The proof is in the pudding: patient engagement in studying cannabidiol in mild cognitive impairment.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1186/s12906-025-04753-w
Antonia Keck, Julia-Sophia Scheuermann, Petra Scheerbaum, Elmar Graessel, Kirsten R Müller-Vahl
{"title":"The proof is in the pudding: patient engagement in studying cannabidiol in mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Antonia Keck, Julia-Sophia Scheuermann, Petra Scheerbaum, Elmar Graessel, Kirsten R Müller-Vahl","doi":"10.1186/s12906-025-04753-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient engagement (PE) in clinical trials has gained importance yet remains uncommon, particularly in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a critical precursor to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cannabidiol (CBD) shows potential in slowing MCI progression due to its neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In CBD research, PE is underutilized too. To design a study on CBD for MCI, we administered an online survey to individuals with MCI to better understand their preferences for trial setup and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We asked 209 individuals with MCI to complete an online survey assessing (i) willingness to participate in a trial using CBD; (ii) importance of improvements in various domains; (iii) acceptance of adverse events (AEs); (iv) reasons for AE-related dropout; (v) willingness to undergo blood sampling and lumbar puncture to assess AD pathology; and (vi) willingness to participate in a trial with a 50% chance of receiving a placebo. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>N = 118 agreed to participate and N = 88 completed the survey. Participants prioritized improvement in cognitive abilities (87.5%), followed by quality of life (63.6%), daily activities (55.7%), sleep (55.7%), pain (52.3%), mood (52.3%), behavior (48.9%), and anxiety (43.2%). Headache (55.7%) was the least accepted AE followed by nausea (46.6%), fatigue (35.2%), and diarrhea (35.2%). Persistent diarrhea (90.9%) and severe fatigue (84.1%) were the main reasons for potential dropout. While most would undergo blood sampling (67.0%), only a minority (21.6%) would accept lumbar puncture. One-third were ready to participate (34.1%), while 54.5% were interested pending details. Among those in favor of participation, 71.6% would participate even with a 50% chance of placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study identified cognitive improvement as highly relevant for patients, indicating cognitive assessment tools as primary endpoints in MCI research. Given concerns about AEs, dose titration should be carefully considered to enhance acceptance and prevent AEs. Blood sampling seems well-accepted for AD biomarker assessment. Despite potential AEs, participation in a trial using CBD for MCI is seen as attractive, even under placebo-controlled conditions. This cross-sectional study emphasizes the importance of patient engagement in designing high-quality trials for using CBD to treat MCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9128,"journal":{"name":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","volume":"25 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-025-04753-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement (PE) in clinical trials has gained importance yet remains uncommon, particularly in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a critical precursor to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Cannabidiol (CBD) shows potential in slowing MCI progression due to its neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties. In CBD research, PE is underutilized too. To design a study on CBD for MCI, we administered an online survey to individuals with MCI to better understand their preferences for trial setup and outcomes.

Methods: We asked 209 individuals with MCI to complete an online survey assessing (i) willingness to participate in a trial using CBD; (ii) importance of improvements in various domains; (iii) acceptance of adverse events (AEs); (iv) reasons for AE-related dropout; (v) willingness to undergo blood sampling and lumbar puncture to assess AD pathology; and (vi) willingness to participate in a trial with a 50% chance of receiving a placebo. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results: N = 118 agreed to participate and N = 88 completed the survey. Participants prioritized improvement in cognitive abilities (87.5%), followed by quality of life (63.6%), daily activities (55.7%), sleep (55.7%), pain (52.3%), mood (52.3%), behavior (48.9%), and anxiety (43.2%). Headache (55.7%) was the least accepted AE followed by nausea (46.6%), fatigue (35.2%), and diarrhea (35.2%). Persistent diarrhea (90.9%) and severe fatigue (84.1%) were the main reasons for potential dropout. While most would undergo blood sampling (67.0%), only a minority (21.6%) would accept lumbar puncture. One-third were ready to participate (34.1%), while 54.5% were interested pending details. Among those in favor of participation, 71.6% would participate even with a 50% chance of placebo.

Conclusions: Our study identified cognitive improvement as highly relevant for patients, indicating cognitive assessment tools as primary endpoints in MCI research. Given concerns about AEs, dose titration should be carefully considered to enhance acceptance and prevent AEs. Blood sampling seems well-accepted for AD biomarker assessment. Despite potential AEs, participation in a trial using CBD for MCI is seen as attractive, even under placebo-controlled conditions. This cross-sectional study emphasizes the importance of patient engagement in designing high-quality trials for using CBD to treat MCI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
证据就在布丁里:患者参与研究大麻二酚对轻度认知障碍的影响。
背景:临床试验中的患者参与(PE)已经变得越来越重要,但仍然不常见,特别是在轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者中,轻度认知障碍是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的重要前兆。由于其神经保护和抗炎特性,大麻二酚(CBD)显示出减缓MCI进展的潜力。在CBD研究中,PE也未得到充分利用。为了设计一项CBD治疗轻度认知损伤的研究,我们对轻度认知损伤患者进行了一项在线调查,以更好地了解他们对试验设置和结果的偏好。方法:我们要求209名MCI患者完成一项在线调查,评估:(1)参与使用CBD试验的意愿;(ii)各领域改进的重要性;(iii)接受不良事件(ae);(四)ae相关辍学原因;(v)愿意接受采血和腰椎穿刺来评估AD病理;(vi)愿意参加有50%机会接受安慰剂的试验。资料用描述性统计进行分析。结果:同意参与调查的有118人,完成调查的有88人。参与者优先考虑的是认知能力的改善(87.5%),其次是生活质量(63.6%)、日常活动(55.7%)、睡眠(55.7%)、疼痛(52.3%)、情绪(52.3%)、行为(48.9%)和焦虑(43.2%)。头痛(55.7%)是最不被接受的AE,其次是恶心(46.6%)、疲劳(35.2%)和腹泻(35.2%)。持续性腹泻(90.9%)和严重疲劳(84.1%)是潜在辍学的主要原因。虽然大多数人(67.0%)会接受采血,但只有少数人(21.6%)会接受腰椎穿刺。三分之一(34.1%)的受访者已准备参与,而54.5%的受访者对待定的细节感兴趣。在那些赞成参与的人中,即使有50%的机会服用安慰剂,71.6%的人也会参与。结论:我们的研究发现认知改善与患者高度相关,表明认知评估工具是MCI研究的主要终点。考虑到对不良反应的担忧,应仔细考虑剂量滴定以提高接受度并预防不良反应。血液取样似乎被广泛接受用于阿尔茨海默病生物标志物评估。尽管有潜在的不良反应,参与使用CBD治疗轻度认知损伤的试验被认为是有吸引力的,即使是在安慰剂控制的条件下。这项横断面研究强调了患者参与设计使用CBD治疗轻度认知损伤的高质量试验的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
300
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Effects of specific extensor exercise on balance control in patients with neck pain; a randomized controlled trial. Longer-term chiropractic care outcomes for US active-duty military personnel with low back pain: secondary analysis of a pragmatic clinical trial. Post-marketing surveillance of cordyceps products online: identifying falsified products and regulatory challenges. Tridax procumbens promotes apoptosis and suppresses markers of proliferation, growth, and metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Hepatotoxicity prediction for traditional Chinese medicine: a two-step in silico framework integrating network and machine learning approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1