Mechanistic investigation of impact of malic acid, ultrasound and dual treatment on starch digestibility of cooked whole rice grains

IF 12.5 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Carbohydrate Polymers Pub Date : 2025-03-15 Epub Date: 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123230
Xinyi Chen , Xiaowei Zhang , Enpeng Li , Cheng Li
{"title":"Mechanistic investigation of impact of malic acid, ultrasound and dual treatment on starch digestibility of cooked whole rice grains","authors":"Xinyi Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Zhang ,&nbsp;Enpeng Li ,&nbsp;Cheng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.carbpol.2025.123230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Physical, chemical, and dual modifications can all significantly affect the digestibility of isolated rice granules, while their effects on the starch digestibility of whole cooked rice grains remain elusive. Therefore, the impact of malic acid, ultrasound, and ultrasound + malic acid dual treatment on the starch digestibility of cooked rice grains with different starch molecular structures was investigated in this study. Ultrasound mainly caused cavitation on the surface of rice grains, promoting the leaching of materials (&gt; 11 %) and amylose during cooking. This led to a faster retrogradation rate, smaller pores, and a lower maximum starch digestion extent. In contrast, malic acid caused a faster digestion rate due to the significant degradation of starch molecules, although its moderate esterification smoothed the cooked rice grain surface and slightly reduced the maximum starch digestion extent. Compared to malic acid treatment, the dual treatment showed a much higher degree of esterification, which may thus contribute to its significantly lower maximum starch digestion extent (up to 21 %). Collectively, these findings suggest that both ultrasound and dual treatment can be effective strategies for producing cooked rice grains with slower starch digestibility, with implications for improving the public health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":261,"journal":{"name":"Carbohydrate Polymers","volume":"352 ","pages":"Article 123230"},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbohydrate Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861725000116","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physical, chemical, and dual modifications can all significantly affect the digestibility of isolated rice granules, while their effects on the starch digestibility of whole cooked rice grains remain elusive. Therefore, the impact of malic acid, ultrasound, and ultrasound + malic acid dual treatment on the starch digestibility of cooked rice grains with different starch molecular structures was investigated in this study. Ultrasound mainly caused cavitation on the surface of rice grains, promoting the leaching of materials (> 11 %) and amylose during cooking. This led to a faster retrogradation rate, smaller pores, and a lower maximum starch digestion extent. In contrast, malic acid caused a faster digestion rate due to the significant degradation of starch molecules, although its moderate esterification smoothed the cooked rice grain surface and slightly reduced the maximum starch digestion extent. Compared to malic acid treatment, the dual treatment showed a much higher degree of esterification, which may thus contribute to its significantly lower maximum starch digestion extent (up to 21 %). Collectively, these findings suggest that both ultrasound and dual treatment can be effective strategies for producing cooked rice grains with slower starch digestibility, with implications for improving the public health.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
苹果酸、超声及双重处理对熟全米淀粉消化率影响的机理研究。
物理、化学和双重改性均能显著影响离体米粒的消化率,而对全熟米粒淀粉消化率的影响尚不明确。因此,本研究考察了苹果酸、超声、超声+苹果酸双重处理对不同淀粉分子结构的熟米粒淀粉消化率的影响。超声波主要引起米粒表面空化,促进蒸煮过程中物料(> - 11%)和直链淀粉的浸出。这导致了更快的降解速度,更小的孔隙,和更低的最大淀粉消化程度。相比之下,苹果酸由于淀粉分子的显著降解,导致消化速度更快,尽管其适度的酯化作用使煮熟的米粒表面光滑,并略微降低了淀粉的最大消化程度。与苹果酸处理相比,双重处理的酯化程度要高得多,这可能是其最大淀粉消化程度显著低于苹果酸处理的原因(高达21%)。总的来说,这些发现表明,超声波和双重处理可以有效地生产淀粉消化率较低的熟米粒,这对改善公众健康具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
文献相关原料
公司名称
产品信息
阿拉丁
Malic acid
来源期刊
Carbohydrate Polymers
Carbohydrate Polymers 化学-高分子科学
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
1286
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Carbohydrate Polymers stands as a prominent journal in the glycoscience field, dedicated to exploring and harnessing the potential of polysaccharides with applications spanning bioenergy, bioplastics, biomaterials, biorefining, chemistry, drug delivery, food, health, nanotechnology, packaging, paper, pharmaceuticals, medicine, oil recovery, textiles, tissue engineering, wood, and various aspects of glycoscience. The journal emphasizes the central role of well-characterized carbohydrate polymers, highlighting their significance as the primary focus rather than a peripheral topic. Each paper must prominently feature at least one named carbohydrate polymer, evident in both citation and title, with a commitment to innovative research that advances scientific knowledge.
期刊最新文献
A pH/heating-driven curdlan-based complementary hydrogel for promoting full-thickness skin wound healing Partial debranching and microwave treatment stabilize amylopectin-flavor interactions for better tsampa processing outcomes Coordinated optimization of 3′-phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS) supply and sulfotransferase expression in Escherichia coli for production of chondroitin sulfate A with high sulfation degree Solvent-free, one-pot mechanochemical synthesis of high-DS cellulose esters with tunable thermoplasticity A sulfated manno-glucuronan ameliorates β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes by targeting ALDH1A3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1