Changes in multidisciplinary perceptions of trauma video review following implementation of a novel program: let us go to the tape.

IF 2.2 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-01-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001621
Matthew Murray, Eli Rogers, Kate Dellonte, Ryan Peter Dumas, Michael A Vella
{"title":"Changes in multidisciplinary perceptions of trauma video review following implementation of a novel program: let us go to the tape.","authors":"Matthew Murray, Eli Rogers, Kate Dellonte, Ryan Peter Dumas, Michael A Vella","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma video review (TVR) is an evolving technology that can be used to measure technical and non-technical aspects of trauma care leading to meaningful improvements. Only 30% of centers currently use TVR, with non-users citing medicolegal concerns, staff discomfort with recording, and resource constraints as barriers to implementation. Multiple studies have shown established TVR programs are well-perceived by staff. Little is known about perceptions prior to, and after implementation of a new program.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated changes in TVR perceptions following implementation of a new program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 15-question survey was distributed to emergency department and trauma surgery providers at a level I trauma center prior to, and 1 year after, implementation of TVR. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate perceptions of the value of TVR, measures of team dynamics, and staff discomfort with recording.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 pre-implementation and 82 post-implementation responses were recorded. Perceptions in several domains improved post-implementation including team leader effectiveness (3 (3-4) to 4 (3-4); p=0.002), communication (3 (3-4) to 4 (3-4); p<0.001), and self confidence in role (4 (3-4) to 4 (4-5); p=0.001). Staff discomfort with recording decreased post-implementation (3 (2-4) to 2 (2-3); p=0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows that perceptions of TVR changed favorably after implementation, particularly perceptions of team dynamics and provider discomfort with recording. These results can be used to mitigate staff concerns about TVR and encourage the development of new programs.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"e001621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Background: Trauma video review (TVR) is an evolving technology that can be used to measure technical and non-technical aspects of trauma care leading to meaningful improvements. Only 30% of centers currently use TVR, with non-users citing medicolegal concerns, staff discomfort with recording, and resource constraints as barriers to implementation. Multiple studies have shown established TVR programs are well-perceived by staff. Little is known about perceptions prior to, and after implementation of a new program.

Objective: This study evaluated changes in TVR perceptions following implementation of a new program.

Methods: A 15-question survey was distributed to emergency department and trauma surgery providers at a level I trauma center prior to, and 1 year after, implementation of TVR. A 5-point Likert scale was used to evaluate perceptions of the value of TVR, measures of team dynamics, and staff discomfort with recording.

Results: A total of 106 pre-implementation and 82 post-implementation responses were recorded. Perceptions in several domains improved post-implementation including team leader effectiveness (3 (3-4) to 4 (3-4); p=0.002), communication (3 (3-4) to 4 (3-4); p<0.001), and self confidence in role (4 (3-4) to 4 (4-5); p=0.001). Staff discomfort with recording decreased post-implementation (3 (2-4) to 2 (2-3); p=0.002).

Conclusion: Our study shows that perceptions of TVR changed favorably after implementation, particularly perceptions of team dynamics and provider discomfort with recording. These results can be used to mitigate staff concerns about TVR and encourage the development of new programs.

Level of evidence: IV.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实施一项新计划后创伤视频回顾的多学科认知的变化:让我们去看录像带。
背景:创伤视频评论(TVR)是一项不断发展的技术,可用于衡量创伤护理的技术和非技术方面,从而导致有意义的改进。目前只有30%的中心使用TVR,非用户认为医学上的担忧、工作人员对记录的不适应以及资源限制是实施TVR的障碍。多项研究表明,已建立的TVR计划得到了员工的认可。人们对新项目实施前和实施后的看法知之甚少。目的:本研究评估了实施一项新计划后TVR感知的变化。方法:在实施TVR前和实施后1年,对某一级创伤中心急诊科和创伤外科医生进行15个问题的调查。采用5分李克特量表来评估对TVR价值的认知、团队动态的测量以及员工对录音的不适。结果:共记录了106例实施前反应和82例实施后反应。在几个领域的认知在实施后得到改善,包括团队领导的有效性(3(3-4)到4 (3-4);P =0.002)、沟通(3 (3-4)~ 4 (3-4);结论:我们的研究表明,实施TVR后,对TVR的看法发生了有利的变化,特别是对团队动力和提供者对录音的不适的看法。这些结果可以用来减轻员工对TVR的担忧,并鼓励开发新项目。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence documentation in trauma resuscitation: efficiency requires guardrails. A place for everything… and everything in its place? Strategies for addressing social drivers of health at US trauma centers. Challenges in acute care surgery: skewered on a fence post - a report. Timing, risk, and reality: early venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis in patients with TBI requiring operative intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1