{"title":"It's about time: moving away from statistical analysis of ecotoxicity data.","authors":"Tjalling Jager","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjaf009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Environmental risk assessment of chemicals (ERA) relies on single-species laboratory testing to establish the toxic properties of a compound. However, ERA is not concerned with toxicity under laboratory conditions: it needs to assess the impacts of the compound in the real world. Data-driven statistical analyses (e.g., hypothesis testing and interpolation) are the common approaches for analysing toxicity data, but such approaches are the wrong tool for the job at hand. ERA does not need a statistical description of the effects in the toxicity test (at the end of the standardised test duration), it needs to extrapolate from the laboratory test to longer and time-varying exposure. Such extrapolation requires mechanistic process models, providing a simplified representation of the mechanisms underlying toxicity. Any useful model for the toxicity process should explicitly consider both dose (e.g., exposure concentration) and time. In the history of effects analysis for ERA, the factor of time does not get as much attention as the dose, hence common use of the term 'dose-response analysis'. However, this is a historical oversight: time is a crucial factor for understanding toxicity and thereby essential for meaningful extrapolation from laboratory to field. Mechanistic models for ecotoxicity, considering both dose and time, have been around for quite some time and are classified as toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) models. TKTD models are starting to find their way into pesticide ERA in Europe, next to the classical statistical approaches. In this opinion paper, I argue that it is about time to leave statistical analysis of toxicity data behind us. Statistics remains important for ERA's effects assessment, but its role lies in the definition of appropriate 'error models', explaining the deviations between model output and observations, which is essential for parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and error propagation. The 'process model', essential for extrapolation, firmly belongs to TKTD modelling.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Environmental risk assessment of chemicals (ERA) relies on single-species laboratory testing to establish the toxic properties of a compound. However, ERA is not concerned with toxicity under laboratory conditions: it needs to assess the impacts of the compound in the real world. Data-driven statistical analyses (e.g., hypothesis testing and interpolation) are the common approaches for analysing toxicity data, but such approaches are the wrong tool for the job at hand. ERA does not need a statistical description of the effects in the toxicity test (at the end of the standardised test duration), it needs to extrapolate from the laboratory test to longer and time-varying exposure. Such extrapolation requires mechanistic process models, providing a simplified representation of the mechanisms underlying toxicity. Any useful model for the toxicity process should explicitly consider both dose (e.g., exposure concentration) and time. In the history of effects analysis for ERA, the factor of time does not get as much attention as the dose, hence common use of the term 'dose-response analysis'. However, this is a historical oversight: time is a crucial factor for understanding toxicity and thereby essential for meaningful extrapolation from laboratory to field. Mechanistic models for ecotoxicity, considering both dose and time, have been around for quite some time and are classified as toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) models. TKTD models are starting to find their way into pesticide ERA in Europe, next to the classical statistical approaches. In this opinion paper, I argue that it is about time to leave statistical analysis of toxicity data behind us. Statistics remains important for ERA's effects assessment, but its role lies in the definition of appropriate 'error models', explaining the deviations between model output and observations, which is essential for parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and error propagation. The 'process model', essential for extrapolation, firmly belongs to TKTD modelling.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.