Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Decarbonization Potential of Global Fired Clay Brick Production

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL 环境科学与技术 Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1021/acs.est.4c08994
Josefine A. Olsson, Hisham Hafez, Sabbie A. Miller, Karen L. Scrivener
{"title":"Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Decarbonization Potential of Global Fired Clay Brick Production","authors":"Josefine A. Olsson, Hisham Hafez, Sabbie A. Miller, Karen L. Scrivener","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c08994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fired clay bricks (FCBs) are a dominant building material globally due to their low cost and simplicity of production, especially in low- and middle-income countries. With a projected rising housing demand, commensurate growth in brick demand is anticipated, the production of which could result in significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Robust models are needed to estimate brick demand and emissions to systematically address decarbonization pathways. Few sources report production values; hence, we present two novel proxy models: (i) a consumption prediction model, relying on country-specific clay extraction data, dynamic building stock modeling, and average material intensity use allowing for projections to 2050; and (ii) a GHG emissions model, using literature-based data and production technology-specific inputs. Based on these models, the current global FCB consumption is estimated as 2.18 Gt annually, resulting in approximately 500 million tCO<sub>2</sub>e (1% of current global GHG emissions). If unaddressed, this fraction could increase to 3.5–5% in 2050 considering a moderate SSP 2-4.5 climate change mitigation scenario. Consequently, we explored three potential decarbonization pathways: (i) improving energy efficiency; (ii) shifting production to best practices; and (iii) replacing half of FCB demand with hollow concrete blocks, resulting in 27%, 49%, and 51% reduction in GHG emissions, respectively.","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fired clay bricks (FCBs) are a dominant building material globally due to their low cost and simplicity of production, especially in low- and middle-income countries. With a projected rising housing demand, commensurate growth in brick demand is anticipated, the production of which could result in significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Robust models are needed to estimate brick demand and emissions to systematically address decarbonization pathways. Few sources report production values; hence, we present two novel proxy models: (i) a consumption prediction model, relying on country-specific clay extraction data, dynamic building stock modeling, and average material intensity use allowing for projections to 2050; and (ii) a GHG emissions model, using literature-based data and production technology-specific inputs. Based on these models, the current global FCB consumption is estimated as 2.18 Gt annually, resulting in approximately 500 million tCO2e (1% of current global GHG emissions). If unaddressed, this fraction could increase to 3.5–5% in 2050 considering a moderate SSP 2-4.5 climate change mitigation scenario. Consequently, we explored three potential decarbonization pathways: (i) improving energy efficiency; (ii) shifting production to best practices; and (iii) replacing half of FCB demand with hollow concrete blocks, resulting in 27%, 49%, and 51% reduction in GHG emissions, respectively.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球烧制粘土砖生产的温室气体排放和脱碳潜力
烧制粘土砖(fcb)因其低成本和生产简单而成为全球主要的建筑材料,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。随着住房需求的增长,预计砖的需求也会相应增长,砖的生产可能会导致大量的温室气体(GHG)排放。需要稳健的模型来估计砖的需求和排放,以系统地解决脱碳途径。很少有来源报告产值;因此,我们提出了两种新的代理模型:(i)消费预测模型,该模型依赖于特定国家的粘土提取数据、动态建筑库存模型和允许预测到2050年的平均材料强度使用;(ii)温室气体排放模型,使用基于文献的数据和特定生产技术的投入。根据这些模型,目前全球FCB消费量估计为每年21.8亿吨,产生约5亿吨二氧化碳当量(占当前全球温室气体排放量的1%)。如果不加以解决,考虑到温和的SSP 2-4.5气候变化减缓情景,这一比例可能在2050年增加到3.5-5%。因此,我们探索了三种潜在的脱碳途径:(1)提高能源效率;(ii)将生产转向最佳做法;(iii)用空心混凝土砌块取代一半的燃料电池需求,分别减少27%、49%和51%的温室气体排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
期刊最新文献
An Overview of Potential Alternatives for the Multiple Uses of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances Vegetation Fire Emissions Exacerbate Glacier Melting on the Third Pole Role of Heterogeneous Reactions in the Atmospheric Oxidizing Capacity in Island Environments Assessing the Efficacy of Pyrolysis–Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for Nanoplastic and Microplastic Analysis in Human Blood Opportunities and Challenges of a Cap-and-Trade System for Plastics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1