Assessing post-COVID-19 functional recovery in healthcare workers: Insights from the 6-minute walking test and DLCO analysis

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection and Public Health Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102664
Salma AlBahrani , Ali AlBarrak , Jaber S. Alqahtani , Nawal AlGubaisi , Hamoud Alkurdi , Dalia Alburaiki , Abdulrahaman AlGhamdi , Mohammed AlOthaiqy , Osama Faqihi , Meshael Musaed Almershad , Fatimah Hassan Hakami , Asmaa AlAbbadi , Mariam Hassan Hakami , Alaa AlMaimouni , Zechariah Jebakumar Arulanantham , Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq
{"title":"Assessing post-COVID-19 functional recovery in healthcare workers: Insights from the 6-minute walking test and DLCO analysis","authors":"Salma AlBahrani ,&nbsp;Ali AlBarrak ,&nbsp;Jaber S. Alqahtani ,&nbsp;Nawal AlGubaisi ,&nbsp;Hamoud Alkurdi ,&nbsp;Dalia Alburaiki ,&nbsp;Abdulrahaman AlGhamdi ,&nbsp;Mohammed AlOthaiqy ,&nbsp;Osama Faqihi ,&nbsp;Meshael Musaed Almershad ,&nbsp;Fatimah Hassan Hakami ,&nbsp;Asmaa AlAbbadi ,&nbsp;Mariam Hassan Hakami ,&nbsp;Alaa AlMaimouni ,&nbsp;Zechariah Jebakumar Arulanantham ,&nbsp;Jaffar A. Al-Tawfiq","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide, necessitating an understanding of its effects on their health and functional capacity. This study utilized the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and pulmonary function test (PFT) to evaluate post-infection recovery of HCWs, and analyzed the results in relation to comorbidities, symptoms, and healthcare admission.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>HCWs who previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were recruited, and the 6MWT and PFT were conducted. Clinical data, including comorbidities, symptoms, hospitalization history, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation, were collected. Binary logistic regression analysis and Fisher's exact test were employed to examine the associations between these factors and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and the 6MWT.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study comprised 80 HCWs, with various comorbidities and various presenting symptoms. On average, 167.24 days (± 63.83 days) post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, 34 (42.5 %) had a DLCO% &lt; 80 % of the predicted value, while 46 (57.5 %) had a DLCO% of ≥ 80 %. The mean six-minute-walk distance (6MWD) was 400.6 ± 54.1 m. No significant associations were found between DLCO% and most of the factors examined, except for Forced Expiratory Flow 25–75 % (FEF25–75 %), although this was not statistically significant (P=0.069).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study provides significant data regarding the functional recovery of HCWs who have recovered from COVID-19 using the 6MWT. Importantly, the findings demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 infection did not substantially impair the pulmonary functional capacity of HCWs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"18 3","pages":"Article 102664"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034125000139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide, necessitating an understanding of its effects on their health and functional capacity. This study utilized the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and pulmonary function test (PFT) to evaluate post-infection recovery of HCWs, and analyzed the results in relation to comorbidities, symptoms, and healthcare admission.

Methods

HCWs who previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 were recruited, and the 6MWT and PFT were conducted. Clinical data, including comorbidities, symptoms, hospitalization history, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation, were collected. Binary logistic regression analysis and Fisher's exact test were employed to examine the associations between these factors and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and the 6MWT.

Results

The study comprised 80 HCWs, with various comorbidities and various presenting symptoms. On average, 167.24 days (± 63.83 days) post-SARS-CoV-2 infection, 34 (42.5 %) had a DLCO% < 80 % of the predicted value, while 46 (57.5 %) had a DLCO% of ≥ 80 %. The mean six-minute-walk distance (6MWD) was 400.6 ± 54.1 m. No significant associations were found between DLCO% and most of the factors examined, except for Forced Expiratory Flow 25–75 % (FEF25–75 %), although this was not statistically significant (P=0.069).

Conclusion

The study provides significant data regarding the functional recovery of HCWs who have recovered from COVID-19 using the 6MWT. Importantly, the findings demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 infection did not substantially impair the pulmonary functional capacity of HCWs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医护人员covid -19后的功能恢复:来自6分钟步行测试和DLCO分析的见解
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行影响了全世界的卫生保健工作者(HCWs),有必要了解其对健康和功能的影响。本研究采用6分钟步行测试(6MWT)和肺功能测试(PFT)评估HCWs感染后恢复情况,并分析结果与合并症、症状和入院情况的关系。方法:招募既往SARS-CoV-2阳性的医护人员,进行6MWT和PFT检测。收集临床资料,包括合并症、症状、住院史、重症监护病房(ICU)入住情况和机械通气情况。采用二元logistic回归分析和Fisher精确检验来检验这些因素与肺一氧化碳弥散能力(DLCO)和6MWT之间的关系。结果:本研究共纳入80例HCWs患者,均有不同的合并症和不同的表现症状。sars - cov -2感染后平均167.24天(± 63.83天),34例(42.5 %)患者DLCO%。结论:本研究为使用6MWT治疗COVID-19康复的医护人员的功能恢复提供了重要数据。重要的是,研究结果表明,SARS-CoV-2感染并未严重损害医护人员的肺功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection and Public Health
Journal of Infection and Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.50%
发文量
203
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other. The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners. It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.
期刊最新文献
Serological signals of past dengue exposure in general practice in southern mainland France. Bacterial superinfection in pregnant women with severe COVID-19: Prevalence, resistance patterns and outcomes. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis secondary to isolated bronchial infection caused by Mycobacterium marseillense in a patient with GATA2 missense mutation: A rare case report A comprehensive review of resistome profiles in ocular pathogens: Insights into Pseudomonas aeruginosa and emerging resistance trends. Dermatopathic lymphadenopathy without cutaneous manifestations presenting as fever of unknown origin: A rare case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1