Michele Emdin, Alberto Aimo, Yu Fu Ferrari Chen, Marco Merlo, Aldostefano Porcari, Giuseppe Vergaro, Gianfranco Sinagra
{"title":"Cardiac amyloidosis: when to suspect and how to confirm.","authors":"Michele Emdin, Alberto Aimo, Yu Fu Ferrari Chen, Marco Merlo, Aldostefano Porcari, Giuseppe Vergaro, Gianfranco Sinagra","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is challenging because of its phenotypic heterogeneity, multiorgan involvement requiring interaction among experts in different specialties and subspecialties, lack of a single noninvasive diagnostic tool, and still limited awareness in the medical community. Missing or delaying the diagnosis of CA may profoundly impact on patients' outcomes, as potentially life-saving treatments may be omitted or delayed. The suspicion of CA should arise when \"red flags\" for this condition are present, together with increased left ventricular wall thickness. The diagnosis of CA requires amyloid typing and differentiation between the two most common forms, light chain (AL) and either mutated or wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA), which is critical to guide a specific treatment. Scientific societies worldwide focus on the importance of red flags, and on the prompt initiation of the diagnostic process with bone tracer uptake and the search of a monoclonal protein. An extra-cardiac or endomyocardial tissue biopsy is needed when a monoclonal protein has been detected and/or cardiac bone tracer uptake is absent or weak. Finally, all patients diagnosed with ATTR-CA should undergo genetic testing to search for TTR gene mutations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"26 2","pages":"102-105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001695","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is challenging because of its phenotypic heterogeneity, multiorgan involvement requiring interaction among experts in different specialties and subspecialties, lack of a single noninvasive diagnostic tool, and still limited awareness in the medical community. Missing or delaying the diagnosis of CA may profoundly impact on patients' outcomes, as potentially life-saving treatments may be omitted or delayed. The suspicion of CA should arise when "red flags" for this condition are present, together with increased left ventricular wall thickness. The diagnosis of CA requires amyloid typing and differentiation between the two most common forms, light chain (AL) and either mutated or wild-type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA), which is critical to guide a specific treatment. Scientific societies worldwide focus on the importance of red flags, and on the prompt initiation of the diagnostic process with bone tracer uptake and the search of a monoclonal protein. An extra-cardiac or endomyocardial tissue biopsy is needed when a monoclonal protein has been detected and/or cardiac bone tracer uptake is absent or weak. Finally, all patients diagnosed with ATTR-CA should undergo genetic testing to search for TTR gene mutations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine.
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.