Bayesian Sample Size Calculation in Small n, Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (snSMART).

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pharmaceutical Statistics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/pst.2465
Fang Fang, Roy N Tamura, Thomas M Braun, Kelley M Kidwell
{"title":"Bayesian Sample Size Calculation in Small n, Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trials (snSMART).","authors":"Fang Fang, Roy N Tamura, Thomas M Braun, Kelley M Kidwell","doi":"10.1002/pst.2465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A recent study design for clinical trials with small sample sizes is the small n, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (snSMART). An snSMART design has been previously proposed to compare the efficacy of two dose levels versus placebo. In such a trial, participants are initially randomized to receive either low dose, high dose or placebo in stage 1. In stage 2, participants are re-randomized to either dose level depending on their initial treatment and a dichotomous response. A Bayesian analytic approach borrowing information from both stages was proposed and shown to improve the efficiency of estimation. In this paper, we propose two sample size determination (SSD) methods for the proposed snSMART comparing two dose levels with placebo. Both methods adopt the average coverage criterion (ACC) approach. In the first approach, the sample size is calculated in one step, taking advantage of the explicit posterior variance of the treatment effect. In the other two step approach, we update the sample size needed for a single-stage parallel design with a proposed adjustment factor (AF). Through simulations, we demonstrate that the required sample sizes calculated using the two SSD approaches both provide the desired power. We also provide an applet to allow for convenient and fast sample size calculation in this snSMART setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"24 1","pages":"e2465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.2465","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A recent study design for clinical trials with small sample sizes is the small n, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (snSMART). An snSMART design has been previously proposed to compare the efficacy of two dose levels versus placebo. In such a trial, participants are initially randomized to receive either low dose, high dose or placebo in stage 1. In stage 2, participants are re-randomized to either dose level depending on their initial treatment and a dichotomous response. A Bayesian analytic approach borrowing information from both stages was proposed and shown to improve the efficiency of estimation. In this paper, we propose two sample size determination (SSD) methods for the proposed snSMART comparing two dose levels with placebo. Both methods adopt the average coverage criterion (ACC) approach. In the first approach, the sample size is calculated in one step, taking advantage of the explicit posterior variance of the treatment effect. In the other two step approach, we update the sample size needed for a single-stage parallel design with a proposed adjustment factor (AF). Through simulations, we demonstrate that the required sample sizes calculated using the two SSD approaches both provide the desired power. We also provide an applet to allow for convenient and fast sample size calculation in this snSMART setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小n次连续多分配随机试验(snSMART)中的贝叶斯样本量计算。
最近一项针对小样本量临床试验的研究设计是小n、顺序、多任务、随机试验(snSMART)。先前提出了一种snSMART设计来比较两种剂量水平与安慰剂的疗效。在这样的试验中,参与者最初在第一阶段随机接受低剂量、高剂量或安慰剂。在第二阶段,参与者根据他们的初始治疗和二分反应被重新随机分配到两种剂量水平。利用这两个阶段的信息,提出了一种贝叶斯分析方法,并证明了该方法可以提高估计效率。在本文中,我们提出了两种样本量测定(SSD)方法,将两种剂量水平与安慰剂进行比较。两种方法均采用平均覆盖准则(ACC)方法。在第一种方法中,利用治疗效果的显式后验方差,一步计算样本量。在其他两步方法中,我们使用建议的调整因子(AF)更新单级并行设计所需的样本量。通过模拟,我们证明了使用两种SSD方法计算所需的样本大小都提供了所需的功率。我们还提供了一个applet,以便在此snSMART设置中方便快速地计算样本大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
期刊最新文献
A Constrained Hierarchical Bayesian Model Considering Latent Biomarker Subgroups for Time-To-Event Endpoints in Randomized Phase II Trials. Consistency Assessment and Regional Sample Size Calculation for MRCT Under Random Effects Model. Application of Causal Inference to Establish Assay Effect in the Absence of a Bridging Study: A Case Study of MenACWY-CRM Conjugate Vaccine Data. Using Off-Treatment Sequential Multiple Imputation for Binary Outcomes to Address Intercurrent Events Handled by a Treatment Policy Strategy. Evaluating Safety Rules in Ongoing Dose-Escalation Trials Using BOIN: A Comparative Analysis of Criteria and Their Impact on Dose-Level Safety Assessments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1