From water to land-Usage of Generalized Unified Threshold models of Survival (GUTS) in an above-ground terrestrial context exemplified by honeybee survival data.

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/etojnl/vgae058
Leonhard Urs Bürger, Andreas Focks
{"title":"From water to land-Usage of Generalized Unified Threshold models of Survival (GUTS) in an above-ground terrestrial context exemplified by honeybee survival data.","authors":"Leonhard Urs Bürger, Andreas Focks","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgae058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In regulatory aquatic risk assessment, toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) methods, such as the generalized unified threshold model of survival (GUTS), are already established and considered ready for use, whereas TKTD methods for aboveground terrestrial species, like arthropods, are less developed and currently not intended for risk assessment. This could be due to the fact that exposure in aboveground terrestrial systems is more event-based (feeding, contact, overspray, etc.), whereas exposure in aquatic systems is simply related to substance concentrations in the surrounding water. To provide a generic TKTD framework for terrestrial invertebrates, we propose a new GUTS variant that includes an intermediate buffer between the external exposure and inside of the organism. This buffer can be interpreted as residues on the exoskeleton or in the stomach, depending on the uptake route. Such an uptake behavior is mechanistically reasonable and observable in laboratory experiments. This GUTS variant, BufferGUTS, is particularly suitable for discrete or discretized exposure scenarios. Testing our model on honeybee datasets for 13 pesticides reveals a similar or better reproduction of survival curves than existing models (GUTS-RED and BeeGUTS) while keeping the number of parameters the same and making no substance or species-specific assumptions. The proposed new BufferGUTS approach can prospectively be used to derive TKTD parameters for a variety of terrestrial arthropod species. A standardized model definition for terrestrial species will facilitate the comparison and extrapolation of parameters between species and the applicability for terrestrial risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"589-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In regulatory aquatic risk assessment, toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) methods, such as the generalized unified threshold model of survival (GUTS), are already established and considered ready for use, whereas TKTD methods for aboveground terrestrial species, like arthropods, are less developed and currently not intended for risk assessment. This could be due to the fact that exposure in aboveground terrestrial systems is more event-based (feeding, contact, overspray, etc.), whereas exposure in aquatic systems is simply related to substance concentrations in the surrounding water. To provide a generic TKTD framework for terrestrial invertebrates, we propose a new GUTS variant that includes an intermediate buffer between the external exposure and inside of the organism. This buffer can be interpreted as residues on the exoskeleton or in the stomach, depending on the uptake route. Such an uptake behavior is mechanistically reasonable and observable in laboratory experiments. This GUTS variant, BufferGUTS, is particularly suitable for discrete or discretized exposure scenarios. Testing our model on honeybee datasets for 13 pesticides reveals a similar or better reproduction of survival curves than existing models (GUTS-RED and BeeGUTS) while keeping the number of parameters the same and making no substance or species-specific assumptions. The proposed new BufferGUTS approach can prospectively be used to derive TKTD parameters for a variety of terrestrial arthropod species. A standardized model definition for terrestrial species will facilitate the comparison and extrapolation of parameters between species and the applicability for terrestrial risk assessments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以蜜蜂生存数据为例的陆地环境下从水到土地的广义统一阈值生存模型(GUTS)
在监管性水生风险评估中,毒性动力学-毒性动力学(TKTD)方法,如生存广义统一阈值模型(GUTS),已经建立并被认为可以使用,而用于地上陆生物种(如节肢动物)的TKTD方法则欠发达,目前尚未用于风险评估。这可能是由于地面系统中的暴露更多是基于事件(进食、接触、过度喷洒等),而水生系统中的暴露仅与周围水中的物质浓度有关。为了为陆生无脊椎动物提供一个通用的TKTD框架,我们提出了一种新的GUTS变体,其中包括外部暴露和生物体内部之间的中间缓冲。根据摄取途径的不同,这种缓冲液可以被解释为外骨骼或胃中的残留物。这种摄取行为在机械上是合理的,并且在实验室实验中是可以观察到的。这个GUTS变体BufferGUTS特别适用于离散或离散暴露场景。在13种农药的蜜蜂数据集上测试我们的模型显示,在保持参数数量相同且不做物质或物种特定假设的情况下,与现有模型(GUTS-RED和BeeGUTS)相比,我们的模型具有相似或更好的生存曲线再现。所提出的新的BufferGUTS方法可用于推导各种陆生节肢动物物种的TKTD参数。陆生物种的标准化模式定义将有助于物种之间参数的比较和外推,并有助于陆地风险评估的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...] Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.
期刊最新文献
Rose danio (Danio roseus): A Native Mekong Basin Alternative to Zebrafish for Acute, Developmental, and Neurobehavioral Toxicity Testing. AI-Assisted Tissue Classification in Chironomus riparius: A Potential Tool for Ecotoxicological Studies. Cadmium induces toxicological responses in two bioindicator species of distinct trophic levels during early developmental stages? Assays on environmental concentrations and considerations on potential future increases in the environment. Innovative method to measure response of cyanobacteria to copper exposure: implications for harmful algal research and management. A method for embryo-larval development toxicity testing on an endemic and commercially important mussel, Perna canaliculus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1