Nasal septum deviation after rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition.

Rodrigo Teixeira, Daniela Garib, João Gabriel Rando Poiani, Camila Massaro, Guilherme Adam Fraga, Sergio Henrique Kiemle Trindade, Luiz Fernando Manzoni Lourençone, Djessyca Miranda E Paulo, Carlos Flores-Mir
{"title":"Nasal septum deviation after rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition.","authors":"Rodrigo Teixeira, Daniela Garib, João Gabriel Rando Poiani, Camila Massaro, Guilherme Adam Fraga, Sergio Henrique Kiemle Trindade, Luiz Fernando Manzoni Lourençone, Djessyca Miranda E Paulo, Carlos Flores-Mir","doi":"10.2319/050124-344.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate nasal septum changes after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) during the mixed dentition and to verify the association between quantitative and qualitative assessments of nasal septum deviation (NSD) by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialists.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The sample comprised 24 patients (11 male, 13 female) with a mean age of 7.62 ± 0.92 years with maxillary transverse deficiencies. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained before and after RME. Three CBCT coronal sections passing through the maxillary first molars, 5 mm anterior and 5 mm posterior, were used for quantitative assessment. NSD was calculated using the ratio of nasal cavity height to nasal septum contour. Additionally, five ENT professionals evaluated NSD qualitatively using scores from 1 to 3 through CBCT sequential axial and coronal sections. Absent NSD was scored as zero. Interstage changes were assessed using Wilcoxon tests. Spearman correlation and linear regression were performed to evaluate the association between quantitative and qualitative analyses (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant change was observed in the NSD ratio. In pre-expansion CBCT images, absence of NSD and scores 1, 2, and 3 for NSD were found for 45.8%, 41.7%, 12.5%, and 0%, respectively. In the qualitative assessment, no significant change in NSD was observed after expansion. A strong association was found between NSD ratio and ENT score (r = 0.750).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the mixed dentition, no significant change was observed in the NSD ratio. Qualitative analysis of NSD was associated with quantitative assessment of the ratio between nasal septum contour and nasal cavity height.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/050124-344.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate nasal septum changes after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) during the mixed dentition and to verify the association between quantitative and qualitative assessments of nasal septum deviation (NSD) by ear, nose, and throat (ENT) specialists.

Materials and methods: The sample comprised 24 patients (11 male, 13 female) with a mean age of 7.62 ± 0.92 years with maxillary transverse deficiencies. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained before and after RME. Three CBCT coronal sections passing through the maxillary first molars, 5 mm anterior and 5 mm posterior, were used for quantitative assessment. NSD was calculated using the ratio of nasal cavity height to nasal septum contour. Additionally, five ENT professionals evaluated NSD qualitatively using scores from 1 to 3 through CBCT sequential axial and coronal sections. Absent NSD was scored as zero. Interstage changes were assessed using Wilcoxon tests. Spearman correlation and linear regression were performed to evaluate the association between quantitative and qualitative analyses (P < .05).

Results: No significant change was observed in the NSD ratio. In pre-expansion CBCT images, absence of NSD and scores 1, 2, and 3 for NSD were found for 45.8%, 41.7%, 12.5%, and 0%, respectively. In the qualitative assessment, no significant change in NSD was observed after expansion. A strong association was found between NSD ratio and ENT score (r = 0.750).

Conclusions: In the mixed dentition, no significant change was observed in the NSD ratio. Qualitative analysis of NSD was associated with quantitative assessment of the ratio between nasal septum contour and nasal cavity height.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期混合牙列快速上颌扩张后鼻中隔偏曲。
目的:评估混合牙列快速上颌扩张(RME)后鼻中隔的变化,并验证耳鼻喉科(ENT)专家对鼻中隔偏差(NSD)的定量和定性评估之间的关联。材料与方法:本组患者24例,男11例,女13例,平均年龄7.62±0.92岁。锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)在RME前后的图像。3个CBCT冠状切面穿过上颌第一磨牙,分别为5 mm前和5 mm后,用于定量评估。使用鼻腔高度与鼻中隔轮廓的比值计算NSD。此外,5名耳鼻喉科专业人员通过CBCT连续轴位和冠状面切片,用1到3分的评分对NSD进行定性评估。无NSD评分为0。采用Wilcoxon试验评估期间变化。采用Spearman相关和线性回归评价定量分析与定性分析的相关性(P < 0.05)。结果:两组NSD比值无明显变化。在扩张前的CBCT图像中,无NSD和NSD 1、2、3分的比例分别为45.8%、41.7%、12.5%和0%。在定性评价中,膨化后NSD未见明显变化。NSD比值与ENT评分有较强的相关性(r = 0.750)。结论:混合牙列中NSD比值无明显变化。NSD的定性分析与鼻中隔轮廓与鼻腔高度之比的定量评估相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nasal septum deviation after rapid maxillary expansion in the early mixed dentition. Effect of orthodontic treatment on traumatized teeth treated by regenerative endodontic procedure. Orthodontic treatment for preserving periodontally hopeless teeth in a middle-aged patient: a case report. Treatment effects of modified miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expander and rapid palatal expander for molar distalization. Anterior retraction with a canine implant in the way using clear aligner: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1