Particulate matter, socioeconomic status, and cognitive function among older adults in China.

Qi Zhao
{"title":"Particulate matter, socioeconomic status, and cognitive function among older adults in China.","authors":"Qi Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2025.105756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both air pollution and low socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with worse cognitive function. The extent to which low SES may compound the adverse effect of air pollution on cognitive function remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>7,087 older adults aged 65 and above were included from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) and followed up in 4 waves during 2008-2018. Cognitive function was measured repeatedly at each wave using the modified Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Concentrations of particulate matter (PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub>) were evaluated using satellite-based spatiotemporal models. SES was measured based on five components and categorized into three levels (low, middle, and high). Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the association of PM and SES with cognitive function. Stratified analyses and effect modification by SES levels were further conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each 10 µg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub> was associated with a 0.43 (95 % CI: -0.58, -0.27), 0.29 (95% CI: -0.37, -0.20), and 0.17 (95 % CI: -0.22, -0.13) unit decrease in MMSE scores, respectively. Lower SES was associated with worse cognitive function. Significant effect modifications were observed by SES, with the corresponding association of PM exposure being more pronounced among participants with a lower SES (p-interaction = 0.006, 0.001, and 0.006 for PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub>, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SES is an important effect modifier, and lower SES may compound the detrimental effect of PM on cognitive health. This finding may have implications for identifying vulnerable populations and targeted interventions against air pollution.</p>","PeriodicalId":93880,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"131 ","pages":"105756"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2025.105756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both air pollution and low socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with worse cognitive function. The extent to which low SES may compound the adverse effect of air pollution on cognitive function remains unclear.

Methods: 7,087 older adults aged 65 and above were included from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) and followed up in 4 waves during 2008-2018. Cognitive function was measured repeatedly at each wave using the modified Chinese Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Concentrations of particulate matter (PM1, PM2.5, and PM10) were evaluated using satellite-based spatiotemporal models. SES was measured based on five components and categorized into three levels (low, middle, and high). Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the association of PM and SES with cognitive function. Stratified analyses and effect modification by SES levels were further conducted.

Results: Each 10 µg/m3 increase in PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 was associated with a 0.43 (95 % CI: -0.58, -0.27), 0.29 (95% CI: -0.37, -0.20), and 0.17 (95 % CI: -0.22, -0.13) unit decrease in MMSE scores, respectively. Lower SES was associated with worse cognitive function. Significant effect modifications were observed by SES, with the corresponding association of PM exposure being more pronounced among participants with a lower SES (p-interaction = 0.006, 0.001, and 0.006 for PM1, PM2.5, and PM10, respectively).

Conclusions: SES is an important effect modifier, and lower SES may compound the detrimental effect of PM on cognitive health. This finding may have implications for identifying vulnerable populations and targeted interventions against air pollution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国老年人的颗粒物、社会经济地位和认知功能
背景:空气污染和低社会经济地位(SES)都与认知功能恶化有关。低SES会在多大程度上加重空气污染对认知功能的不利影响尚不清楚。方法:从中国健康长寿纵向调查(CLHLS)中纳入7087名65岁及以上老年人,并于2008-2018年分4波随访。使用改进的中国简易精神状态检查(MMSE)重复测量每波的认知功能。使用基于卫星的时空模型对颗粒物(PM1、PM2.5和PM10)浓度进行了评估。SES以5个组成部分为基础,分为低、中、高3个等级。采用广义估计方程模型估计PM和SES与认知功能的关系。进一步进行了SES水平的分层分析和效应修正。结果:PM1、PM2.5和PM10每增加10µg/m3, MMSE评分分别下降0.43 (95% CI: -0.58, -0.27)、0.29 (95% CI: -0.37, -0.20)和0.17 (95% CI: -0.22, -0.13)个单位。社会经济地位越低,认知功能越差。社会经济地位对PM1、PM2.5和PM10的影响显著,社会经济地位越低,PM1、PM2.5和PM10的p交互作用分别为0.006、0.001和0.006。结论:社会经济地位是一个重要的效应调节因子,低社会经济地位可能加重PM对认知健康的不利影响。这一发现可能会对识别弱势群体和针对空气污染的有针对性的干预措施产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The polygenic hazard score mediates the association between plasma neurofilament light chain and brain morphometry in dementia spectrum. Global burden of non-rheumatic valvular heart disease in older adults (60-89 years old), 1990-2019: Systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Taking an age-period-cohort perspective to assess changes in the incidence of self-perceptions of aging over time. Do obstructive and restrictive pulmonary disorders increase the incidence risk of dynapenia in adults aged 50 and older? The prognostic value of estimated glomerular filtration rate change in elderly patients undergoing valvular replacement surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1