Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Disease

IF 11.4 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Cardiovascular interventions Pub Date : 2025-03-10 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.052
Seung-Jun Lee MD , Tae-Hoon Kim MD , Jae-Hwan Lee MD , Chul-Min Ahn MD , Sang-Hyup Lee MD , Yong-Joon Lee MD , Byeong-Keuk Kim MD , Myeong-Ki Hong MD , Yangsoo Jang MD , Ha-Wook Park MD , Ji Yong Jang MD , Jae-Hyeong Park MD , Su Hong Kim MD , Eui Im MD , Sang-ho Park MD , Donghoon Choi MD , Young-Guk Ko MD , IVUS-DCB Investigators
{"title":"Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Disease","authors":"Seung-Jun Lee MD ,&nbsp;Tae-Hoon Kim MD ,&nbsp;Jae-Hwan Lee MD ,&nbsp;Chul-Min Ahn MD ,&nbsp;Sang-Hyup Lee MD ,&nbsp;Yong-Joon Lee MD ,&nbsp;Byeong-Keuk Kim MD ,&nbsp;Myeong-Ki Hong MD ,&nbsp;Yangsoo Jang MD ,&nbsp;Ha-Wook Park MD ,&nbsp;Ji Yong Jang MD ,&nbsp;Jae-Hyeong Park MD ,&nbsp;Su Hong Kim MD ,&nbsp;Eui Im MD ,&nbsp;Sang-ho Park MD ,&nbsp;Donghoon Choi MD ,&nbsp;Young-Guk Ko MD ,&nbsp;IVUS-DCB Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance has been shown to yield favorable outcomes for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, the specific benefits of IVUS for treatment of complex FPA lesions remain uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In this study, the authors compared the clinical impact of IVUS-guided vs angiography-guided DCB angioplasty in patients with complex or noncomplex FPA lesions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was a prespecified, primary subgroup analysis of the randomized IVUS-DCB trial. Patients with FPA undergoing DCB angioplasty were randomized to receive the procedure under IVUS or angiography guidance. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency; secondary endpoints included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), sustained clinical improvement, and hemodynamic improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 237 patients enrolled, 158 had complex FPA (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II [TASC II] type C/D), and 79 had noncomplex FPA (TASC II type A/B). In complex FPA, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly higher rates of primary patency (82.1% vs 60.3%; HR for loss of primary patency: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.70; <em>P</em> = 0.002), freedom from CD-TLR (90.0% vs 76.9%; HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.75; <em>P</em> = 0.01), and sustained clinical and hemodynamic improvement relative to angiography guidance. There was no significant difference in primary patency (87.5% vs 88.2%; HR: 1.84; 95% CI: 0.39-8.60; <em>P</em> = 0.44) or occurrence secondary endpoints between the IVUS-guidance and angiography-guidance groups for patients with noncomplex FPA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In endovascular treatment of FPA using DCB, IVUS guidance was significantly associated with improved 12-month clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with complex FPA lesions. (Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease [IVUS-DCB] trial; <span><span>NCT03517904</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14688,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":"18 5","pages":"Pages 558-569"},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879824016121","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance has been shown to yield favorable outcomes for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, the specific benefits of IVUS for treatment of complex FPA lesions remain uncertain.

Objectives

In this study, the authors compared the clinical impact of IVUS-guided vs angiography-guided DCB angioplasty in patients with complex or noncomplex FPA lesions.

Methods

This study was a prespecified, primary subgroup analysis of the randomized IVUS-DCB trial. Patients with FPA undergoing DCB angioplasty were randomized to receive the procedure under IVUS or angiography guidance. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency; secondary endpoints included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), sustained clinical improvement, and hemodynamic improvement.

Results

Among the 237 patients enrolled, 158 had complex FPA (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II [TASC II] type C/D), and 79 had noncomplex FPA (TASC II type A/B). In complex FPA, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly higher rates of primary patency (82.1% vs 60.3%; HR for loss of primary patency: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.70; P = 0.002), freedom from CD-TLR (90.0% vs 76.9%; HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.75; P = 0.01), and sustained clinical and hemodynamic improvement relative to angiography guidance. There was no significant difference in primary patency (87.5% vs 88.2%; HR: 1.84; 95% CI: 0.39-8.60; P = 0.44) or occurrence secondary endpoints between the IVUS-guidance and angiography-guidance groups for patients with noncomplex FPA.

Conclusions

In endovascular treatment of FPA using DCB, IVUS guidance was significantly associated with improved 12-month clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with complex FPA lesions. (Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease [IVUS-DCB] trial; NCT03517904)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下与血管造影引导下药物包覆球囊成形术治疗复杂股腘动脉疾病
背景:血管内超声(IVUS)引导已被证明在药物包被球囊(DCB)血管成形术治疗股腘动脉(FPA)疾病的血管内治疗中具有良好的效果。然而,IVUS治疗复杂FPA病变的具体益处仍不确定。目的:在这项研究中,作者比较了ivus引导与血管造影引导下的DCB血管成形术对复杂或非复杂FPA病变患者的临床影响。方法:本研究是随机IVUS-DCB试验的预先指定的主要亚组分析。接受DCB血管成形术的FPA患者在IVUS或血管造影指导下随机接受手术。主要终点为12个月原发性通畅;次要终点包括临床驱动的靶病变血运重建术(CD-TLR)、持续的临床改善和血流动力学改善。结果:237例入组患者中,158例为复杂FPA (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II [TASC II] C/D型),79例为非复杂FPA (TASC II A/B型)。在复杂的FPA中,IVUS指导与更高的原发性通畅率相关(82.1% vs 60.3%;原发性通畅丧失的HR: 0.34;95% ci: 0.16-0.70;P = 0.002), CD-TLR自由度(90.0% vs 76.9%;人力资源:0.31;95% ci: 0.13-0.75;P = 0.01),相对于血管造影指导,临床和血流动力学持续改善。原发性通畅无显著差异(87.5% vs 88.2%;人力资源:1.84;95% ci: 0.39-8.60;P = 0.44)或ivus指导组和血管造影指导组对非复杂性FPA患者发生次要终点的差异。结论:在血管内使用DCB治疗FPA时,IVUS引导与改善12个月的临床结果显著相关,特别是对于复杂FPA病变的患者。超声引导下药物包膜球囊成形术治疗股腘动脉病变[IVUS-DCB]试验;NCT03517904)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.80%
发文量
756
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions is a specialist journal launched by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It covers the entire field of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including cardiac, peripheral, and cerebrovascular interventions. The journal publishes studies that will impact the practice of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including clinical trials, experimental studies, and in-depth discussions by respected experts. To enhance visual understanding, the journal is published both in print and electronically, utilizing the latest technologies.
期刊最新文献
REPLY Editorial Board Core Laboratory Comparison of Angiography-Derived Indexes of Microvascular Resistance vs Pressure-Wire IMR and Absolute Resistance Percutaneous Device Closure for Saccular Superior Vena Cava Aneurysm Hemodynamic Instability Following Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1