Patricia Brassolatti, Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto, Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro, Leandro Augusto de Almeida, Carla Roberta Tim, Michele Akemi Nishioka, José Ricardo de Souza, Ana Laura Martins de Andrade
{"title":"Systemic photobiomodulation: an integrative review of evidence for intravascular laser irradiation of blood and vascular photobiomodulation.","authors":"Patricia Brassolatti, Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto, Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro, Leandro Augusto de Almeida, Carla Roberta Tim, Michele Akemi Nishioka, José Ricardo de Souza, Ana Laura Martins de Andrade","doi":"10.1007/s10103-024-04233-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, clinical practice has demonstrated various applications for systemic laser photobiomodulation (PBM). In recent years, an increasing number of studies have been highlighted in the literature; however, they differ in their application methods, which can be intravenous, referred to as ILIB (intravascular laser irradiation of blood), or transdermally, recently termed VPBM (vascular photobiomodulation). This review aimed to compile all findings on these techniques and critically discuss their results. A search for articles was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to select descriptors with the boolean operators \"AND/OR.\" After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 articles were selected. Of these, 19 studies discussed the use of systemic PBM with intravenous application, and 7 studies reported transcutaneous application. Regarding clinical studies, 28 studies addressed the application of the techniques in respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurological, and musculoskeletal conditions. For preclinical studies, 9 articles primarily discussed the application of systemic PBM in pulmonary and musculoskeletal conditions. Despite the promising results, methodological limitations, and variabilities in studies on systemic laser PBM prevent the categorical assertion of its efficacy. It is essential to conduct rigorous new studies to elucidate the mechanisms of action and determine the technique's efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04233-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Currently, clinical practice has demonstrated various applications for systemic laser photobiomodulation (PBM). In recent years, an increasing number of studies have been highlighted in the literature; however, they differ in their application methods, which can be intravenous, referred to as ILIB (intravascular laser irradiation of blood), or transdermally, recently termed VPBM (vascular photobiomodulation). This review aimed to compile all findings on these techniques and critically discuss their results. A search for articles was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) to select descriptors with the boolean operators "AND/OR." After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 articles were selected. Of these, 19 studies discussed the use of systemic PBM with intravenous application, and 7 studies reported transcutaneous application. Regarding clinical studies, 28 studies addressed the application of the techniques in respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurological, and musculoskeletal conditions. For preclinical studies, 9 articles primarily discussed the application of systemic PBM in pulmonary and musculoskeletal conditions. Despite the promising results, methodological limitations, and variabilities in studies on systemic laser PBM prevent the categorical assertion of its efficacy. It is essential to conduct rigorous new studies to elucidate the mechanisms of action and determine the technique's efficacy.
目前,临床实践已经证明了系统激光光生物调节(PBM)的各种应用。近年来,越来越多的研究在文献中得到强调;然而,它们的应用方法不同,可以是静脉注射,称为ILIB(血管内激光照射血液),也可以是经皮注射,最近称为VPBM(血管光生物调节)。这篇综述的目的是汇编这些技术的所有发现,并批判性地讨论它们的结果。在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中搜索文章,使用医学主题标题(MeSH)选择布尔运算符“and /OR”的描述符。应用纳入和排除标准后,共选择37篇文献。其中,19项研究讨论了系统性PBM与静脉应用的使用,7项研究报道了经皮应用。在临床研究方面,28项研究涉及该技术在呼吸、心血管、代谢、神经和肌肉骨骼疾病中的应用。在临床前研究方面,9篇文章主要讨论了系统性PBM在肺部和肌肉骨骼疾病中的应用。尽管取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但方法上的局限性和系统性激光PBM研究的可变性阻止了对其疗效的明确断言。有必要进行严格的新研究来阐明作用机制并确定该技术的功效。
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics.
The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.