Accuracy of real-time PCR for the detection of paratuberculosis in actual samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES Preventive veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106436
Tian Liu , Hanyu Lin , Lingling Zhu , D. Aaron Yang , Huochun Yao , Zihao Pan
{"title":"Accuracy of real-time PCR for the detection of paratuberculosis in actual samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Tian Liu ,&nbsp;Hanyu Lin ,&nbsp;Lingling Zhu ,&nbsp;D. Aaron Yang ,&nbsp;Huochun Yao ,&nbsp;Zihao Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Paratuberculosis, an infectious and chronic ailment that affects ruminants, causes significant annual economic losses to the livestock industry. Early diagnosis and prompt culling are the primary measures for controlling this disease, highlighting the need for accurate and rapid diagnostic methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the diagnosis of paratuberculosis. We searched for and selected articles from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley-Blackwell, Springerlink, AGRICOLA, and CAB Abstracts, with VETQUADAS (VQ) employed to assess the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis and heterogeneity investigation were conducted using the “Meta4diag” package in “R” software, Meta-Disc 2.0, and Meta-Disc, while the Deeks’ test was utilized to detect publication bias. The studies included in the systematic review displayed a moderate level of heterogeneity (<em>I²</em> = 48.6 %) with no significant publication bias (<em>p</em> = 0.998). The pooled sensitivity was determined to be 0.92 [95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.85–0.96], and the specificity was 0.85 [95 % CI, 0.77–0.91], with a summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (SROCAUC) of 0.95 [95 % CI, 0.91–0.98]. These findings indicate that the qPCR method has high diagnostic value for identifying paratuberculosis in animals. Subgroup analysis revealed satisfactory stability in these studies; however, the current single-target qPCR detection strategy still has limitations, as it fails to simultaneously ensure both sensitivity and specificity. Future developments should focus on multi-target detection strategies to provide more reliable qPCR testing methods for controlling paratuberculosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 106436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725000212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paratuberculosis, an infectious and chronic ailment that affects ruminants, causes significant annual economic losses to the livestock industry. Early diagnosis and prompt culling are the primary measures for controlling this disease, highlighting the need for accurate and rapid diagnostic methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the diagnosis of paratuberculosis. We searched for and selected articles from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley-Blackwell, Springerlink, AGRICOLA, and CAB Abstracts, with VETQUADAS (VQ) employed to assess the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis and heterogeneity investigation were conducted using the “Meta4diag” package in “R” software, Meta-Disc 2.0, and Meta-Disc, while the Deeks’ test was utilized to detect publication bias. The studies included in the systematic review displayed a moderate level of heterogeneity ( = 48.6 %) with no significant publication bias (p = 0.998). The pooled sensitivity was determined to be 0.92 [95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.85–0.96], and the specificity was 0.85 [95 % CI, 0.77–0.91], with a summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (SROCAUC) of 0.95 [95 % CI, 0.91–0.98]. These findings indicate that the qPCR method has high diagnostic value for identifying paratuberculosis in animals. Subgroup analysis revealed satisfactory stability in these studies; however, the current single-target qPCR detection strategy still has limitations, as it fails to simultaneously ensure both sensitivity and specificity. Future developments should focus on multi-target detection strategies to provide more reliable qPCR testing methods for controlling paratuberculosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实时PCR检测实际样本副结核的准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
副结核病是一种影响反刍动物的传染性和慢性疾病,每年给畜牧业造成重大经济损失。早期诊断和及时扑杀是控制该病的主要措施,这突出表明需要准确和快速的诊断方法。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估定量PCR (qPCR)在副结核诊断中的有效性。我们从PubMed、Web of Science、Elsevier ScienceDirect、Wiley-Blackwell、Springerlink、AGRICOLA和CAB Abstracts等数据库中检索并选择文章,采用VETQUADAS (VQ)评估文献质量。采用“R”软件中的“Meta4diag”软件包、Meta-Disc 2.0和Meta-Disc进行meta分析和异质性调查,采用Deeks检验检测发表偏倚。纳入系统评价的研究显示出中等程度的异质性(I²= 48.6 %),无显著的发表偏倚(p = 0.998)。合并敏感性为0.92[95 %置信区间[CI], 0.85-0.96],特异性为0.85[95 % CI, 0.77-0.91],总受试者工作特征曲线下面积(SROCAUC)为0.95[95 % CI, 0.91-0.98]。这些结果表明,qPCR方法对动物副结核有较高的诊断价值。亚组分析显示这些研究的稳定性令人满意;然而,目前的单靶点qPCR检测策略仍然存在局限性,不能同时保证灵敏度和特异性。未来的发展应侧重于多靶点检测策略,为控制副结核提供更可靠的qPCR检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive veterinary medicine
Preventive veterinary medicine 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on: Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals; Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases; Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology; Disease and infection control or eradication measures; The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment; Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis; Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.
期刊最新文献
Annotating opportunistic camera-trap images with conditions of recording, for the disease surveillance of Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) Tracing paratuberculosis in Colombia: A scoping review Toxoplasma gondii infection in wildlife in China (1985–2024): A systematic review and meta-analysis with machine learning Antibiotic use in Norwegian cattle and pig production National BVDV eradication programme: Assessing the utility of the spot test
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1