Factors associated with grade progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Stephanie J Wang, Wesley Kidder, Nancy M Joseph, Bryan Khuong Le, Sheila Lindsay, Farhana Moon, Eric Nakakura, Li Zhang, Emily K Bergsland
{"title":"Factors associated with grade progression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.","authors":"Stephanie J Wang, Wesley Kidder, Nancy M Joseph, Bryan Khuong Le, Sheila Lindsay, Farhana Moon, Eric Nakakura, Li Zhang, Emily K Bergsland","doi":"10.1530/ERC-24-0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Grade progression of well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) can occur over time, with G1/2 to G3 the most clinically relevant form. Here we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 66 patients with initially G1/2 panNET (median initial Ki67, 4.6%). Patients were followed for a median 6.8 years and had a median of 2 metachronous tumor biopsies over their disease course. 34.8% of patients underwent any form of grade progression, including G1>G2/3 and G2>G3, while 24.2% demonstrated G1/2 to G3 grade progression. Over a median 2.3 years, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors experienced a median Ki67 change of +27.0% (range, +6.4 to +48.7%). Subsequent biopsies showing progression to G3 had a median Ki67 value of 31.0% (range, 21.0-60.0%), and were more often performed following suspicious clinical behavior (75.0%) rather than routinely at the time of scheduled procedure/surgery (25.0%). Similar to prior studies, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors had worse overall survival from time of metastatic disease (median, 4.8 years vs not reached for stably G1/2 disease; P = 0.002). Heavier pretreatment and heterogeneity or lack of uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging were independently associated with progression to G3. In the largest study of metachronous panNET biopsies to date, our findings show that baseline biopsies suggesting G1/2 disease may not accurately reflect future disease status, highlighting the possible limitations of using archived tissue to stratify patients into trials and/or choose future therapy. Additional work is needed to better understand the impact of prior therapies on grade progression and how to identify which lesions to best follow for repeat biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93989,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine-related cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine-related cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-24-0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grade progression of well differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (panNETs) can occur over time, with G1/2 to G3 the most clinically relevant form. Here we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 66 patients with initially G1/2 panNET (median initial Ki67, 4.6%). Patients were followed for a median 6.8 years and had a median of 2 metachronous tumor biopsies over their disease course. 34.8% of patients underwent any form of grade progression, including G1>G2/3 and G2>G3, while 24.2% demonstrated G1/2 to G3 grade progression. Over a median 2.3 years, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors experienced a median Ki67 change of +27.0% (range, +6.4 to +48.7%). Subsequent biopsies showing progression to G3 had a median Ki67 value of 31.0% (range, 21.0-60.0%), and were more often performed following suspicious clinical behavior (75.0%) rather than routinely at the time of scheduled procedure/surgery (25.0%). Similar to prior studies, G1/2 to G3 grade progressors had worse overall survival from time of metastatic disease (median, 4.8 years vs not reached for stably G1/2 disease; P = 0.002). Heavier pretreatment and heterogeneity or lack of uptake on somatostatin receptor imaging were independently associated with progression to G3. In the largest study of metachronous panNET biopsies to date, our findings show that baseline biopsies suggesting G1/2 disease may not accurately reflect future disease status, highlighting the possible limitations of using archived tissue to stratify patients into trials and/or choose future therapy. Additional work is needed to better understand the impact of prior therapies on grade progression and how to identify which lesions to best follow for repeat biopsy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤分级进展的相关因素。
随着时间的推移,分化良好的胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(panNETs)可发生分级进展,其中G1/2至G3最具临床相关性。在这里,我们对66例初始G1/2 panNET患者(初始Ki67中位数,4.6%)进行了回顾性队列研究。患者随访时间中位数为6.8年,在整个病程中中位数有2次异时性肿瘤活检。34.8%的患者经历了任何形式的分级进展,包括G1>G2/3和G2>G3,而24.2%的患者表现为G1/2至G3级进展。在平均2.3年的时间里,G1/2至G3级进展者的Ki67中位数变化为+27.0%(范围为+6.4至+48.7%)。随后的活检显示进展为G3, Ki67的中位值为31.0%(范围21.0-60.0%),并且更常在可疑的临床行为(75.0%)后进行,而不是在计划的手术/手术时进行常规检查(25.0%)。与先前的研究类似,G1/2至G3级进展者从转移性疾病开始的总生存期较差(中位数为4.8年,而稳定的G1/2疾病未达到;P = 0.002)。较重的预处理和生长抑素受体成像的异质性或缺乏摄取与进展为G3独立相关。在迄今为止最大的异时panNET活检研究中,我们的研究结果表明,提示G1/2疾病的基线活检可能不能准确反映未来的疾病状态,这突出了使用档案组织将患者分层进行试验和/或选择未来治疗的可能局限性。需要进一步的工作来更好地了解先前治疗对分级进展的影响,以及如何确定哪些病变最好进行重复活检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RET signalling in the pituitary: a double-edged sword for differentiation, apoptosis and therapeutic strategies in acromegaly. Persistent pre-exhausted CD8+ T cells shape the tumor immune microenvironment in anaplastic thyroid cancer. Ampullary composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor management. Needle tract seeding of thyroid cancer after biopsy of distant metastasis: a retrospective cohort. Systems-level liquid biopsy in advanced prostate cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1