Impact of papillary muscle infarction on atrial and ventricular myocardial deformation in non-anterior STEMI patients.

Riccardo Cau, Alessandro Pinna, Roberta Montisci, Luigia d'Errico, Jasjit S Suri, Marco Francone, Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Luca Saba
{"title":"Impact of papillary muscle infarction on atrial and ventricular myocardial deformation in non-anterior STEMI patients.","authors":"Riccardo Cau, Alessandro Pinna, Roberta Montisci, Luigia d'Errico, Jasjit S Suri, Marco Francone, Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Luca Saba","doi":"10.1007/s10554-024-03317-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of papillary muscle (PPM) infarction on left atrial and ventricular strain parameters in patients with non-anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NA-STEMI) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). This retrospective study performed CMR scans on 88 consecutive patients with NA-STEMI (68 males, 65 ± 10.05 years). Among them, 30 demonstrated PPM infarction (25 males, 67.12 ± 9.49 years), defined as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in a papillary muscle head in two contiguous LGE CMR slices, and confirmed on the long-axis LGE CMR slices. Atrial and ventricular strain were analyzed by CMR feature tracking with dedicated post-processing software. Patients with PPM infarction were older (p = 0.001), with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.040), higher indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (p = 0.020), and end-systolic volume (p = 0.044) compared to patients without LGE in the papillary muscle. Additionally, patients with PPM infarction showed impaired reservoir strain, booster strain, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and higher LGE extent compared to NA-STEMI patients without PPM involvement (p = 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively). In multivariable analysis, GLS, global radial strain, reservoir strain, and booster strain parameters were the only independent determinants of PPM infarction (p = 0.001, p = 0.041, p = 0.002, and p = 0.027, respectively). The presence of PPM infarction assessed by CMR is independently linked to atrial and ventricular strain impairment in patients with NA-STEMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-024-03317-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of papillary muscle (PPM) infarction on left atrial and ventricular strain parameters in patients with non-anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NA-STEMI) using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). This retrospective study performed CMR scans on 88 consecutive patients with NA-STEMI (68 males, 65 ± 10.05 years). Among them, 30 demonstrated PPM infarction (25 males, 67.12 ± 9.49 years), defined as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in a papillary muscle head in two contiguous LGE CMR slices, and confirmed on the long-axis LGE CMR slices. Atrial and ventricular strain were analyzed by CMR feature tracking with dedicated post-processing software. Patients with PPM infarction were older (p = 0.001), with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.040), higher indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (p = 0.020), and end-systolic volume (p = 0.044) compared to patients without LGE in the papillary muscle. Additionally, patients with PPM infarction showed impaired reservoir strain, booster strain, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and higher LGE extent compared to NA-STEMI patients without PPM involvement (p = 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively). In multivariable analysis, GLS, global radial strain, reservoir strain, and booster strain parameters were the only independent determinants of PPM infarction (p = 0.001, p = 0.041, p = 0.002, and p = 0.027, respectively). The presence of PPM infarction assessed by CMR is independently linked to atrial and ventricular strain impairment in patients with NA-STEMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非前路STEMI患者乳头状肌梗死对心房和心室心肌变形的影响。
本研究的目的是利用心血管磁共振(CMR)技术探讨非前路st段抬高型心肌梗死(NA-STEMI)患者乳头状肌(PPM)梗死对左心房和心室应变参数的影响。本回顾性研究对88例连续NA-STEMI患者(男性68例,65±10.05岁)进行CMR扫描。其中PPM梗死30例(男性25例,67.12±9.49岁),连续2张LGE CMR片定义为乳头肌头晚期钆增强(LGE),长轴LGE CMR片证实。采用CMR特征跟踪和专用后处理软件分析心房和心室应变。与乳头肌无LGE的患者相比,PPM梗死患者年龄较大(p = 0.001),左心室射血分数较低(p = 0.040),左心室舒张末期容积指数较高(p = 0.020),收缩末期容积指数较高(p = 0.044)。此外,与没有PPM受累的NA-STEMI患者相比,PPM梗死患者表现出储层应变、增强应变、全局纵向应变(GLS)受损,LGE程度更高(p = 0.001, p = 0.004, p = 0.001和p = 0.003)。在多变量分析中,GLS、整体径向应变、储层应变和增强应变参数是PPM梗死的唯一独立决定因素(p = 0.001、p = 0.041、p = 0.002和p = 0.027)。CMR评估的PPM梗死的存在与NA-STEMI患者的心房和心室应变损伤独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characterization of epicardial adipose tissue thickness and structure by ultrasound radiomics in acute and chronic coronary patients. Redundant and aneurysmal interatrial septum motion: a commentary on anatomical factors and clinical implications. Comparison of global and regional myocardial blood flow quantification using dynamic solid-state detector SPECT and Tc-99 m-sestamibi or Tc-99 m-tetrofosmin in a routine clinical setting. Myocardial extracellular volume fraction estimations using late enhancement CT in patients with atrial fibrillation: a comparative study with cardiac MR. When a common sore throat unmasks a rare disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1