Study of relation of continuing medical education to quality of family physicians' care.

E V Dunn, M J Bass, J I Williams, A E Borgiel, P MacDonald, R A Spasoff
{"title":"Study of relation of continuing medical education to quality of family physicians' care.","authors":"E V Dunn,&nbsp;M J Bass,&nbsp;J I Williams,&nbsp;A E Borgiel,&nbsp;P MacDonald,&nbsp;R A Spasoff","doi":"10.1097/00001888-198810000-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A random sample of 120 physicians in Ontario was studied to assess quality of care in primary care and test an hypothesis that quality of care was related to continuing medical education (CME) activities. The quality-of-care scores were obtained by an in-office audit of a random selection of charts. The scores were global scores for charting, prevention, the use of 13 classes of drugs, and care of a two-year period for 182 different diagnoses. There were no relationships between global quality-of-care scores based on these randomly chosen charts and either the type or quantity of the physicians' CME activities. These activities were reading journals, attending rounds, attending scientific conferences, having informal consultations, using audio and video cassettes, and engaging in self-assessment. The implications of these findings are significant for future research in CME and for planners of present CME programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":31052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00001888-198810000-00005","citationCount":"30","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-198810000-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

Abstract

A random sample of 120 physicians in Ontario was studied to assess quality of care in primary care and test an hypothesis that quality of care was related to continuing medical education (CME) activities. The quality-of-care scores were obtained by an in-office audit of a random selection of charts. The scores were global scores for charting, prevention, the use of 13 classes of drugs, and care of a two-year period for 182 different diagnoses. There were no relationships between global quality-of-care scores based on these randomly chosen charts and either the type or quantity of the physicians' CME activities. These activities were reading journals, attending rounds, attending scientific conferences, having informal consultations, using audio and video cassettes, and engaging in self-assessment. The implications of these findings are significant for future research in CME and for planners of present CME programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
继续医学教育与家庭医生护理质量的关系研究。
对安大略省120名医生的随机样本进行了研究,以评估初级保健的护理质量,并检验护理质量与继续医学教育(CME)活动有关的假设。护理质量得分是通过对随机选择的图表进行办公室审计获得的。这些分数是对图表、预防、13类药物的使用以及182种不同诊断的两年护理的全球得分。基于这些随机选择的图表的全球护理质量得分与医生CME活动的类型或数量之间没有关系。这些活动包括阅读期刊、参加查房、参加科学会议、进行非正式磋商、使用录音带和录像带以及进行自我评价。这些发现对未来的CME研究和当前CME计划的规划具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Status of Competency-Oriented in Medical Science Education in Iran Designing an Application to Empower Academic Staff Members in the Field of E-Learning Design and Development of Electronic Moulage of Brachial Plexus Muscles to Enhance the Learning of Upper Limb Anatomy: An Interventional Study Applying a Meta-synthesis Approach to Present a Blended Learning Model for Talent Development How to Develop a Memory Game for Clinical Courses: A Leading Approach to the Interaction of Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1