Retrospective cross-sectional study on bronchiectasis in adult Aboriginal Australians: disease characteristics and comparison with ethnically diverse global bronchiectasis registry cohorts.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMJ Open Respiratory Research Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002139
Subash Heraganahally, Claire Gibbs, Shiidheshwar J Ravichandran, Davaadorj Erdenebayar, Winnie Chen, Asanga Abeyaratne, Hubertus Jersmann, Lata Jayaram, Timothy Howarth
{"title":"Retrospective cross-sectional study on bronchiectasis in adult Aboriginal Australians: disease characteristics and comparison with ethnically diverse global bronchiectasis registry cohorts.","authors":"Subash Heraganahally, Claire Gibbs, Shiidheshwar J Ravichandran, Davaadorj Erdenebayar, Winnie Chen, Asanga Abeyaratne, Hubertus Jersmann, Lata Jayaram, Timothy Howarth","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, adult Indigenous people, including Aboriginal Australians, have a high burden of chronic respiratory disorders, and bronchiectasis is no exception. However, literature detailing bronchiectasis disease characteristics among adult Indigenous people is sparse. This study assessed the clinical profile of bronchiectasis among adult Aboriginal Australians and compared against previously published international bronchiectasis registry reports.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aboriginal Australians aged >18 years with chest CT confirmed bronchiectasis between 2011 and 2020 in the Top End Northern Territory of Australia were included. Demographics, chest CT findings, pulmonary function results, sputum microbiology, coexistent medical comorbidities, and pharmacotherapy use were assessed and compared against five published international bronchiectasis registry reports (Australian (ABR), European (European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC)-Europe), Indian (EMBARC-India), Korean (KMBARC) and the USA (USBRR)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 459 patients were assessed. In comparison with international and non-Aboriginal Australian national cohorts, Aboriginal Australians were younger (median 56 years (IQR (48, 65)); however, sex distribution (55% female) and body mass index (23 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (IQR 19.4-27)) were comparable . Smoking rates were higher at 85% compared with other registry cohorts (22-46%) as was the prevalence of comorbidities (97%): cardiovascular diseases (73%), diabetes mellitus (50%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (83%) compared with other registry cohorts (4-32%; 6-14%; and 14-37%, respectively). Spirometry demonstrated forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 38% predicted in comparison with 61-77% in other cohorts. Sputum microbiology showed <i>Haemophilus influenzae</i> (57%) isolated at 3.4 to 6 times the rate of other registry cohorts and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> in 31%. Chest CT demonstrated multilobar and lower lobes involvement in 73% and inhaled pharmacotherapy use was recorded in up to 62% and long-term antibiotics in 5%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The overall bronchiectasis disease burden is higher in Aboriginal Australian adults in comparison with global ethnically diverse non-Indigenous populations. Further efforts are required to address this disparity secondary to bronchiectasis among Indigenous people.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, adult Indigenous people, including Aboriginal Australians, have a high burden of chronic respiratory disorders, and bronchiectasis is no exception. However, literature detailing bronchiectasis disease characteristics among adult Indigenous people is sparse. This study assessed the clinical profile of bronchiectasis among adult Aboriginal Australians and compared against previously published international bronchiectasis registry reports.

Methods: Aboriginal Australians aged >18 years with chest CT confirmed bronchiectasis between 2011 and 2020 in the Top End Northern Territory of Australia were included. Demographics, chest CT findings, pulmonary function results, sputum microbiology, coexistent medical comorbidities, and pharmacotherapy use were assessed and compared against five published international bronchiectasis registry reports (Australian (ABR), European (European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC)-Europe), Indian (EMBARC-India), Korean (KMBARC) and the USA (USBRR)).

Results: A total of 459 patients were assessed. In comparison with international and non-Aboriginal Australian national cohorts, Aboriginal Australians were younger (median 56 years (IQR (48, 65)); however, sex distribution (55% female) and body mass index (23 kg/m2 (IQR 19.4-27)) were comparable . Smoking rates were higher at 85% compared with other registry cohorts (22-46%) as was the prevalence of comorbidities (97%): cardiovascular diseases (73%), diabetes mellitus (50%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (83%) compared with other registry cohorts (4-32%; 6-14%; and 14-37%, respectively). Spirometry demonstrated forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 38% predicted in comparison with 61-77% in other cohorts. Sputum microbiology showed Haemophilus influenzae (57%) isolated at 3.4 to 6 times the rate of other registry cohorts and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 31%. Chest CT demonstrated multilobar and lower lobes involvement in 73% and inhaled pharmacotherapy use was recorded in up to 62% and long-term antibiotics in 5%.

Conclusion: The overall bronchiectasis disease burden is higher in Aboriginal Australian adults in comparison with global ethnically diverse non-Indigenous populations. Further efforts are required to address this disparity secondary to bronchiectasis among Indigenous people.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚成年原住民支气管扩张的回顾性横断面研究:疾病特征和与不同种族的全球支气管扩张登记队列的比较。
背景:在全球范围内,成年土著人,包括澳大利亚土著人,慢性呼吸系统疾病的负担很高,支气管扩张也不例外。然而,文献详细说明支气管扩张疾病的特点在成年土著居民是稀少的。本研究评估了成年澳大利亚土著居民支气管扩张的临床概况,并与先前发表的国际支气管扩张登记报告进行了比较。方法:纳入2011年至2020年在澳大利亚北领地(Top End Northern Territory)年龄为bbb18岁、胸部CT确诊支气管扩张的澳大利亚原住民。统计数据、胸部CT检查结果、肺功能结果、痰微生物学、共存的医学合并症和药物治疗使用进行了评估,并与五份已发表的国际支气管扩张登记报告(澳大利亚(ABR)、欧洲(欧洲多中心支气管扩张审计和研究合作(EMBARC)-欧洲)、印度(EMBARC-印度)、韩国(KMBARC)和美国(USBRR))进行了比较。结果:共纳入459例患者。与国际和非土著澳大利亚国民队列相比,土著澳大利亚人更年轻(中位数为56岁(IQR (48,65));然而,性别分布(55%为女性)和体重指数(23 kg/m2 (IQR 19.4-27))具有可比性。与其他登记队列相比,吸烟率为85%(22-46%),合并症患病率(97%):心血管疾病(73%),糖尿病(50%)和慢性阻塞性肺病(83%)与其他登记队列相比(4-32%);6 - 14%;和14-37%)。肺活量测定显示,1 s的用力呼气量预测为38%,而其他队列的预测为61-77%。痰微生物学显示流感嗜血杆菌(57%)的分离率为其他登记队列的3.4至6倍,铜绿假单胞菌的分离率为31%。胸部CT显示73%的患者受累于多肺叶和下肺叶,62%的患者使用吸入药物治疗,5%的患者使用长期抗生素。结论:与全球不同种族的非土著人群相比,澳大利亚土著成年人的总体支气管扩张疾病负担更高。需要进一步努力解决土著居民中继发于支气管扩张的这种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Value of EBUS-guided Transbronchial MEdiastinal Cryobiopsy versus ConvenTIONal Bronchoscopic Approaches for Intrathoracic Stage I/II SARcoidosis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (DETECTION-SAR-II). Management of malignant pleural effusions using an indwelling tunnelled pleural catheter and non-vacuum collection system. Indoor air quality and its impacts on asthma and COPD. Predicting clinical remission in biologic-treated severe asthma: development of a practical scoring system from a Japanese multicentre study. Nationwide trends in AECOPD care in Italy before, during and after COVID-19: discrepancies between data sources and across regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1