The association between screen time trajectories and the comorbidity of depression and anxiety.

Jie Zhang, Xinyi Feng, Qin Zhang, Di Wu, Wenhe Wang, Shudan Liu, Qin Liu
{"title":"The association between screen time trajectories and the comorbidity of depression and anxiety.","authors":"Jie Zhang, Xinyi Feng, Qin Zhang, Di Wu, Wenhe Wang, Shudan Liu, Qin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression and anxiety are often comorbid among adolescents. Adolescent screen time changes over time. This study investigates the association between screen time trajectories and the comorbidity of depression and anxiety from a longitudinal perspective. The data were collected from an ongoing prospective puberty cohort which was established in 2014 from Chongqing, China. 838 participants (52.03 % female; wave 1 mean age = 8.62, SD = 1.15) were followed up from 2014 to 2020. Questions about screen time were administered every six months. Trajectories of screen time were identified using latent class growth analysis. Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) were used to measure depression and anxiety. Latent profile analysis was used to identify the subtypes of comorbidity of depression and anxiety. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between screen time trajectory and the comorbidity of depression and anxiety. Three distinct trajectories of screen time were identified: Group Low (68.26 %) had consistently low screen time, Group High (26.37 %) had high screen time and Group Increasing (5.37 %) was characterized by an increasing screen time. Four subtypes of the comorbidity of depression and anxiety were fitted (\"High comorbidity\", \"Low comorbidity\", \"Low depression symptoms\" and \"No symptoms\"). Group Increasing and Group High were associated with \"Low comorbidity\" and \"Low depression symptoms\". Group Increasing was more likely to be the \"high comorbidity\" both boys and girls. However, Group High was associated with \"high comorbidity\" only in girls. The results of this study may inform future research and provide possible intervention targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":93857,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"163 ","pages":"108260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression and anxiety are often comorbid among adolescents. Adolescent screen time changes over time. This study investigates the association between screen time trajectories and the comorbidity of depression and anxiety from a longitudinal perspective. The data were collected from an ongoing prospective puberty cohort which was established in 2014 from Chongqing, China. 838 participants (52.03 % female; wave 1 mean age = 8.62, SD = 1.15) were followed up from 2014 to 2020. Questions about screen time were administered every six months. Trajectories of screen time were identified using latent class growth analysis. Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) and Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) were used to measure depression and anxiety. Latent profile analysis was used to identify the subtypes of comorbidity of depression and anxiety. Logistic regression was used to explore the association between screen time trajectory and the comorbidity of depression and anxiety. Three distinct trajectories of screen time were identified: Group Low (68.26 %) had consistently low screen time, Group High (26.37 %) had high screen time and Group Increasing (5.37 %) was characterized by an increasing screen time. Four subtypes of the comorbidity of depression and anxiety were fitted ("High comorbidity", "Low comorbidity", "Low depression symptoms" and "No symptoms"). Group Increasing and Group High were associated with "Low comorbidity" and "Low depression symptoms". Group Increasing was more likely to be the "high comorbidity" both boys and girls. However, Group High was associated with "high comorbidity" only in girls. The results of this study may inform future research and provide possible intervention targets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
屏幕时间轨迹与抑郁和焦虑共病之间的关系。
抑郁和焦虑常常在青少年中并存。青少年的屏幕时间随着时间的推移而变化。本研究从纵向角度探讨屏幕时间轨迹与抑郁、焦虑共病之间的关系。数据来自2014年在中国重庆建立的一项正在进行的前瞻性青春期队列研究,共有838名参与者(52.03%为女性;第一波平均年龄为8.62岁,SD = 1.15),随访时间为2014 - 2020年。有关屏幕时间的问题每六个月进行一次。使用潜在类别增长分析确定屏幕时间的轨迹。使用儿童抑郁量表(CDI)和儿童焦虑相关障碍筛查量表(SCARED)来测量抑郁和焦虑。潜在特征分析用于确定抑郁和焦虑共病的亚型。采用Logistic回归探讨屏幕时间轨迹与抑郁、焦虑共病的关系。三种不同的屏幕时间轨迹:低组(68.26%)持续低屏幕时间,高组(26.37%)持续高屏幕时间,增加组(5.37%)以屏幕时间增加为特征。抑郁和焦虑共病的四种亚型被拟合(“高共病”、“低共病”、“低抑郁症状”和“无症状”)。增加组和高组与“低合并症”和“低抑郁症状”相关。增加组更可能是男孩和女孩的“高合并症”。然而,高组仅在女孩中与“高合并症”相关。本研究结果可为未来的研究提供参考,并提供可能的干预目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Browsing problematic social media use in autism spectrum disorder: The role of social anxiety. Does cannabis substitute or complement alcohol after recreational cannabis legalization in the Washington State? A three-level mixed-effects modeling. Dose-dependent effects of alcohol consumption on pressure pain threshold. Event-level effects of alcohol, cannabis, and simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use on bystander intentions in response to hypothetical situations among college women. Effects of narrative versus non-narrative pictorial warning labels on visual attention and alcohol-related cancer risk perceptions: An eye-tracking study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1