AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Prevention and Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in At-Risk Individuals

IF 25.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.008
Faisal S. Ali, Mindie H. Nguyen, Ruben Hernaez, Daniel Q. Huang, Julius Wilder, Alejandro Piscoya, Tracey G. Simon, Yngve Falck-Ytter
{"title":"AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Prevention and Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in At-Risk Individuals","authors":"Faisal S. Ali, Mindie H. Nguyen, Ruben Hernaez, Daniel Q. Huang, Julius Wilder, Alejandro Piscoya, Tracey G. Simon, Yngve Falck-Ytter","doi":"10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3>Hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) can occur due to a variety of immune-modulating exposures, including multiple drug classes and disease states. Antiviral prophylaxis can be effective in mitigating the risk of HBVr. In select cases, clinical monitoring without antiviral prophylaxis is sufficient for managing the risk of HBVr. This clinical practice guideline update aims to inform frontline health care practitioners by providing evidence-based practice recommendation for the management of HBVr in at-risk individuals.<h3>Methods</h3>The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel conducted a systematic evidence review to identify new studies since publication of the first version of this clinical practice guideline in 2014. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop recommendations regarding the role of antiviral prophylaxis and monitoring without antiviral prophylaxis for management of HBVr. Clinical recommendations were based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations.<h3>Results</h3>The panel agreed on 4 recommendations. Based on evidence and baseline risk assessment, the panel made a strong recommendation in favor of antiviral prophylaxis for individuals at high risk of HBVr. For individuals at moderate risk of HBVr, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of antiviral prophylaxis. For individuals at low risk of HBVr, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of monitoring alone without antiviral prophylaxis. Monitoring should be performed at 1- to 3-month intervals, and must include assessment of hepatitis B viral load in addition to assessment of alanine aminotransferase. For individuals deemed to be at-risk of HBVr, the panel agreed on a strong recommendation in favor of testing for HBV; given universal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention screening guidance for hepatitis B for all adults 18 years and older by testing for HBV surface antigen, hepatitis B surface antibody, and total hepatitis B core antibody, stratifying screening practices by magnitude of HBVr risk is no longer needed.<h3>Conclusions</h3>This document provides updated guidance for the management of HBVr in at-risk individuals. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted. This guideline is expected to require updating in 5 years from publication.","PeriodicalId":12590,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

Hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) can occur due to a variety of immune-modulating exposures, including multiple drug classes and disease states. Antiviral prophylaxis can be effective in mitigating the risk of HBVr. In select cases, clinical monitoring without antiviral prophylaxis is sufficient for managing the risk of HBVr. This clinical practice guideline update aims to inform frontline health care practitioners by providing evidence-based practice recommendation for the management of HBVr in at-risk individuals.

Methods

The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel conducted a systematic evidence review to identify new studies since publication of the first version of this clinical practice guideline in 2014. The Evidence to Decision framework was used to develop recommendations regarding the role of antiviral prophylaxis and monitoring without antiviral prophylaxis for management of HBVr. Clinical recommendations were based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations.

Results

The panel agreed on 4 recommendations. Based on evidence and baseline risk assessment, the panel made a strong recommendation in favor of antiviral prophylaxis for individuals at high risk of HBVr. For individuals at moderate risk of HBVr, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of antiviral prophylaxis. For individuals at low risk of HBVr, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of monitoring alone without antiviral prophylaxis. Monitoring should be performed at 1- to 3-month intervals, and must include assessment of hepatitis B viral load in addition to assessment of alanine aminotransferase. For individuals deemed to be at-risk of HBVr, the panel agreed on a strong recommendation in favor of testing for HBV; given universal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention screening guidance for hepatitis B for all adults 18 years and older by testing for HBV surface antigen, hepatitis B surface antibody, and total hepatitis B core antibody, stratifying screening practices by magnitude of HBVr risk is no longer needed.

Conclusions

This document provides updated guidance for the management of HBVr in at-risk individuals. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted. This guideline is expected to require updating in 5 years from publication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防和治疗高危人群乙型肝炎病毒再激活的AGA临床实践指南
背景,目的乙型肝炎再激活(HBVr)可由于多种免疫调节暴露而发生,包括多种药物类别和疾病状态。抗病毒预防可有效减轻乙型肝炎病毒感染的风险。在某些情况下,不进行抗病毒预防的临床监测足以控制乙肝病毒感染的风险。本临床实践指南更新旨在通过为高危人群HBVr管理提供循证实践建议,告知一线卫生保健从业人员。方法采用建议分级评估、制定和评价框架,对证据进行评估并提出建议。该小组进行了系统的证据审查,以确定自2014年该临床实践指南第一版发布以来的新研究。决策证据框架用于制定关于抗病毒预防和无抗病毒预防监测在乙肝病毒感染管理中的作用的建议。临床建议是基于期望和不期望的效果、患者价值、成本和健康公平考虑之间的平衡。专家组就4项建议达成一致。基于证据和基线风险评估,专家组强烈建议HBVr高危人群进行抗病毒预防。对于HBVr风险中等的个体,有条件地推荐抗病毒预防。对于HBVr风险低的个体,有条件地建议单独监测而不进行抗病毒预防。监测应每隔1- 3个月进行一次,除评估丙氨酸转氨酶外,还必须包括评估乙型肝炎病毒载量。对于被认为有HBVr风险的个体,专家组同意强烈建议进行HBV检测;鉴于疾病控制和预防中心对所有18岁及以上成年人进行乙型肝炎筛查指导,通过检测HBV表面抗原、乙型肝炎表面抗体和乙型肝炎总核心抗体,不再需要按HBVr风险程度分层筛查。本文件为高危人群HBVr的管理提供了最新的指导。强调了证据的局限性和差距。本指南预计需要在出版后5年内更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastroenterology
Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
45.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
4366
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology is the most prominent journal in the field of gastrointestinal disease. It is the flagship journal of the American Gastroenterological Association and delivers authoritative coverage of clinical, translational, and basic studies of all aspects of the digestive system, including the liver and pancreas, as well as nutrition. Some regular features of Gastroenterology include original research studies by leading authorities, comprehensive reviews and perspectives on important topics in adult and pediatric gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal also includes features such as editorials, correspondence, and commentaries, as well as special sections like "Mentoring, Education and Training Corner," "Diversity, Equity and Inclusion in GI," "Gastro Digest," "Gastro Curbside Consult," and "Gastro Grand Rounds." Gastroenterology also provides digital media materials such as videos and "GI Rapid Reel" animations. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases including Scopus, Biological Abstracts, Current Contents, Embase, Nutrition Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, Current Awareness in Biological Sciences, PubMed/Medline, and the Science Citation Index.
期刊最新文献
AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Prevention and Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in At-Risk Individuals Continuing the Commitment to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Within AGA Journals Spotlight: Prevention and Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in At-Risk Individuals Elsewhere in The AGA Journals (Preview Section) Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: A randomized, single-center trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1