Microsurgical Repair of Large Nasal Septal Defects: Microsurgical Repair of Large Nasal Septal Defects.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004218
Robert L Walton, Nicole Gherlone, Jenny Bai
{"title":"Microsurgical Repair of Large Nasal Septal Defects: Microsurgical Repair of Large Nasal Septal Defects.","authors":"Robert L Walton, Nicole Gherlone, Jenny Bai","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nasal septal defects cause considerable morbidity and represent a challenging reconstructive problem. Traditional repair techniques have employed local intranasal tissues and allograft adjuncts. For large septal defects (>4-5 cm2), less than half are successfully resolved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients presenting with large (>4 cm2) nasal septal defects treated by microsurgical septal reconstruction using various engineered or prelaminated flaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine consecutive patients were included in this study. Defect size averaged 7.89 cm2 (range 4.5-13.5 cm2). There were 4 males/5 females. Average age was 49.3 years (range 34.4-76.2 years). Follow-up averaged 10.1 years (range 1.3-25.8 years). Etiology of the septal defects included cocaine (4), neoplasm (2), surgery (1), autoimmune disease (1), and infection (1). Flaps utilized: prelaminated radial forearm flap (3), prelaminated (skin only) radial forearm flap (3), folded radial forearm flap (1), first dorsal metacarpal artery flap (1), and engineered superficial inferior epigastric artery flap (1). There were no flap losses. Recurrent septal perforation occurred in 3 patients. The first patient developed a small 0.5-cm diameter anterior perforation that was the result of a local infection. This was successfully closed using local mucosal flaps. Recurrent septal perforations (each less than 1-cm diameter) were identified in 2 additional patients. In each of these patients, the perforation was located at the posterior, inferior aspect of the septal repair site. An attempt to repair one of these defects was unsuccessful but the defect has remained stable and asymptomatic. Similarly, the other recurrent perforation has also remained asymptomatic and is being managed conservatively. The remaining healed septal defects have remained stable over time without airway obstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This experience underscores the significant clinical challenges confronting repair of large nasal septal defects. Our results demonstrate the safety and utility of microsurgical reconstruction in this setting. Technical precision in flap inset has emerged as a key requisite for a successful outcome. The application of engineered/prelaminated flaps for these defects represents a novel approach to management.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004218","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nasal septal defects cause considerable morbidity and represent a challenging reconstructive problem. Traditional repair techniques have employed local intranasal tissues and allograft adjuncts. For large septal defects (>4-5 cm2), less than half are successfully resolved.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients presenting with large (>4 cm2) nasal septal defects treated by microsurgical septal reconstruction using various engineered or prelaminated flaps.

Results: Nine consecutive patients were included in this study. Defect size averaged 7.89 cm2 (range 4.5-13.5 cm2). There were 4 males/5 females. Average age was 49.3 years (range 34.4-76.2 years). Follow-up averaged 10.1 years (range 1.3-25.8 years). Etiology of the septal defects included cocaine (4), neoplasm (2), surgery (1), autoimmune disease (1), and infection (1). Flaps utilized: prelaminated radial forearm flap (3), prelaminated (skin only) radial forearm flap (3), folded radial forearm flap (1), first dorsal metacarpal artery flap (1), and engineered superficial inferior epigastric artery flap (1). There were no flap losses. Recurrent septal perforation occurred in 3 patients. The first patient developed a small 0.5-cm diameter anterior perforation that was the result of a local infection. This was successfully closed using local mucosal flaps. Recurrent septal perforations (each less than 1-cm diameter) were identified in 2 additional patients. In each of these patients, the perforation was located at the posterior, inferior aspect of the septal repair site. An attempt to repair one of these defects was unsuccessful but the defect has remained stable and asymptomatic. Similarly, the other recurrent perforation has also remained asymptomatic and is being managed conservatively. The remaining healed septal defects have remained stable over time without airway obstruction.

Conclusions: This experience underscores the significant clinical challenges confronting repair of large nasal septal defects. Our results demonstrate the safety and utility of microsurgical reconstruction in this setting. Technical precision in flap inset has emerged as a key requisite for a successful outcome. The application of engineered/prelaminated flaps for these defects represents a novel approach to management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Hourglass Constriction of a Single Fascicle of the Anterior Interosseous Nerve: A Case Report. Interprogram Differences in Core General, Core Plastic, and Plastic Surgery-Adjacent Training. Simple Approach to Cosmetic Medial Epicanthoplasty: A Modification of the Skin Redraping Method. The Impact of International Fellowship on Research Productivity: International Fellowship on Research Productivity. Mandible Fracture Outcome Disparities in the Incarcerated Patient Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1