Victor Franchi, Claire Triffault-Fillit, Sophie Jarraud, Jean-Yves Mabrut, Clément Javaux, Olivier Monneuse, Anne Conrad, Tristan Ferry, Maud Robert, Florence Ader, Guillaume Passot, Florent Valour
{"title":"Management and outcome of mesh infection after abdominal wall reconstruction in a tertiary care center.","authors":"Victor Franchi, Claire Triffault-Fillit, Sophie Jarraud, Jean-Yves Mabrut, Clément Javaux, Olivier Monneuse, Anne Conrad, Tristan Ferry, Maud Robert, Florence Ader, Guillaume Passot, Florent Valour","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03265-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Abdominal wall reconstruction is a common surgical procedure, with a post-operative risk of mesh-associated infection of which management is poorly known. This study aims to comprehensively analyze clinical and microbiological aspects of mesh infection, treatment modalities, and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with abdominal mesh infection were included in a retrospective observational cohort (2010-2023). Patients characteristics and management were described, and determinants for failure were assessed by logistic regression and treatment failure-free survival curve analysis (Kaplan-Meier).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and nine patients (median age, 62 [IQR, 55-71] years) presented a mesh infection occurring within 15 (IQR, 7-31) days after surgery, mainly as an abdominal wall or deep abscess (n=189, 90.4%). Infection was polymicrobial in 89/166 (79.4%) cases, S. aureus (n=60, 36.1%), Enterobacteriaceae (n=60, 36.1%) and anaerobes (n=40, 24.1%) being the most prevalent pathogens. Surgery was performed in 130 (62.2%) patients, associated with a 13.5 (IQR, 8-21) day course of antimicrobial therapy in 172/207 (83.1%) cases. Sixty-three (30.1%) treatment failures occurred, associated with previous multiple abdominal surgeries (OR, 3.305; 95%CI, 1.297-8.425), complete mesh removal (OR, 0.145; 95%CI, 0.063-0.335) and antimicrobial therapy (OR, 0.328; 95%CI, 0.136-0.787). The higher failure rate of conservative strategies was associated with symptom duration >1 month (OR, 3.378; 95%CI, 1.089-4.005) and retromuscular mesh position (OR, 0.444; 95%CI, 0.199-0.992).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mesh infection is associated with high treatment failure rates. Complete mesh removal coupled with targeted antibiotic therapy is associated with better outcomes. Conservative treatment strategies must rely on careful patient selection based on symptom duration and mesh placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03265-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Abdominal wall reconstruction is a common surgical procedure, with a post-operative risk of mesh-associated infection of which management is poorly known. This study aims to comprehensively analyze clinical and microbiological aspects of mesh infection, treatment modalities, and associated outcomes.
Methods: Patients with abdominal mesh infection were included in a retrospective observational cohort (2010-2023). Patients characteristics and management were described, and determinants for failure were assessed by logistic regression and treatment failure-free survival curve analysis (Kaplan-Meier).
Results: Two hundred and nine patients (median age, 62 [IQR, 55-71] years) presented a mesh infection occurring within 15 (IQR, 7-31) days after surgery, mainly as an abdominal wall or deep abscess (n=189, 90.4%). Infection was polymicrobial in 89/166 (79.4%) cases, S. aureus (n=60, 36.1%), Enterobacteriaceae (n=60, 36.1%) and anaerobes (n=40, 24.1%) being the most prevalent pathogens. Surgery was performed in 130 (62.2%) patients, associated with a 13.5 (IQR, 8-21) day course of antimicrobial therapy in 172/207 (83.1%) cases. Sixty-three (30.1%) treatment failures occurred, associated with previous multiple abdominal surgeries (OR, 3.305; 95%CI, 1.297-8.425), complete mesh removal (OR, 0.145; 95%CI, 0.063-0.335) and antimicrobial therapy (OR, 0.328; 95%CI, 0.136-0.787). The higher failure rate of conservative strategies was associated with symptom duration >1 month (OR, 3.378; 95%CI, 1.089-4.005) and retromuscular mesh position (OR, 0.444; 95%CI, 0.199-0.992).
Conclusion: Mesh infection is associated with high treatment failure rates. Complete mesh removal coupled with targeted antibiotic therapy is associated with better outcomes. Conservative treatment strategies must rely on careful patient selection based on symptom duration and mesh placement.
期刊介绍:
Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery.
Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.