Antifungal susceptibility testing and determination of local epidemiological cut-off values for Candida species isolated from women with vulvovaginal candidiasis.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2025-03-04 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.02488-24
Vasiliki Kroustali, Lamprini Kanioura, Esmeralda Resoulai, Maria Siopi, Stavroula Antonopoulou, Joseph Meletiadis
{"title":"Antifungal susceptibility testing and determination of local epidemiological cut-off values for <i>Candida</i> species isolated from women with vulvovaginal candidiasis.","authors":"Vasiliki Kroustali, Lamprini Kanioura, Esmeralda Resoulai, Maria Siopi, Stavroula Antonopoulou, Joseph Meletiadis","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02488-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The lack of clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for antifungals prescribed for vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) make interpretation of antifungal susceptibility data difficult. This leads to empirical prescribing, poor clinical management and emergence of resistance. The <i>in vitro</i> susceptibilities of 152 <i>Candida albicans</i>, 105 <i>Candida parapsilosis</i>, 31 <i>Nakaseomyces glabratus,</i> and 8 <i>Pichia kudriavzevii</i> VVC isolates against eight antifungals, were determined according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) E.Def 7.4. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions were analyzed and local ECOFFs were determined visually and statistically. The <i>in vitro</i> activity of azoles was correlated with fluconazole susceptibility and clinical data were evaluated. The MICs of various azoles showed a significant correlation with the MICs of fluconazole and fluconazole non-wild type (WT) isolates had significantly higher MICs for other azoles. The estimated local ECOFFs for <i>C. albicans</i> were 0.016 mg/L (ketoconazole, clotrimazole), 0.06 mg/L (miconazole, econazole, itraconazole), 1 mg/L (fenticonazole), and 3,200 mg/L (boric acid). For <i>C. parapsilosis</i>, local ECOFFs were 0.06 mg/L (ketoconazole, clotrimazole, itraconazole), 1 mg/L (miconazole, econazole), 2 mg/L (fenticonazole), and 3,200 mg/L (boric acid). For <i>N. glabratus</i>, they were 1 mg/L (ketoconazole, clotrimazole, miconazole, itraconazole), 2 mg/L (econazole, fenticonazole), and 12,800 mg/L (boric acid). Non-WT isolates were detected for azoles in <i>N. glabratus</i> (10%-35%), <i>C. albicans</i> (5%-16%), and <i>C. parapsilosis</i> (≤ 3%). All isolates were WT for boric acid. Local ECOFFs were established for three major <i>Candida</i> species causing VVC, guiding the identification of non-WT isolates potentially associated with treatment failure.IMPORTANCEThe interpretation of <i>in vitro</i> susceptibility data of <i>Candida</i> isolates from women with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is challenging due to the lack of clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for drugs used in VVC. In the present study, local ECOFFs were established for three major <i>Candida</i> species causing VVC, guiding the identification of non-wild type isolates potentially associated with treatment failure. This paper provides the framework for developing ECOFFs and ultimately CBPs that would help guide antifungal therapy of VVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":" ","pages":"e0248824"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11878056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02488-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The lack of clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for antifungals prescribed for vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) make interpretation of antifungal susceptibility data difficult. This leads to empirical prescribing, poor clinical management and emergence of resistance. The in vitro susceptibilities of 152 Candida albicans, 105 Candida parapsilosis, 31 Nakaseomyces glabratus, and 8 Pichia kudriavzevii VVC isolates against eight antifungals, were determined according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) E.Def 7.4. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions were analyzed and local ECOFFs were determined visually and statistically. The in vitro activity of azoles was correlated with fluconazole susceptibility and clinical data were evaluated. The MICs of various azoles showed a significant correlation with the MICs of fluconazole and fluconazole non-wild type (WT) isolates had significantly higher MICs for other azoles. The estimated local ECOFFs for C. albicans were 0.016 mg/L (ketoconazole, clotrimazole), 0.06 mg/L (miconazole, econazole, itraconazole), 1 mg/L (fenticonazole), and 3,200 mg/L (boric acid). For C. parapsilosis, local ECOFFs were 0.06 mg/L (ketoconazole, clotrimazole, itraconazole), 1 mg/L (miconazole, econazole), 2 mg/L (fenticonazole), and 3,200 mg/L (boric acid). For N. glabratus, they were 1 mg/L (ketoconazole, clotrimazole, miconazole, itraconazole), 2 mg/L (econazole, fenticonazole), and 12,800 mg/L (boric acid). Non-WT isolates were detected for azoles in N. glabratus (10%-35%), C. albicans (5%-16%), and C. parapsilosis (≤ 3%). All isolates were WT for boric acid. Local ECOFFs were established for three major Candida species causing VVC, guiding the identification of non-WT isolates potentially associated with treatment failure.IMPORTANCEThe interpretation of in vitro susceptibility data of Candida isolates from women with vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is challenging due to the lack of clinical breakpoints (CBPs) and epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs) for drugs used in VVC. In the present study, local ECOFFs were established for three major Candida species causing VVC, guiding the identification of non-wild type isolates potentially associated with treatment failure. This paper provides the framework for developing ECOFFs and ultimately CBPs that would help guide antifungal therapy of VVC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
期刊最新文献
A nomogram prediction model for embryo implantation outcomes based on the cervical microbiota of the infertile patients during IVF-FET. Multi-omics analysis of the mechanism of alfalfa and wheat-induced rumen flatulence in Xizang sheep. Differential effects of pine wilt disease on root endosphere, rhizosphere, and soil microbiome of Korean white pine. Diversity in chemical subunits and linkages: a key molecular determinant of microbial richness, microbiota interactions, and substrate utilization. Rapid detection of β-lactamase activity using the rapid Amp NP test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1