Responses of soil detachment capacity to different rock dip angles in karst trough valley

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Geoderma Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117174
Lisha Jiang, Fengling Gan, Xiaohong Tan, Hailong Shi, Youjin Yan, Qiuhao Liao, Junbing Pu
{"title":"Responses of soil detachment capacity to different rock dip angles in karst trough valley","authors":"Lisha Jiang, Fengling Gan, Xiaohong Tan, Hailong Shi, Youjin Yan, Qiuhao Liao, Junbing Pu","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The karst region is distinguished by pronounced and complex soil erosion, while the bedrock strata dip and root traits significantly influence the erosion slope, thereby altering the hydrodynamic characteristics and impacting Dc. Thus, it is imperative to comprehensively understand the influence mechanism of these factors on Dc in karst trough valley. The samples were collected from two types of natural grassland, <ce:italic>Erigeron canadensis</ce:italic> (EC; fibrous root system) and <ce:italic>Neyraudia reynaudiana</ce:italic> (NR; tap root system), as well as bare land (BL) without roots serving as the control. Subsequently, the samples underwent flow scouring in an indoor hydraulic flume at three rock dip angles (15°, 45°, and 65°) and three flow rates (60, 80, and 100 L·min<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup>) on dip/anti-dip slope. The results indicated that i) the soil organic matter (SOM), water-stable aggregates (WSA), root length density (RLD), root surface area density (RSAD), and root volume density (RVD) on the anti-dip slope were higher compared to those on the dip slope. Additionally, the EC demonstrated the highest abundance in karst trough valley. ii) The Dc of different rock dip angles both dip and anti-dip slopes followed the order of 45° &gt; 65° &gt; 15°. The Dc of two grassland and bare land can be ranked as follows: EC &lt; NR &lt; BL. iii) The Dc of the dip/anti-dip slope showed a significant negative correlation with WSA, root diameter (RD), RLD, RSAD, and RVD (<ce:italic>P</ce:italic> &lt; 0.05). iv) The results of the multivariate analysis of variance showed that the root traits had the highest contribution rate to Dc, followed by rock dip angles, and bedrock strata dip was the lowest. The resistance of EC to Dc is better under different rock dip angles of the dip/anti-dip slope. Therefore, expanding the coverage of EC across both dip and anti-dip slopes will contribute to mitigating soil erosion and facilitating ecosystem restoration. The research findings enhance the comprehension of soil erosion mechanisms in karst trough valley and facilitate the formulation of effective ecological restoration strategies.","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117174","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The karst region is distinguished by pronounced and complex soil erosion, while the bedrock strata dip and root traits significantly influence the erosion slope, thereby altering the hydrodynamic characteristics and impacting Dc. Thus, it is imperative to comprehensively understand the influence mechanism of these factors on Dc in karst trough valley. The samples were collected from two types of natural grassland, Erigeron canadensis (EC; fibrous root system) and Neyraudia reynaudiana (NR; tap root system), as well as bare land (BL) without roots serving as the control. Subsequently, the samples underwent flow scouring in an indoor hydraulic flume at three rock dip angles (15°, 45°, and 65°) and three flow rates (60, 80, and 100 L·min−1) on dip/anti-dip slope. The results indicated that i) the soil organic matter (SOM), water-stable aggregates (WSA), root length density (RLD), root surface area density (RSAD), and root volume density (RVD) on the anti-dip slope were higher compared to those on the dip slope. Additionally, the EC demonstrated the highest abundance in karst trough valley. ii) The Dc of different rock dip angles both dip and anti-dip slopes followed the order of 45° > 65° > 15°. The Dc of two grassland and bare land can be ranked as follows: EC < NR < BL. iii) The Dc of the dip/anti-dip slope showed a significant negative correlation with WSA, root diameter (RD), RLD, RSAD, and RVD (P < 0.05). iv) The results of the multivariate analysis of variance showed that the root traits had the highest contribution rate to Dc, followed by rock dip angles, and bedrock strata dip was the lowest. The resistance of EC to Dc is better under different rock dip angles of the dip/anti-dip slope. Therefore, expanding the coverage of EC across both dip and anti-dip slopes will contribute to mitigating soil erosion and facilitating ecosystem restoration. The research findings enhance the comprehension of soil erosion mechanisms in karst trough valley and facilitate the formulation of effective ecological restoration strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
岩溶槽谷不同岩石倾角对土壤剥离能力的响应
喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀明显且复杂,基岩地层倾角和根系特征对侵蚀坡面影响显著,从而改变水动力特征,影响Dc。因此,全面了解这些因素对岩溶槽谷直流的影响机制势在必行。样品采自两种天然草地:Erigeron canadensis (EC);纤维根)和雪梨(NR;抽根系统)和无根裸地(BL)作为对照。随后,在室内水力水槽中,以3种岩石倾角(15°、45°和65°)和3种倾斜/反倾斜坡度流速(60、80和100 L·min−1)对样品进行水流冲刷。结果表明:①反倾斜坡地土壤有机质(SOM)、水稳性团聚体(WSA)、根长密度(RLD)、根表面积密度(RSAD)和根体积密度(RVD)均高于顺倾斜坡地;在岩溶槽谷中,EC的丰度最高。ii)倾斜边坡和反倾斜边坡不同倾角的Dc均服从45°>的量级;65°比;15°。两种草地和裸地的Dc排序为:EC <;NR & lt;b . iii)倾斜/反倾斜坡面Dc与WSA、根径(RD)、RLD、RSAD和RVD呈显著负相关(P <;0.05)。(4)多变量方差分析结果表明,根系性状对Dc的贡献率最大,岩石倾角次之,基岩倾角最小。在倾斜/反倾斜边坡的不同岩石倾角下,EC对Dc的抵抗能力较好。因此,在倾斜和反倾斜斜坡上扩大生态系统的覆盖范围将有助于减轻土壤侵蚀和促进生态系统的恢复。研究结果有助于加深对喀斯特槽谷土壤侵蚀机理的认识,有助于制定有效的生态修复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
期刊最新文献
Seasonal soil water origins and determinants in an alpine hillslope on the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Low-severity wildfire prevents catastrophic impacts on fungal communities and soil carbon stability in a fire-affected Douglas-fir ecosystem Thermogravimetric data suggest synergy between different organic fractions and clay in soil structure formation Rhizodeposition stimulates soil carbon decomposition and promotes formation of mineral-associated carbon with increased clay content Mycorrhizal and nutrient controls of carbon sequestration in tropical rainforest soil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1