Linear incrementality in focus and accentuation processing during sentence production: evidence from eye movements.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Human Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1523629
Zhenghua Zhang, Qingfang Zhang
{"title":"Linear incrementality in focus and accentuation processing during sentence production: evidence from eye movements.","authors":"Zhenghua Zhang, Qingfang Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2024.1523629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While considerable research in language production has focused on incremental processing during conceptual and grammatical encoding, prosodic encoding remains less investigated. This study examines whether focus and accentuation processing in speech production follows linear or hierarchical incrementality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed visual world eye-tracking to investigate how focus and accentuation are processed during sentence production. Participants were asked to complete a scenario description task where they were prompted to use a predetermined sentence structure to accurately convey the scenario, thereby spontaneously accentuate the corresponding entity. We manipulated the positions of focus with accentuation (initial vs. medial) by changing the scenarios. The initial and medial positions correspond to the first and second nouns in sentences like \"N1 is above N2, not N3.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings revealed that speech latencies were significantly shorter in the sentences with initial focus accentuation than those with medial focus accentuation. Furthermore, eye-tracking data demonstrated that speakers quickly displayed a preference for fixating on initial information after scenarios onset. Crucially, the time-course analysis revealed that the onset of the initial focus accentuation effect (around 460 ms) preceded that of the medial focus accentuation effect (around 920 ms).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These results support that focus and accentuation processing during speech production prior to articulation follows linear incrementality rather than hierarchical incrementality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"18 ","pages":"1523629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1523629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While considerable research in language production has focused on incremental processing during conceptual and grammatical encoding, prosodic encoding remains less investigated. This study examines whether focus and accentuation processing in speech production follows linear or hierarchical incrementality.

Methods: We employed visual world eye-tracking to investigate how focus and accentuation are processed during sentence production. Participants were asked to complete a scenario description task where they were prompted to use a predetermined sentence structure to accurately convey the scenario, thereby spontaneously accentuate the corresponding entity. We manipulated the positions of focus with accentuation (initial vs. medial) by changing the scenarios. The initial and medial positions correspond to the first and second nouns in sentences like "N1 is above N2, not N3."

Results: Our findings revealed that speech latencies were significantly shorter in the sentences with initial focus accentuation than those with medial focus accentuation. Furthermore, eye-tracking data demonstrated that speakers quickly displayed a preference for fixating on initial information after scenarios onset. Crucially, the time-course analysis revealed that the onset of the initial focus accentuation effect (around 460 ms) preceded that of the medial focus accentuation effect (around 920 ms).

Discussion: These results support that focus and accentuation processing during speech production prior to articulation follows linear incrementality rather than hierarchical incrementality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
句子生成过程中焦点和重音加工的线性递增:来自眼动的证据。
导言:虽然语言产生的大量研究集中在概念和语法编码过程中的增量加工,但韵律编码的研究仍然较少。本研究探讨了语音产生中的焦点和重音处理是否遵循线性递增或分层递增。方法:采用视觉世界眼动法研究句子生成过程中焦点和重音的加工过程。参与者被要求完成一个场景描述任务,在这个任务中,他们被要求使用预先确定的句子结构来准确地传达场景,从而自然而然地强调相应的实体。我们通过改变场景来操纵焦点的位置(初始与中间)。起始和中间位置对应于句子中的第一和第二名词,如“N1高于N2,而不是N3”。结果:我们的研究结果表明,初始焦点重音句子的言语潜伏期明显短于中间焦点重音句子。此外,眼动追踪数据表明,说话者在场景开始后很快就会倾向于关注初始信息。至关重要的是,时间过程分析显示,初始焦点强化效应(约460毫秒)的出现早于中间焦点强化效应(约920毫秒)。讨论:这些结果支持在发音之前的语音生成过程中的焦点和重音处理遵循线性递增而不是分层递增。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
830
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.
期刊最新文献
Trait self-responsibility modulates neural responses to near-miss loss: an ERP study. Gamma tACS over the prefrontal and parietal cortices enhances episodic memory performance. Relearning the epistemology, history, and future of neuropsychiatry. Complex motor imagery in elite female ice hockey players: a cortical arena of imagination revealed by magnetoencephalography. EEG alpha reactivity in cognitive aging and dementia: clinical implications and cholinergic mechanisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1