The simpler modified fried frailty scale predicts 2-year mortality in older adults with heart failure: a pilot study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s12877-025-05698-y
Celalettin Küçük, Serdar Özkök, Gülistan Bahat, Ekrem Bilal Karaayvaz, Mustafa Altınkaynak, Alpay Medetalibeyoğlu, Mehmet Akif Karan
{"title":"The simpler modified fried frailty scale predicts 2-year mortality in older adults with heart failure: a pilot study.","authors":"Celalettin Küçük, Serdar Özkök, Gülistan Bahat, Ekrem Bilal Karaayvaz, Mustafa Altınkaynak, Alpay Medetalibeyoğlu, Mehmet Akif Karan","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05698-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Simpler Modified Fried Frailty Scale (SMFFS) has recently been developed from the original Fried scale to ease its use in clinical practice, by transforming the items requiring measurements into the self-reported inquiries. Its predictive validity needs to be clarified, especially in populations with a high prevalence of frailty, such as patients with heart failure (HF). Primary aim of this study is to find out the prevalence of frailty in older patients with HF by using SMFFS and show its concordance with other frailty assessment tools. Secondary aim is to reveal whether SMFFS is useful to predict mortality in follow-up.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This is a prospective, follow-up study including older adults (≥ 65 years) with HF. SMFFS was used to assess frailty phenotype and presence of ≥ 3 items was accepted as frailty. FRAIL scale, the Study of Osteoporosis Fractures (SOF) index, and Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) were alternatively used to study the correlation of SMFFS with different scales. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify whether SMFFS-defined frailty could predict mortality in follow-up, with adjusting for a list of clinical characteristics and geriatric syndromes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 101 patients with HF, 44 (42.8%) were female. Mean age was 75.8 ± 7.6 and frailty prevalence was 63.4% according to SMFFS. SMFFS showed a strong correlation with the other frailty scales. In a median follow-up of 759 days, cardiomegaly, increased pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and frailty defined by SMFFS were the only predictors of mortality in older adults with HF after adjustments for age, falls in the previous year, undernutrition, probable sarcopenia, functional impairments, and quality of life [HR (95% CI) were 3.88 (1.05-14.3), 1.05 (1.01-1.09), and 10.96 (1.07-112.05) (p = 0.027); for older age, PAP, and frailty, respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As a self-reported screening tool, SMFFS was independently associated with mortality in a median follow-up of two years. Frailty assessment recommended by the guidelines for risk stratification in patients with HF seems to be more effectively integrated into routine HF practice with the use of the easy and practical SMFFS. Further large scale studies are needed to support the predictive validity of SMFFS in older patients with HF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05698-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Simpler Modified Fried Frailty Scale (SMFFS) has recently been developed from the original Fried scale to ease its use in clinical practice, by transforming the items requiring measurements into the self-reported inquiries. Its predictive validity needs to be clarified, especially in populations with a high prevalence of frailty, such as patients with heart failure (HF). Primary aim of this study is to find out the prevalence of frailty in older patients with HF by using SMFFS and show its concordance with other frailty assessment tools. Secondary aim is to reveal whether SMFFS is useful to predict mortality in follow-up.

Method: This is a prospective, follow-up study including older adults (≥ 65 years) with HF. SMFFS was used to assess frailty phenotype and presence of ≥ 3 items was accepted as frailty. FRAIL scale, the Study of Osteoporosis Fractures (SOF) index, and Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS) were alternatively used to study the correlation of SMFFS with different scales. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify whether SMFFS-defined frailty could predict mortality in follow-up, with adjusting for a list of clinical characteristics and geriatric syndromes.

Findings: Among 101 patients with HF, 44 (42.8%) were female. Mean age was 75.8 ± 7.6 and frailty prevalence was 63.4% according to SMFFS. SMFFS showed a strong correlation with the other frailty scales. In a median follow-up of 759 days, cardiomegaly, increased pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and frailty defined by SMFFS were the only predictors of mortality in older adults with HF after adjustments for age, falls in the previous year, undernutrition, probable sarcopenia, functional impairments, and quality of life [HR (95% CI) were 3.88 (1.05-14.3), 1.05 (1.01-1.09), and 10.96 (1.07-112.05) (p = 0.027); for older age, PAP, and frailty, respectively].

Conclusions: As a self-reported screening tool, SMFFS was independently associated with mortality in a median follow-up of two years. Frailty assessment recommended by the guidelines for risk stratification in patients with HF seems to be more effectively integrated into routine HF practice with the use of the easy and practical SMFFS. Further large scale studies are needed to support the predictive validity of SMFFS in older patients with HF.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项初步研究表明,更简单的修正fried衰弱量表可以预测老年心力衰竭患者的2年死亡率。
目的:简易修正Fried虚弱量表(simple Modified Fried虚弱量表,SMFFS)是在原Fried虚弱量表的基础上发展而来,将需要测量的项目转化为自我报告的问询,以方便其在临床实践中的使用。其预测有效性需要澄清,特别是在脆弱患病率高的人群中,如心力衰竭(HF)患者。本研究的主要目的是通过SMFFS发现老年心衰患者的虚弱患病率,并显示其与其他虚弱评估工具的一致性。次要目的是揭示SMFFS是否有助于预测随访期间的死亡率。方法:这是一项前瞻性随访研究,纳入老年HF患者(≥65岁)。SMFFS用于评估脆弱表型,存在≥3项被接受为脆弱。采用脆性量表(fragile scale)、Study of Osteoporosis Fractures (SOF)指数和Edmonton脆性量表(EFS)交替进行SMFFS与不同量表的相关性研究。采用cox -回归分析确定smffs定义的虚弱是否可以预测随访中的死亡率,并对一系列临床特征和老年综合征进行调整。结果:101例HF患者中,女性44例(42.8%)。SMFFS的平均年龄为75.8±7.6岁,虚弱患病率为63.4%。SMFFS与其他脆弱性量表有很强的相关性。在中位759天的随访中,经年龄、前一年跌倒、营养不良、可能的肌肉减少症、功能障碍和生活质量调整后,SMFFS定义的心脏肥大、肺动脉压升高(PAP)和虚弱是老年HF患者死亡率的唯一预测因素[HR (95% CI)分别为3.88(1.05-14.3)、1.05(1.01-1.09)和10.96 (1.07-112.05)(p = 0.027);对于老年人,PAP和虚弱分别]。结论:作为一种自我报告的筛查工具,SMFFS与中位随访两年的死亡率独立相关。通过使用简单实用的SMFFS,心衰患者风险分层指南推荐的衰弱评估似乎更有效地融入了心衰的常规实践。需要进一步的大规模研究来支持SMFFS对老年心衰患者的预测有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of hidden blood loss after intramedullary nail fixation of femoral shaft fractures in elderly patients: development and validation of a clinical nomogram based on Gamma regression. Depression and quality of life (QoL) among older adults in Sudurpashchim Province, Nepal: findings from a cross-sectional community survey. Factors associated with caregiving burden of family caregivers of older adults with disability, Kathmandu, Nepal. Fear of falling risk after hip surgery in older adults: an updated sex-specific systematic review with GRADE and PAF assessment. Environmental quality, functional control, and social design as determinants of perceived comfort and psychological well-being among older residents in Chinese continuing care retirement communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1