Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS JACC. Cardiovascular interventions Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.052
Seung-Jun Lee, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jae-Hwan Lee, Chul-Min Ahn, Sang-Hyup Lee, Yong-Joon Lee, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Myeong-Ki Hong, Yangsoo Jang, Ha-Wook Park, Ji Yong Jang, Jae-Hyeong Park, Su Hong Kim, Eui Im, Sang-Ho Park, Donghoon Choi, Young-Guk Ko
{"title":"Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Disease.","authors":"Seung-Jun Lee, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jae-Hwan Lee, Chul-Min Ahn, Sang-Hyup Lee, Yong-Joon Lee, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Myeong-Ki Hong, Yangsoo Jang, Ha-Wook Park, Ji Yong Jang, Jae-Hyeong Park, Su Hong Kim, Eui Im, Sang-Ho Park, Donghoon Choi, Young-Guk Ko","doi":"10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance has been shown to yield favorable outcomes for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, the specific benefits of IVUS for treatment of complex FPA lesions remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this study, the authors compared the clinical impact of IVUS-guided vs angiography-guided DCB angioplasty in patients with complex or noncomplex FPA lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a prespecified, primary subgroup analysis of the randomized IVUS-DCB trial. Patients with FPA undergoing DCB angioplasty were randomized to receive the procedure under IVUS or angiography guidance. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency; secondary endpoints included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), sustained clinical improvement, and hemodynamic improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 237 patients enrolled, 158 had complex FPA (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II [TASC II] type C/D), and 79 had noncomplex FPA (TASC II type A/B). In complex FPA, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly higher rates of primary patency (82.1% vs 60.3%; HR for loss of primary patency: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.70; P = 0.002), freedom from CD-TLR (90.0% vs 76.9%; HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.75; P = 0.01), and sustained clinical and hemodynamic improvement relative to angiography guidance. There was no significant difference in primary patency (87.5% vs 88.2%; HR: 1.84; 95% CI: 0.39-8.60; P = 0.44) or occurrence secondary endpoints between the IVUS-guidance and angiography-guidance groups for patients with noncomplex FPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In endovascular treatment of FPA using DCB, IVUS guidance was significantly associated with improved 12-month clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with complex FPA lesions.(Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease [IVUS-DCB] trial; NCT03517904).</p>","PeriodicalId":14688,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Cardiovascular interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.052","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance has been shown to yield favorable outcomes for endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal artery (FPA) disease with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. However, the specific benefits of IVUS for treatment of complex FPA lesions remain uncertain.

Objectives: In this study, the authors compared the clinical impact of IVUS-guided vs angiography-guided DCB angioplasty in patients with complex or noncomplex FPA lesions.

Methods: This study was a prespecified, primary subgroup analysis of the randomized IVUS-DCB trial. Patients with FPA undergoing DCB angioplasty were randomized to receive the procedure under IVUS or angiography guidance. The primary endpoint was 12-month primary patency; secondary endpoints included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), sustained clinical improvement, and hemodynamic improvement.

Results: Among the 237 patients enrolled, 158 had complex FPA (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II [TASC II] type C/D), and 79 had noncomplex FPA (TASC II type A/B). In complex FPA, IVUS guidance was associated with significantly higher rates of primary patency (82.1% vs 60.3%; HR for loss of primary patency: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.70; P = 0.002), freedom from CD-TLR (90.0% vs 76.9%; HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.13-0.75; P = 0.01), and sustained clinical and hemodynamic improvement relative to angiography guidance. There was no significant difference in primary patency (87.5% vs 88.2%; HR: 1.84; 95% CI: 0.39-8.60; P = 0.44) or occurrence secondary endpoints between the IVUS-guidance and angiography-guidance groups for patients with noncomplex FPA.

Conclusions: In endovascular treatment of FPA using DCB, IVUS guidance was significantly associated with improved 12-month clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with complex FPA lesions.(Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease [IVUS-DCB] trial; NCT03517904).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.80%
发文量
756
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions is a specialist journal launched by the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It covers the entire field of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including cardiac, peripheral, and cerebrovascular interventions. The journal publishes studies that will impact the practice of interventional cardiovascular medicine, including clinical trials, experimental studies, and in-depth discussions by respected experts. To enhance visual understanding, the journal is published both in print and electronically, utilizing the latest technologies.
期刊最新文献
Optical Coherence Tomography in Motion: Potential Cause for Artifacts. Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided vs Angiography-Guided Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients With Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Disease. Lifetime Management in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Through Patient-Specific Simulations. Napkin-Ring Sign as a Metallic Artifact on MRI: A Signature of Cutting Balloon Blade Dislodgement. A Torn Leaflet: An Unusual Complication of a Degenerated Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prosthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1