ cell tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Critical reviews in oncology/hematology Pub Date : 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104615
Zhirui Zhou , Xiwei Zhang , Lin Zheng , Qi Yue , Xin Lin , Yang Wang , Ying Mao
{"title":"Optimal treatment strategy for central nervous system non-germinomatous germ cell tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Zhirui Zhou ,&nbsp;Xiwei Zhang ,&nbsp;Lin Zheng ,&nbsp;Qi Yue ,&nbsp;Xin Lin ,&nbsp;Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Ying Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>To determine the optimal treatment modality for central nervous system (CNS) non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted up to September 30, 2024. All studies were considered, covering all CNS NGGCT patients with an informative treatment approach. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Total 42 studies were included in the systematic review. Pooled risk ratio (RR) indicated a 28 % lower failure rate for the gross total resection (GTR) compared to the non-GTR group [RR = 0.72, 95 % CI (0.55, 0.95), <em>P</em> = 0.02]. Meta-analysis showed that craniospinal irradiation (CSI) was associated with a significantly lower failure rate for localized NGGCTs [RR = 0.53, 95 % CI (0.38, 0.74), <em>P</em> = 0.0002]. Meta-analysis manifested that the risk of any failure event was 27 % lower in the chemoradiotherapy group compared to radiotherapy alone [RR = 0.73, 95 % CI (0.55, 0.98), <em>P</em> = 0.04]. Total 21 studies reported treatment-related acute and/or late toxicity, combination chemotherapy increased acute toxic, and expanded RT field and/or dose mainly increased late toxicity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>GTR was associated with better outcomes in terms of any failure event, and CSI was particularly beneficial for localized NGGCTs patients in reducing any failure event rate, and combination chemotherapy further reduced the failure risk. If CSI is combined with chemotherapy, the total RT dose can be appropriately reduced.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"207 ","pages":"Article 104615"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825000034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To determine the optimal treatment modality for central nervous system (CNS) non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs).

Materials and Methods

A search of Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted up to September 30, 2024. All studies were considered, covering all CNS NGGCT patients with an informative treatment approach. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

Results

Total 42 studies were included in the systematic review. Pooled risk ratio (RR) indicated a 28 % lower failure rate for the gross total resection (GTR) compared to the non-GTR group [RR = 0.72, 95 % CI (0.55, 0.95), P = 0.02]. Meta-analysis showed that craniospinal irradiation (CSI) was associated with a significantly lower failure rate for localized NGGCTs [RR = 0.53, 95 % CI (0.38, 0.74), P = 0.0002]. Meta-analysis manifested that the risk of any failure event was 27 % lower in the chemoradiotherapy group compared to radiotherapy alone [RR = 0.73, 95 % CI (0.55, 0.98), P = 0.04]. Total 21 studies reported treatment-related acute and/or late toxicity, combination chemotherapy increased acute toxic, and expanded RT field and/or dose mainly increased late toxicity.

Conclusion

GTR was associated with better outcomes in terms of any failure event, and CSI was particularly beneficial for localized NGGCTs patients in reducing any failure event rate, and combination chemotherapy further reduced the failure risk. If CSI is combined with chemotherapy, the total RT dose can be appropriately reduced.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中枢神经系统非生发性生殖细胞肿瘤的最佳治疗策略:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:确定中枢神经系统(CNS)非生发性生殖细胞肿瘤(NGGCTs)的最佳治疗方式。材料与方法:检索Medline、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索截止到2024年9月30日。我们考虑了所有的研究,涵盖了所有中枢神经系统NGGCT患者,并采用了信息丰富的治疗方法。计算合并风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果:系统评价共纳入42项研究。综合风险比(RR)显示,与非GTR组相比,GTR的失败率低28% [RR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.55, 0.95), P = 0.02]。meta分析显示,颅脊髓照射(CSI)与局限性nggct的失败率显著降低相关[RR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.38, 0.74), P = 0.0002]。荟萃分析显示,放化疗组任何失败事件的风险比单纯放疗低27% [RR = 0.73, 95% CI (0.55, 0.98), P = 0.04]。共有21项研究报告了与治疗相关的急性和/或晚期毒性,联合化疗增加了急性毒性,扩大放疗范围和/或剂量主要增加了晚期毒性。结论:GTR在任何失败事件方面均与较好的预后相关,CSI对局限性nggct患者尤其有利于降低任何失败事件发生率,联合化疗进一步降低了失败风险。若CSI联合化疗,可适当减少总放疗剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
期刊最新文献
Nanobots: The current scenario HER2-targeted therapies: Unraveling their role in biliary tract cancers Metabolic cross-talk between glioblastoma and glioblastoma-associated microglia/macrophages: From basic insights to therapeutic strategies Circulating microRNAs: A remarkable opportunity as non-invasive biomarkers from adult to pediatric brain tumor patients Recent insights and applications of nanocarriers-based drug delivery systems for colonic drug delivery and cancer therapy: An updated review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1