Addressing Gambling Harm to affected others: A scoping review (part II: Coping, assessment and treatment)

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102543
N.A. Dowling, C.O. Hawker, S.S. Merkouris, S.N. Rodda, D.C. Hodgins
{"title":"Addressing Gambling Harm to affected others: A scoping review (part II: Coping, assessment and treatment)","authors":"N.A. Dowling, C.O. Hawker, S.S. Merkouris, S.N. Rodda, D.C. Hodgins","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public health definitions of gambling-related harm include risks to family members and friends. This scoping review broadly aims to identify recent research on addressing gambling harm to adult affected others, focusing on prevalence, socio-demographic profiles, gambling profiles, and harm (Part I); and coping strategies, assessment, and treatment (Part II). A systematic search of electronic databases identified 121 studies published from 2000, with 82 focusing on coping strategies (22.3 %), assessment (21.5 %), and treatment (39.7 %). Findings revealed affected others employ various coping strategies, which can be gambler- or family-focussed, before accessing other forms of support. Common strategies include financial strategies and informal support but few studies have assessed their effectiveness. Few brief fit-for-purpose instruments with adequate psychometric evaluation are available to assess affected other status, harm, coping, social support, and help-seeking. Affected others are under-represented in treatment (8 % in general practices, 15 %–26 % in online gambling services, 30 %–43 % in gambling helplines), largely due to various barriers, including a lack of service awareness and shame. Low-intensity internet-delivered interventions show promise and can reach affected others who would not otherwise receive professional help. Other affected other interventions, which can be gambler- and/or family-focused, demonstrate good acceptability but somewhat limited efficacy, while couple interventions demonstrate some promising outcomes, although more rigorous evaluations are needed. The diverse treatment needs and preferences of affected others, coupled with the relatively limited efficacy of current treatments, highlight the need for the development of tailored interventions. The findings of this review can be used to inform clinical, research, and policy decision-making.","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102543","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public health definitions of gambling-related harm include risks to family members and friends. This scoping review broadly aims to identify recent research on addressing gambling harm to adult affected others, focusing on prevalence, socio-demographic profiles, gambling profiles, and harm (Part I); and coping strategies, assessment, and treatment (Part II). A systematic search of electronic databases identified 121 studies published from 2000, with 82 focusing on coping strategies (22.3 %), assessment (21.5 %), and treatment (39.7 %). Findings revealed affected others employ various coping strategies, which can be gambler- or family-focussed, before accessing other forms of support. Common strategies include financial strategies and informal support but few studies have assessed their effectiveness. Few brief fit-for-purpose instruments with adequate psychometric evaluation are available to assess affected other status, harm, coping, social support, and help-seeking. Affected others are under-represented in treatment (8 % in general practices, 15 %–26 % in online gambling services, 30 %–43 % in gambling helplines), largely due to various barriers, including a lack of service awareness and shame. Low-intensity internet-delivered interventions show promise and can reach affected others who would not otherwise receive professional help. Other affected other interventions, which can be gambler- and/or family-focused, demonstrate good acceptability but somewhat limited efficacy, while couple interventions demonstrate some promising outcomes, although more rigorous evaluations are needed. The diverse treatment needs and preferences of affected others, coupled with the relatively limited efficacy of current treatments, highlight the need for the development of tailored interventions. The findings of this review can be used to inform clinical, research, and policy decision-making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决赌博对受影响的人的伤害:范围审查(第二部分:应对,评估和治疗)
与赌博有关的危害的公共卫生定义包括对家庭成员和朋友的风险。这一范围审查的广泛目的是确定最近的研究解决赌博危害成人受影响的其他人,侧重于患病率,社会人口概况,赌博概况和伤害(第一部分);对2000年以来发表的121项研究进行了系统检索,其中82项研究集中于应对策略(22.3%)、评估(21.5%)和治疗(39.7%)。调查结果显示,在获得其他形式的支持之前,受影响的人采用了各种应对策略,可以以赌徒或家庭为中心。常见的策略包括财务策略和非正式支持,但很少有研究评估其有效性。很少有简短的适合目的的工具有足够的心理测量评估可用于评估受影响的其他状态,伤害,应对,社会支持和寻求帮助。受影响的其他人在治疗方面的代表性不足(在一般做法中占8%,在在线赌博服务中占15% - 26%,在赌博热线中占30% - 43%),主要是由于各种障碍,包括缺乏服务意识和羞耻感。互联网提供的低强度干预显示出希望,并且可以触及到其他无法获得专业帮助的受影响人群。其他受影响的干预措施,可能以赌徒和/或家庭为中心,表现出良好的可接受性,但效果有限,而夫妻干预措施表现出一些有希望的结果,尽管需要更严格的评估。受影响者的不同治疗需求和偏好,加上目前治疗方法的疗效相对有限,突出表明需要制定有针对性的干预措施。本综述的发现可用于临床、研究和政策决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
What is fidelity? A systematic review of provider fidelity and its associations with engagement and outcomes in parenting programs. Prevalence of mental health conditions, substance use disorders, suicidal ideation and attempts, and experiences of homelessness among Veterans with criminal-legal involvement: A meta-analysis. System justification, subjective well-being, and mental health symptoms in members of disadvantaged minority groups. Addressing Gambling Harm to affected others: A scoping review (part II: Coping, assessment and treatment) Talking about trauma: A systematic review of young people's reactions to trauma-focused research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1