Recommendations for Mental Health Chatbot Conversations: An Integrative Review

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Advanced Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1111/jan.16762
Heidi Nieminen, Anna‐Kaisa Vartiainen, Raymond Bond, Emilia Laukkanen, Maurice Mulvenna, Lauri Kuosmanen
{"title":"Recommendations for Mental Health Chatbot Conversations: An Integrative Review","authors":"Heidi Nieminen, Anna‐Kaisa Vartiainen, Raymond Bond, Emilia Laukkanen, Maurice Mulvenna, Lauri Kuosmanen","doi":"10.1111/jan.16762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo identify and synthesise recommendations and guidelines for mental health chatbot conversational design.DesignIntegrative review.MethodsSuitable publications presenting recommendations or guidelines for mental health conversational design were included. The quality of included publications was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Thematic analysis was conducted.Data sourcesPrimary searches limited to last 10 years were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ACM Digital Library and EBSCO databases including APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, APA PsycArticles and MEDLINE in February 2023 and updated in October 2023. A secondary search was conducted in Google Scholar in May 2023.ResultsOf 1684 articles screened, 16 publications were selected. Three overarching themes were developed: (1) explicit knowledge about chatbot design and domain, (2) knowing your audience and (3) creating a safe space to engage. Results highlight that creating pleasant and effective conversations with a mental health chatbot requires careful and professional planning in advance, defining the target group and working together with it to address its needs and preferences. It is essential to emphasise the pleasant user experience and safety from both technical and psychological perspectives.ConclusionRecommendations for mental health chatbot conversational design have evolved and become more specific in recent years. Recommendations set high standards for mental health chatbots. To meet that, co‐design, explicit knowledge of the user needs, domain and conversational design is needed.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareMental health professionals participating in chatbot development can utilise this review. The results can also inform technical development teams not involving healthcare professionals directly.ImpactKnowledge of developing mental health chatbot conversations appears scattered. In mental health chatbots, features that enhance the chatbot's ability to meet users' needs and increase safety should be considered. This review is useful for developers of mental health chatbots and other health applications used independently.Reporting MethodThis integrative review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines, as applicable.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16762","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimTo identify and synthesise recommendations and guidelines for mental health chatbot conversational design.DesignIntegrative review.MethodsSuitable publications presenting recommendations or guidelines for mental health conversational design were included. The quality of included publications was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Thematic analysis was conducted.Data sourcesPrimary searches limited to last 10 years were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, ACM Digital Library and EBSCO databases including APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, APA PsycArticles and MEDLINE in February 2023 and updated in October 2023. A secondary search was conducted in Google Scholar in May 2023.ResultsOf 1684 articles screened, 16 publications were selected. Three overarching themes were developed: (1) explicit knowledge about chatbot design and domain, (2) knowing your audience and (3) creating a safe space to engage. Results highlight that creating pleasant and effective conversations with a mental health chatbot requires careful and professional planning in advance, defining the target group and working together with it to address its needs and preferences. It is essential to emphasise the pleasant user experience and safety from both technical and psychological perspectives.ConclusionRecommendations for mental health chatbot conversational design have evolved and become more specific in recent years. Recommendations set high standards for mental health chatbots. To meet that, co‐design, explicit knowledge of the user needs, domain and conversational design is needed.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareMental health professionals participating in chatbot development can utilise this review. The results can also inform technical development teams not involving healthcare professionals directly.ImpactKnowledge of developing mental health chatbot conversations appears scattered. In mental health chatbots, features that enhance the chatbot's ability to meet users' needs and increase safety should be considered. This review is useful for developers of mental health chatbots and other health applications used independently.Reporting MethodThis integrative review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines, as applicable.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理健康聊天机器人对话的建议:综合评价
目的确定和综合心理健康聊天机器人会话设计的建议和指南。DesignIntegrative审查。方法纳入有关心理健康对话设计建议或指南的合适出版物。使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所关键评估工具评估纳入出版物的质量。进行了专题分析。数据来源主要检索了PubMed、Scopus、ACM数字图书馆和EBSCO数据库,包括APA PsycINFO、CINAHL、APA PsycArticles和MEDLINE,检索时间为2023年2月,更新时间为2023年10月。2023年5月在b谷歌Scholar上进行了二次检索。结果从1684篇文献中筛选出16篇出版物。开发了三个总体主题:(1)关于聊天机器人设计和领域的明确知识;(2)了解您的受众;(3)创建一个安全的参与空间。研究结果强调,与心理健康聊天机器人进行愉快而有效的对话需要事先进行仔细而专业的规划,确定目标群体,并与之合作,以满足其需求和偏好。从技术和心理的角度强调用户的愉悦体验和安全性是至关重要的。结论近年来,心理健康聊天机器人会话设计的建议不断发展,并变得更加具体。建议为心理健康聊天机器人设定了高标准。为了满足这一需求,需要共同设计、明确的用户需求知识、领域和会话设计。对专业和/或患者护理的启示参与聊天机器人开发的心理健康专业人员可以利用本综述。结果还可以通知不直接涉及医疗保健专业人员的技术开发团队。关于开发心理健康聊天机器人对话的知识似乎很分散。在心理健康聊天机器人中,应该考虑增强聊天机器人满足用户需求的能力和增加安全性的功能。这篇综述对心理健康聊天机器人和其他独立使用的健康应用程序的开发人员很有用。报告方法本综合评价按照PRISMA指南(如适用)进行报告。病人或公众捐款:没有病人或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in Disease Burden, Symptom Burden, and Quality of Life Among People Living With Heart Failure and Multimorbidity: Cross‐Sectional Study How Hiring Process Satisfaction Influences Nursing Staff's Willingness to Recommend Their Organisation: A Mixed Methods Study Predictive Model for Hypoglycaemia Risk in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients During the Peri-Colonoscopy Period: A Retrospective Cohort Study Monitoring the Sustainability of a Breastfeeding Guideline During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study Factors Influencing Nurses' Culturally Competent Cancer Care for LGBT Individuals in Taiwan: A Qualitative Study Applying the Socio-Ecological Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1